UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )



Filed by the Registrant ☒                  Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

graphic

FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25 (b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6 (i) (1) and D-11.




A LETTER FROM OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Ronald F. Clarke 

Chairman &

Chief Executive Officer

My Fellow Shareholders,

Thank you for your investment in FLEETCOR.

Performance & Positioning

Our full year 2022 financial performance was outstanding, with revenue of $3.4 billion, up 21% and adjusted earnings per share of $16.10, up 22%. Both were way ahead of our expectations heading into the year. We also closed five capability acquisitions (inclusive of the cross border deal closed on January 3), and made three minority investments to strengthen our position in our Corporate Payments and EV lines of business.

Additionally, we meaningfully advanced our “beyond strategy” in 2022, extending both the product set and served customer segments in each of our major businesses. These beyond extensions increase our TAM, and better position our LOB for long term growth. Some highlights from 2022 include:

In Global Fleet, we significantly advanced our EV capabilities, and the concept of “defensive” and “offensive” EV initiatives

In Brazil, we expanded our tag fueling solution to more accepting sites and more users and we launched a new vehicle insurance offering, which enjoyed rapid acceptance

In Corporate Payments, we added AP automation workflow software to our full AP payment platform, and further scaled our cross-border footprint in Europe

In Lodging, we further expanded our two new verticals, airlines and insurance, with each reaching almost $100M in revenue

Ultimately, we believe that excellent financial performance, combined with our strategic progress will enable us to increase shareholder returns. Our mid-term objectives are to grow revenue and adjusted net income per diluted share 10% and 15-20% annually, respectively. We expect the market to reward our performance as we deliver results.

Governance & Board Oversight

We have a very experienced Board of Directors with a diverse set of skills and experience, including leading large, global public companies within our industry. Our directors provide valuable oversight regarding audit, compensation, governance and company strategy.

We’ve made meaningful progress in refreshing and diversifying our Board over the last year, having appointed Annabelle Bexiga and Rahul Gupta to the Board in 2023. The experience in technology and fintech that they bring, will be quite additive to the company as we continue to navigate the changing landscape of the industry, and build a bigger and stronger company. We’re pleased to report that women and minorities now represent 36% of the Board.

Our Board of Directors have been deeply involved in our shareholder engagement efforts, and have helped drive responsive enhancements to our practices.



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

1

 


A LETTER FROM OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Environmental & Social Endeavors

Our comprehensive employee development and training programs, offer the tools and resources to attract and retain the best talent. Our benefits further strengthen our competitive packages. We are proud of the journey we provide our employees at all levels, and we will continue to monitor the current environment for talent, and adjust our offerings to maintain our position as an employer of choice in the payments industry.

Our values foster an inclusive culture, and we are proud of the environment that we’ve created where women represent more than one-half of our global workforce, and less than two-thirds of our domestic employees identify as White/Caucasian. We believe this diversity enhances our personal work experiences and boosts our company’s performance.

Your Support

On behalf of our Board of Directors, we sincerely ask that you vote with our recommendations. We appreciate our shareholders’ support and feedback, and we will continue to reach out on a regular basis to gain further insights and perspectives.

Sincerely,

 

Ronald F. Clarke

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

 
Check box if any part

Annual Meeting of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the dateShareholders

The Company’s Annual Meeting of its filing.

(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:





flt2016proxyimage1.jpg
2018 SPECIAL MEETING PROXY STATEMENT

SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The Special Meeting of Stockholders of FleetCor Technologies, Inc. will be held at
5445 Triangle Parkway, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
on February 7, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.







flt2016proxyimage1.jpg
DECEMBER 29, 2017
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting of Stockholders of FleetCor Technologies, Inc., which will be held at our corporate offices at 5445 Triangle Parkway, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092, on Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
The attached Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement contain details of the business to be conducted at the Special Meeting.
Whether or not you attend the Special Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Therefore, I urge you to promptly vote and submit your proxy via the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you decide to attend the Special Meeting, you will be able to vote in person, even if you have previously submitted your proxy.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued interest in the affairs of FleetCor. I look forward to greeting as many of our stockholders as possible.
Shareholders will be held
at 3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 2400 Atlanta, Georgia 30305
on June 9, 2023 at 10:00 a.m.

 

Sincerely,22023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

 
flt2016proxyimage3.jpg

NOTICE OF 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Agenda

 
Ronald F. Clarke
Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerTo elect the eleven directors


This document is dated December 29, 2017

To ratify the reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent public accounting firm

To approve, on an advisory basis, named executive officer compensation

To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of shareholder voting on compensation of named executive officers

To vote on a shareholder proposal to amend the shareholders’ right to call a special meeting of shareholders, if properly presented

We may transact other business that properly comes before the meeting.

Mailing Date and is first being mailed to stockholders onAvailability of Proxy Materials

On or about December 29, 2017.



i






FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To our stockholders:
The Special MeetingApril 27, 2023, we mailed a notice of the Stockholderselectronic availability of FleetCor Technologies, Inc. will be held at our corporate offices at 5445 Triangle Parkway, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092, on February 7, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. for the following purposes:
1.Approve the FleetCor Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Compensation Plan.
2.To transact such other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting.
Only stockholdersproxy materials to shareholders. Shareholders of record at the close of business on December 28, 2017April 17, 2023 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting.
On December 29, 2017, we will begin mailing our stockholders our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement.
Proxies for the matters to be voted upon at the Special Meeting are being solicitedmeeting.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Please vote as soon as possible by orderone of the Board of Directors.


Peachtree Corners, Georgia
December 29, 2017

IMPORTANT
Whethermethods shown below, whether or not you expect to attend the Special Meeting in person, we urge youannual meeting. Be sure to votehave your shares at your earliest convenience. This will ensure the presence of a quorum at the meeting. Promptly voting your shares via the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card, will save usvoting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in hand and follow the expenses and extra work of additional solicitation. We have enclosed an addressed envelope for which no postage is required if mailed ininstructions below. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET the United States. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares atday before the meeting if you desire to do so, as your proxy is revocable at your option.


ii






TABLE OF CONTENTS
(June 8, 2023).

By Internet

www.proxyvote.com 

Use the internet to transmit your
voting instruction and for electronic
delivery of information

By Phone

1-800-690-6903 

Use any touch tone telephone to
transmit your voting instructions

By Mail

Mark, sign and date your proxy card
and return it in the postage-paid
envelope provided with your proxy
materials or return it to Vote Processing,
c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way,
Edgewood, NY 11717

  

Sincerely,

FLEETCOR Board of Directors

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on June 9, 2023: Our Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at https://investor.FLEETCOR.com.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement3


TABLE OF CONTENTS

01.SUMMARY
Proposals and Board Recommendations5
02.FLEETCOR AT A GLANCE
6
Our Mission6
7
Our Performance7
Our Board of Directors8
Forward-Leaning Corporate Governance8
Forward-Leaning Compensation Practices8
Shareholder Engagement Results8
Our Commitment to Culture, Diversity Inclusion, Belonging and Sustainability9
Human Capital9
Culture9
Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging9
Employee Wellness10
Talent Development10
Voice of the Employee10
Sustainability11
03.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Our Board of Directors12
Director Nominees13
Evaluation and Evolution of Our Board17
Board Meetings and Committees17
Audit Committee18
Compensation Committee18
Nomination and Governance Committee19
Executive and Acquisitions Committee19
Information Technology and Security Committee19
Strategic Review Committee19
Board Leadership19
Risk Oversight20
Director Independence21
2022 Director Compensation21
Director Qualifications22
Director Nomination Process22
Governance Policies23
04.INFORMATION REGARDING BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, AND MANAGEMENT24
05.COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Leadership Transitions in 202226
Navigating the Opportunities of 202227
2022 Performance27
Responsiveness to 2022 Say-On-Pay Vote28
Shareholder Outreach Generally29
Forward-Leaning Compensation Practices Components of Compensation and Target29
Direct Compensation Mix30
Target Mix of Compensation32
Equity Compensation in Prior Fiscal Years33
Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation34
Base Salary34
Annual Cash Incentive34
2022 Performance Goals and Results35
Equity Awards38
2021 Performance Stock Option Award for CEO38
Other NEOs’ 2022 Equity Awards38
Performance Share Grants38
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) Grants38
Stock Option Grants40
Prior-Year Equity Awards40
Omission of Certain Goal Levels41
Other Compensation and Benefits41
Process to Review, Revise, and Set Compensation41
Compensation Peer Group42
Information on Other Compensation-Related Topics43
06.2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
2022 Summary Compensation Table44
45
2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards46
47
2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested49
50
Employment Agreements, Severance and Change of Control Benefits50
51
Equity Awards51
52
Officer Departures During 202253
07.EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION53
53
53
3810.CEO PAY RATIO54
11.PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE54
Pay Versus Performance Table55
TSR and Peer TSR vs. Compensation Actually Paid56
Net Income vs. Compensation Actually Paid56
Adjusted EPS vs. Compensation Actually Paid56
12.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS57
13.DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS57
14.FIVE YEAR STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH57
15.AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT58
Audit Committee59
16.AUDIT MATTERS60
Fees Billed by Ernst & Young LLP60
Audit Fees60
Audit Related Fees60
Tax Fees and All Other Fees60
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor60
17.PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS61
18.PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 202361
19.PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION62
20.PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE FREQUENCY OF SHAREHOLDER VOTING ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS62
21.PROPOSAL 5: PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE SHAREHOLDERS’ RIGHT TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING63
Proposal 5 — Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement63
Other Business64
22.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION64
Shareholder Proposals64
Solicitation of Proxies65
Voting Procedures65
Where to Find More Proxy Voting Information:66
Householding of Proxy Materials66
23.APPENDIX A:67
Management’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures67
Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Net Income Per Diluted Share67
Reconciliation of Net Income to Pro Forma Adjusted Net Income69


42023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


01. SUMMARY

Information About Our 2023 Annual Meeting
Date and Time: Friday, June 9, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time
Place: Our offices at 3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 2400, Atlanta, Georgia 30305
Record Date: April 17, 2023 (73,828,110 common shares and 276,222 unvested restricted shares entitled to vote as of the record date).
Voting: Holders of common shares as of the close of business on April 17, 2023 may vote at the Annual Meeting. One vote per share for each director nominee and each of the other proposals described below.

Proposals and Board Recommendations
  
ProposalBoard
Recommendation
For More
Information
To elect the eleven directorsFOR each nomineePage 61
To ratify the reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent public accounting firm for 2023FORPage 61
To approve, on an advisory basis, named executive officer compensationFORPage 62
To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of shareholder voting on compensation of named executive officersONE YEARPage 62
To vote on a shareholder proposal to amend the shareholders’ right to call a special meeting of shareholders, if properly presentedAGAINSTPage 63

For complete information regarding our 2023 annual meeting of shareholders, the proposals to be voted on and our performance, please review the entire proxy statement and our 2022 annual report, available at https://investor.FLEETCOR.com and proxyvote.com.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

5


02. FLEETCOR AT A GLANCE

$3.4B 

ANNUAL REVENUE

100+ 

COUNTRIES

1.7B+ 

TRANSACTIONS

PER YEAR

~10,000

EMPLOYEES

FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc. (“FLEETCOR”) is a leading global provider of digital payment solutions that enables businesses to control purchases and make payments in a smarter, simpler and better way. We serve businesses, partners, merchants, consumers and payment networks in North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

Businesses spend an estimated $135 trillion each year with other businesses. In many instances, they lack the proper tools to monitor what is being purchased, and employ manual, paper-based, disparate processes and methods to both approve and make payments for their purchases. This often results in wasted time and money due to unnecessary or unauthorized spending, fraud, receipt collection, data input and consolidation, report generation, reimbursement processing, account reconciliations, employee disciplinary actions, and more.

Our wide range of modern, digitized solutions generally provides control, reporting, and automation benefits superior to many of the payment methods businesses often used such as cash, paper checks, general purpose credit cards, as well as employee pay and reclaim processes. In addition to delivering meaningful value to our customers, our solutions also share several important and attractive business model characteristics such as:

Customers are primarily businesses, which tend to have relatively predictable, consistent volumes;
Recurring revenue models driven by recurring volume and higher retention, resulting in predictable revenue;
Similar business-to-business (B2B) selling systems with common sales approaches, management and reporting;
Specialized technology platforms and proprietary payment acceptance networks, which create competitive advantages and barriers to entry; and
High EBITDA margins and cash flow translation and limited capital investment requirements.

Our Vision

FLEETCOR’s vision is that every payment is digital, every purchase is controlled, and every related decision is informed. Digital payments are faster and more secure than paper-based methods such as checks, and provide timely and detailed data which can be utilized to effectively reduce unauthorized purchases and fraud, automate data entry and reporting, and eliminate reimbursement processes. Combining this payment data with analytical tools delivers powerful insights, which managers can use to better run their businesses.

Our Mission

FLEETCOR’s mission is to provide businesses with a smarter way to pay. Through the digitalization of payments, we create and support robust ecosystems which benefit all participating constituents: payment-making customers, payment-accepting merchants, tax-collecting governments, and FLEETCOR.

As of December 31, 2022

62023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


02. FLEETCOR AT A GLANCE

Our Strategy

We are executing on a strategy of optimizing assets, leveraging similar selling methods, and bundling and cross-selling value-added solutions. We continue to enhance our solutions to displace inferior payment methods, improve customers’ mobile and digital experiences, and extend utility. We actively market and sell to current and prospective customers leveraging a multi-channel go-to-market approach, which includes comprehensive digital channels, direct sales forces and strategic partner relationships. We supplement our organic growth strategy and sales efforts by pursuing attractive acquisition opportunities, which serve to strengthen and extend our

market positions and create value even faster. With a long, proven operating history, FLEETCOR now serves hundreds of thousands of business customers with millions of cardholders making payments to millions of vendors around the world.

Our Performance

FLEETCOR has become a global leader in business payments by delivering a superior track record of growth, generating compound annual growth rates of 18% in revenue and 20% in adjusted net income per diluted share (or “Adjusted EPS”) since going public in 2010.

(1) Revenues before 2018 are presented pre-adoption of ASC 606.

(2) Non-GAAP financial measures. See appendix for reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP. 

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

7


02. FLEETCOR AT A GLANCE

Our Board of Directors

In order to oversee our complex, global business, our Board is comprised of experienced individuals who are engaged in their duties and invested in our Company’s success. Our Board recognizes the importance of independence from management and ensures its responsiveness to shareholders by directly connecting directors’ interests with those of our shareholders. Our Board and management have taken a long-term view toward shareholder engagement and recognize that continuous solicitation and consideration of shareholder feedback is critical to driving growth and creating shareholder value.

As a result, we regularly engage with our shareholders throughout the year by multiple means to encourage ongoing, meaningful dialogue.

We encourage you to visit the “Corporate Governance” area of the “Investor Relations” section of our website (https://investor. FLEETCOR.com) where you will find detailed information about our corporate governance practices, including our key governance documents listed below:

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Policy Regarding Interested Party Communications with the Board of Directors

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Insider Trading Policy

Board Committee Charters

The reports and other information contained on websites referred to in this proxy statement (other than to the extent specifically referred to herein as required by the rules of the NYSE or the SEC) are not part of this proxy solicitation and are not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or any other proxy materials.

Forward-Leaning Corporate Governance

In response to our shareholder engagement efforts and recent shareholder votes at our annual meetings, we have taken significant steps to adopt many corporate governance best practices:

Broader Director diversity search criteria
Declassified Board of Directors
Lead Independent Director
Majority voting in Director elections
Expanded shareholder engagement
Proxy access
Shareholder right to call special meetings
Shareholder right to act by written consent

No supermajority shareholder voting
Regular review of governance practices
Continued the expansion of our environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives, including the continued publication of annual Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability report

Forward-Leaning Compensation Practices

FLEETCOR has also embraced best practices in our compensation programs, which strongly support our pay-for-performance philosophy and culture:

NEO compensation aligned with Company and, as applicable, division performance
Base salary levels generally at or below peer median
Target annual cash incentives generally at or below peer median
Significant portion of NEO compensation generally delivered in the form of equity-based awards
Different performance metrics for different compensation components
Incentive payouts tied closely to achieving published guidance where applicable
Significant stock ownership requirements
No repricing or cashing out of underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights
No hedging or pledging of common shares
No excise tax gross-ups
No excessive perquisites
Maintain a compensation clawback policy
Double-trigger change of control provisions
Below-market severance coverage
Shareholder engagement includes governance committee Chair, additional Board members and management
Regular review of compensation programs
Utilize an independent compensation consultant

Shareholder Engagement Results

Our 2022 shareholder outreach regarding executive compensation was a continuation of our annual comprehensive shareholder engagement plan. We have taken decisive action in recent years in response to our shareholder outreach initiatives and we believe that our compensation practices address the feedback we received. Our stockholder engagement ensured that we heard the feedback of our shareholders — in addition to generous access to the management team, after we mailed the 2022 Proxy, but before the 2022 stockholder meeting, we offered the opportunity to discuss our Proxy with our top 10 stockholders as of December 31, 2021.

82023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


02. FLEETCOR AT A GLANCE

Our Commitment to Culture, Diversity Inclusion, Belonging and Sustainability

Corporate responsibility promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders and strengthens Board and management accountability. Our corporate strategy includes a focus on how environmental and social issues may impact the long-term interests of our shareholders and other stakeholders. We believe that environmentally and socially responsible operating practices are important considerations while generating value for our shareholders, being good partners with our customers by providing efficient payment solutions, and being a good employer to our employees.

We created a sustainability working group in 2020, consisting of dedicated internal resources and external advisors to address environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors that are important to our business. During 2021 and 2022, our sustainability working group continued to evaluate potential ESG risks and opportunities relevant to our Company based on the views held by our shareholders, leading ESG frameworks, and ESG rating agencies. We utilized aspects of the Sustainability Accounting Standard Board and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures to evaluate our practices.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2022, FLEETCOR employed approximately 10,000 associates located in over 18 countries around the world, with approximately 4,100 of those associates based in the United States. At FLEETCOR, we strongly believe that talent is a strong determinant of the Company’s performance and success. Our values-driven people programs, practices and policies have been developed to ensure we are able to attract, retain and develop the quality of talent necessary to advance our key initiatives and achieve our strategic objectives. We are firmly committed to delivering a strong employee value proposition and unique employment experience to our associates which, in turn, should lead to better customer experiences and business outcomes.

Culture


Our culture has evolved through time, as the Company has grown considerably both organically and through acquisitions. Despite FLEETCOR’s expansive size and geographic scope, we retain a strong entrepreneurial spirit, and share a common vision, mission and set of values, which together serve as cornerstones to our “One FLEETCOR” culture. Our core values, listed below, are infused in all aspects of FLEETCOR, and guide our employee selection, behavior and interactions with both internal and external stakeholders.

Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging

Our focus on diversity, inclusion and belonging (DIB) is important to our successful “One FLEETCOR” culture. As of December 31, 2022, females represented approximately 53% of our global workforce and approximately 24% of our senior leadership team, while minorities comprised approximately 34% of our domestic workforce and approximately 12% of our senior leadership team.

Fostering a culturally diverse and inclusive environment and creating a true sense of belonging are among our top priorities. Our global diversity council, three regional councils and nine employee resource groups (each, an ERG) are dedicated to building diversity, inclusion and belonging into all aspects of our global operations. Sponsored by the Chairman of the Board and CEO, the councils and ERGs are vital to creating an environment where all employees are able to prosper. Our ERGs allow a safe space for traditionally underrepresented employees to connect and discuss experiences. The ERGs also provide FLEETCOR with perspectives on the unique needs and lived experiences of those who are traditionally underrepresented.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

9


02.FLEETCOR AT A GLANCE

Core Values

 

INNOVATION

Figure out
a better way

COLLABORATION

Accomplish
more together

 

EXECUTION

Get it done
outputs matter

INTEGRITY

Do the
right thing

PEOPLE

We make
the difference

Employee Wellness

FLEETCOR’s benefits programs are designed to meet the evolving needs of a diverse workforce across the globe. Because we want our employees and their families to thrive, in additional to our regular benefit offerings, we focused on physical and mental well-being in 2022. During the year, we offered free, online fitness classes, sponsored the FLEETCOR Wellbeing Challenge, provided access to employee assistance programs in all regions, and celebrated Mental Health Awareness programs globally.

Talent Development

FLEETCOR offers a variety of high-quality learning opportunities, designed to support employee development and organizational effectiveness. Learning opportunities are available in all geographies at all levels, and incorporate personal, business and leadership skills development with the goal of empowering our organization, creating avenues for closing skill gaps, and enhancing the capabilities of our workforce. Leadership, teamwork, communication, and many other soft skills are vital to our success. We offer a wide variety of career opportunities and paths to advancement through on-the-job coaching, training, and education. We are proud to be a company where an associate can start as an intern and turn that experience into a successful career.

Voice of the Employee

We continue to develop and refine our people programs based on feedback we receive directly from our workforce, which we gather through a survey of all employees globally. The participation rate for our 2021 survey was approximately 75%. We believe our employee proposition remains strong and we continue to attract and retain top talent. We continue to share the detailed engagement scores across the organization, and analyze the results to understand differences by geography, demographics, job level, and leader, and to identify opportunities for further improvement. Throughout 2022, we conducted several additional pulse surveys to assess the ongoing engagement of our workforce. We are preparing to launch our 2023 survey in the coming weeks.

In October 2020, FLEETCOR published its inaugural Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report (CRS Report), in which we provided detailed information about the Company’s views and approaches regarding environmental, social and governance issues. We published a 2021 CRS Report in January 2022, which contains information incremental to our inaugural report and is therefore intended to be read in conjunction with that report. Our 2021 CRS Report includes further details related to our global talent strategy, DIB metrics, employee wellness and talent development. We are currently preparing our third CRS Report for publication later this year. Our CRS Reports may be accessed electronically at https://investor.fleetcor.com, in the governance section.

102023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


02.FLEETCOR AT A GLANCE

Sustainability

We believe we should do our part to ensure environmental sustainability. To that end, we:

In the UK, are registered with the Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (ESOS) that assesses energy use and energy efficiency opportunities, including with respect to facilities, transportation and energy usage, at least once every four years

In the UK, comply with the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) regulations with respect to energy consumption and carbon emissions

Intend to continue strengthening our sustainability recording and reporting processes

Offer eco-friendly programs, including Clean Advantage® and EcoPoint, that provide our fleet card customers the opportunity to offset their fleets’ CO2 emissions through the purchase of carbon credits or the planting of new woodlands

Enable fuel cards to pay for alternative energy, such as electricity and hydrogen, for vehicles which require such to operate

Encourage customers to reduce paper consumption through electronic means, such as delivery of invoices, reports and other communications, payment of invoices, and document management

Continue our multi-year initiative to consolidate data centers

Support workplace initiatives designed to reduce our impact on the environment, whether through reduced energy use or effective waste management, including the following:

Motion sensor-controlled lighting
LED lighting
Time-controlled air conditioning
Video & telephone conferencing to reduce meeting-related travel
Printing defaulted to double-sided
Recycling
Reusable cups and water bottles
Disposal of hazardous waste, such as ink cartridges, batteries and light bulbs

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

11


03.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Our Board of Directors

Our Board currently consists of eleven highly experienced and engaged members. Except for our CEO, all of our directors are independent under the NYSE rules. We continually focus on Board composition to ensure an appropriate mix of tenure and expertise that provides fresh perspectives and significant industry and subject matter experience.

The complexity of our global business requires oversight by experienced, informed individuals that understand the industry and challenges, and our Company on a deep level. Our directors’ diverse backgrounds contribute to an effective and well-balanced Board that is able to provide valuable insight to, and effective oversight of, our senior management team.

DIRECTOR EXPERIENCE

Payments, financial services and fintech

Informed about industry 

10 of 11

Finance & accounting

Understands the financial complexities of our business 

9 of 11

Marketing & advertising

Participates in expanding our business and brand awareness 

3 of 11

Technology & innovation

Equipped to respond to rapidly changing technology 

10 of 11

Global business

Able to navigate the global opportunities of our business 

8 of 11

Cyber & information security

Committed to maintaining customers’ trust 

5 of 11

Business development & strategy

Able to respond to fast-moving changes 

9 of 11

Other public company leadership or board service

Experienced in large-scale strategy and operations

9 of 11






Tenure*:

8 Years Average

*Since Company IPO in 2010
and through 2023

Age: 65 Average

122023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


03.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Director Nominees

The Nomination and Governance committee evaluates the Board’s composition at least annually to determine whether directors’ backgrounds and experiences align with our long-term strategy. The committee also takes into consideration the results of the Board’s self-evaluation. Based on its review, the committee determines whether Board refreshment is needed in the near future. Then the committee searches for potential candidates, utilizing a variety of sources to help identify nominees who would be valuable assets to our Board and to FLEETCOR. To meet the needs of our Board, the committee seeks to identify candidates possessing the desired qualities, skills and background.

All directors’ terms expire at this year’s annual meeting, and they will stand for election for a one-year term, expiring at the following annual meeting. At and after the annual meeting, all directors will be elected annually and we will have no classified director terms.

In February and March 2023 the Board was considering feedback it received in light of its continued shareholder engagement, including shareholder views expressed to us on our strategy, performance and Board composition. In March 2023, the Company, following an extensive and deliberative engagement process, entered into a Cooperation Agreement (the “Cooperation Agreement”) with D.E. Shaw Oculus Portfolios, L.L.C. and D.E. Shaw Valence Portfolios, L.L.C. (collectively, “D.E. Shaw”). Under the terms of the Cooperation Agreement, among other things, we appointed Rahul Gupta to the Board. We also formed a Strategic Review Committee of the Board focused on consideration of the possible separation or disposition of one or more businesses of the Company. In addition, we agreed to add a second new director. Upon appointment of the second new director, it is expected that one of the Company’s longer tenured directors will retire. The appointment of Mr. Gupta and the Company’s agreement to add a second new director advances the Company’s Board refreshment process, which is intended to deepen the Board’s skill set in financial oversight. These new appointments follow the January appointment of Annabelle Bexiga, a technology executive.

Based on the needs of the Board and FLEETCOR, the Board has selected Messrs. Buckman, Clarke, Farrelly, Gupta, Hagerty, Jones, Macchia, Sloan and Stull and Mses. Bexiga and Moddelmog as nominees to be voted upon at the annual meeting by the shareholders.

Age: 61 

Director Since: 2023

Annabelle Bexiga

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: Prior Chief Information Officer positions at AIG (NYSE: AIG), a multinational finance and insurance corporation, from 2015 to 2017, TIAA, a Fortune 100 financial services organization, from 2010 to 2015, Bain Capital, and JP Morgan Chase.

Other board experience (current): Triton International Limited, StoneX Group Inc., DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA, and Quantexa Ltd.

Provides: Substantial expertise in technology, security, and financial services.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

13


03.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Age: 75

Director Since: 2013

Michael Buckman

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: former Managing Partner and Founder of Buckman Consulting LLC, a travel, logistics and payment systems consulting firm, since founding in 2009; prior President of the Asia/Pacific division of BCD Travel, and Chief Executive Officer of BCD from 2001 to 2007; Senior executive positions with Homestore.com, American Express, Sabre Travel Services, American Airlines and Worldspan

Provides: Extensive experience as a senior executive of various technology, travel and payment systems companies 

Age: 67

Director Since: 2000

Ronald F. Clarke

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: Company CEO since August 2000; prior President & COO of AHL Services, Inc. a staffing firm; Chief Marketing Officer of Automatic Data Processing, a computer services company; Principal with Booz Allen Hamilton, a global management firm; Marketing Manager of General Electric Company, a diversified technology, media and financial services company

Other board experience (current): Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (NYSE: CDAY)

Provides: Deep knowledge of our Company and industry through his service as our chief executive officer 

Age: 79

Director Since: 2014

Joseph W. Farrelly

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer of Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (NYSE:IPG), a global provider of advertising and marketing services, from 2006 through March 2015; prior Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer at Aventis, Vivendi Universal, Joseph E. Seagrams and Nabisco

Other board experience (current): NetNumber Inc.

Other board experience (prior): Helium, GridApps and Aperture Technologies, Inc., all of which were acquired by larger companies in their respective industries

Provides: Substantial experience and knowledge regarding information technology and security; experience in advertising and marketing 

142023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


03.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Age: 64

Director Since: 2023

Rahul Gupta

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: Prior executive positions as CEO of RevSpring, a healthcare billing and payments company from 2017 to 2019; as Group President for Fiserv (NASDAQ: FISV) from 2006 to 2017 and as President for eFunds (NYSE: EFD) from 2002 to 2006. In addition, Mr. Gupta has launched several startup companies in the payments and marketing spaces, built technology businesses for Fidelity Investments, and served numerous consulting clients for PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

Other board experience (current): Mitek (NASDAQ: MITK), SavvyMoney, Amount. Inc., Exact Payments and Capital Good Fund

Other board experience (prior): Cardtronics plc (formerly NASDAQ: CATM) from 2020 to 2021; Paylease, LLC from 2019 to 2021 and Ncontracts from 2018 to 2020.

Provides: Over 37 years of experience in the financial services and payments industries and significant experience in fintech venture and private equity 

Age: 60

Director Since: 2014

Thomas M. Hagerty

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: Managing Director of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., a leading private equity firm, since 1994

Other board experience (current): Black Knight, Inc. (NYSE: BKI) (not standing for re-election), Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (NYSE: CDAY), Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE: FNF), and Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:DNB)


Provides: Managerial and strategic expertise developed by working with and enhancing value at large, growth-oriented companies; expertise in corporate finance; substantial public company board experience

Age: 52

Director Since: 2020

Archie L. Jones, Jr.

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: Managing Director of Six Pillars Partners, a private equity firm investing in high-growth companies, and a Professor at Harvard Business School; prior executive positions at private equity, public and private companies including NOWaccount Network Corporation, IBM, Kenexa (NYSE: KNXA) and Parthenon Capital; Certified Public Accountant and graduate of Morehouse College and Harvard Business School

Other board experience (current): Project Evident

Provides: Managerial expertise in the financial institutions industry; expertise in mergers and acquisitions

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

15


03.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Age: 71

Director Since: 2010

Richard Macchia

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Administration for Internet Security Systems, Inc., an information security provider, from 1997 through October 2006, when it was acquired by International Business Machines Corporation; senior executive roles, including as principal financial officer and accounting officer, with several public companies, including with MicroBilt Corporation, a financial information services company, and First Financial Management Corporation, a company providing credit card authorization, processing and settlement services and other enterprise solutions; Partner in the audit and assurance practice of KPMG

Provides: Over 20 years of experience in the financial and information services industry and significant audit and accounting background 

Age: 67

Director Since: 2017

Hala G. Moddelmog

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: President & CEO of the Woodruff Arts Center, which enriches the lives of more than 800,000 patrons annually, including more than 170,000 students and teachers, making the Woodruff Arts Center the largest arts educator in the state of Georgia; prior President & CEO of the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce; prior President of Arby’s Restaurant Group, Inc., a division of Wendy’s/Arby’s Group, Inc. (NYSE: WEN); President & CEO of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the world’s largest breast cancer organization; CEO of Catalytic Ventures, LLC, a business that evaluated investment opportunities in foodservice, franchising and multi-unit retail; and President of Church’s Chicken

Other board experience (current): Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: LW)

Other board experience (prior): Amerigroup Corporation (NYSE: AGP) from 2009 to 2012; AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (NYSE: AHS) from 2008 to 2010 and a number of non-profit boards of directors

Provides: Over 20 years leading and enhancing value at high-growth companies including through M&A; expertise in marketing; experience as an executive of large public companies; community ties and extensive board experience 

Age: 55

Director Since: 2013

Jeffrey S. Sloan

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: CEO of Global Payments Inc., a leading international payments technology company since 2013; prior Executive positions with Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., including Partner and the worldwide head of Goldman’s financial technology group

Other board experience (current): Global Payments Inc. (NYSE: GPN); Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce; Atlanta Committee for Progress

Provides: 28 years of experience in the financial services and payments industries; financial acumen and experience as a public company executive 

162023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


03.CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Lead Independent Director
Age: 64

Director Since: 2000

Steven T. Stull

Featured experience, qualifications and attributes: CEO and Co-Founder of Advantage Capital Partners, a private equity firm, overseeing investments in the technology, financial and information services industries, since 1992; prior Investment executive with a large insurance company; Chief financial officer of an information services company and other career experience in financial institutions

Provides: Deep experience in investments and the financial services business 

Evaluation and Evolution of Our Board

As part of our focus on shareholder value, we regularly evaluate the performance of our Board and its committees and engage in self-evaluation process. We also evaluate the mix of experience, expertise and tenure of our individual directors. Our corporate governance guidelines reflect this approach. We believe our directors’ diverse backgrounds help us to make the most of opportunities and to effectively manage risk. We believe that our efforts have and will continue to result in a board and management focused on delivering exceptional value to our shareholders.

Board Meetings and Committees

The Board held five meetings in 2022 and each director attended at least 75% of all Board and applicable committee meetings during the year. Our independent directors meet regularly in executive session at each scheduled in-person

Board meeting. These sessions are led by independent directors selected on a rotating basis, who report the results of the independent sessions to the CEO and, if appropriate to other members of senior management.

Through 2022, our Board had five standing committees: an audit committee; a compensation committee, a nominating and corporate governance committee referred to as our governance committee; an executive and acquisitions committee; an information technology and security committee. As described above, we entered into the Cooperation Agreement in March 2023, pursuant to which we formed an ad hoc strategic review committee. The table below provides current membership for each of the Board committees.

Each committee meets at least quarterly, except the executive and acquisitions committee and strategic review committee, which meets as needed when matters within its charter arise. Our Board has adopted charters for the committees, which are available on our website at https://investor.FLEETCOR.com.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

17


03. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Board Committee Membership

Audit

Compensation

Nomination

& Governance

Executive &
Acquisitions

Information
Technology
& Security

Strategic
Review

Annabelle BexigaMM
Michael BuckmanMM
Ronald F. ClarkeCC
Joseph W. FarrellyMC
Rahul GuptaMM
Thomas M. HagertyCMM
Archie L. Jones, Jr.MMM
Richard MacchiaC, FM
Hala G. ModdelmogMC
Jeffrey S. SloanMMM
Steven T. StullMM

C = Chair          M = Member          F = Financial Expert

Audit Committee

The audit committee currently consists of Messrs. Buckman, Jones and Macchia and is chaired by Mr. Macchia. The audit committee held five meetings in 2022. The Board determined that each member of the audit committee is independent under the NYSE rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, and has determined that Mr. Macchia qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

The audit committee’s primary responsibilities include:

appointing and overseeing independence of and all other aspects of our relationship with our independent registered accountants

reviewing and monitoring our accounting principles and policies, and our financial and accounting controls and compliance with regulatory requirements

overseeing the financial reporting process and reviewing our interim and annual financial statements

establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission of concerns regarding questionable accounting, internal controls or auditing matters

approving all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent accountants

reviewing and approving related-party transactions

Compensation Committee

The compensation committee currently consists of Messrs. Farrelly, Hagerty and Stull and Ms. Moddelmog and is chaired by Mr. Hagerty. The compensation committee held six meetings in 2022. The Board has determined that each compensation committee member is independent under the NYSE rules for compensation committee members.

The compensation committee’s primary responsibilities include:

annually reviewing and approving the goals, objectives and specific levels of our executive compensation programs

reviewing and approving employment, severance and change in control arrangements

administering our executive incentive plans

reviewing and approving policies related to executive compensation, including stock ownership guidelines, clawback policy and hedging/pledging policy

selecting our independent compensation consultant

The compensation committee may from time to time delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the compensation committee.



182023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


03. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a description of the processes and procedures of the compensation committee, the committee’s role, and the role of our executive officers and the compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant, in determining or recommending the amount or form of compensation for executive officers and directors.

Nomination and Governance Committee

The governance committee currently consists of Messrs. Jones, Gupta and Stull and Ms. Moddelmog and is chaired by Ms. Moddelmog. The governance committee held four meetings in 2022.

The governance committee’s primary responsibilities include:

overseeing succession planning

developing and recommending criteria for selecting new directors

evaluating individuals and qualifications to become directors

recommending nominees for committees of the Board

assisting the Board with matters concerning corporate governance practices

overseeing ESG initiatives and considerations

The governance committee may from time to time delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee.

Executive and Acquisitions Committee

Our executive and acquisitions committee currently consists of Messrs. Clarke, Hagerty, Jones and Sloan and is chaired by Mr. Clarke. The executive and acquisitions committee held no meetings in 2022, as all acquisitions were discussed with the full Board. The executive and acquisitions committee is responsible for addressing important Company matters, including capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions, dispositions and financing activities, that the Chairman of the Board determines should be addressed before the next scheduled meeting of the Board.

Information Technology and Security Committee

Our information technology and security committee consists of Messrs. Farrelly, Buckman, Macchia and Sloan and Ms. Bexiga, and is chaired by Mr. Farrelly. The information technology and security committee held four meetings in 2022. The information technology and security committee is responsible for providing oversight and leadership for our information

technology security and cybersecurity, planning processes, policies and objectives. In furtherance of this role, the primary purpose of the committee is to review, assess and make recommendations regarding the long-term strategy for global information security and the evolution of our technology in a competitive environment.

To  accomplish this purpose, the information technology and security committee has five primary responsibilities:

understanding the security controls and assessments conducted on our major payment platforms and comparing same to industry best practices

evaluating strategies to protect our intellectual property

assessing opportunities to update our processing platform strategies to ensure the long term effective and efficient use of our resources

reviewing progress on significant IT security and cybersecurity projects and evaluating effectiveness of projects

overseeing our disaster recovery and business continuity plans

Strategic Review Committee

As described above, we entered into the Cooperation Agreement in March 2023, pursuant to which we formed an ad hoc strategic review committee. Our strategic review committee currently consists of Messrs. Clarke, Hagerty, Gupta and Sloan and Ms. Bexiga, and is chaired by Mr. Clarke. The strategic review committee is responsible for the consideration of a possible separation of one or more businesses of the Company, whether by sale, spin-off or split-off or other transaction.

Board Leadership

Our corporate governance guidelines provide that our Board will include a majority of independent directors. Our CEO serves as the Chairman of the Board and has served as such since 2003. While we believe this leadership structure has been effective, since 2020 a Lead Independent Director has served as a representative of the independent, non-employee directors of the Board and exercise additional powers and responsibilities in connection with Board meetings. The Lead Independent Director will serve a one-year term, which expires at each annual meeting of shareholders. Mr. Stull has served as Lead Independent Director since 2020, with his term ending at the annual meeting. The Board expects that, if elected at the annual meeting, Mr. Stull will be appointed to serve another term as Lead Independent Director until the 2024 annual meeting.



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement19


03. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

The Lead Independent Director has the following powers and responsibilities:

preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present

preside over executive sessions of the non-employee directors

serve as liaison between the non-employee directors and the Chairman and the CEO

call meetings of non-employee directors, with appropriate notice

coordinate with the Chairman and CEO on meeting schedules, agendas and information provided to the Board

be available for consultation with significant shareholder if so requested and

exercise and perform such other powers and duties as may be assigned to the Lead Independent Director by the Board from time to time

Our corporate governance guidelines provide that our non-management directors will meet in executive session, without management present, as frequently as they deem appropriate, and they typically meet in executive session at the time of each regular Board meeting. The Lead Independent Director presides during the meeting of independent directors, and acts as a liaison between the non-management directors and the chairman and CEO in connection with each regular meeting.

We believe that having a combined chairman and CEO, balanced with a Lead Independent Director, as well as a Board otherwise comprised solely of independent directors who meet regularly in executive session and independent chairs for the Board’s audit committee, compensation committee and governance committee and information technology and security committee provides an effective form of Board leadership and an appropriate balance between strategy development and independent oversight. The Board believes that having our CEO serve as Chairman of the Board facilitates the Board’s decision-making processes because Mr. Clarke possesses detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing the Company and its business. Accordingly, he is best positioned to develop agendas that ensure the Board’s time and attention is focused on the most critical matters. The combined role enables decisive leadership, ensures accountability and enhances our ability to communicate our message and strategy clearly and consistently to our shareholders, employees and customers.

Risk Oversight

Our Board, together with its committees, is responsible for overseeing our risk management. The chair of each committee reports to the full Board the significant risks facing the Company, as identified by management, and the measures undertaken by management for controlling and mitigating those risks.

The audit committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the annual internal audit plan, our major financial and compliance risk exposures, steps taken to monitor and control such exposures, risk management and risk assessment policies, significant findings and recommendations and management’s responses. In addition, our internal audit function routinely performs audits on various aspects of operational risks and reports the results quarterly.

The compensation committee considers risks associated with our compensation policies and practices, with respect to both executive compensation and compensation generally.

The nomination and governance committee is responsible for succession planning, governance structure and processes, ESG initiatives and considerations, legal and policy matters with potential significant reputational impact and shareholder concerns.

The information technology and security committee focuses on risks associated with information technology and security, such as cybersecurity, security controls, technology initiatives and intellectual property protection. The information technology and security committee conducts reviews at least quarterly to oversee the efficacy of cybersecurity risk initiatives and related controls, policies, procedures, training, preparedness and governance structure. The Board and the information technology and security committee directed the formation of a cross-functional cybersecurity council at the Company, and receive regular cybersecurity reports from the global CIO, the corporate CIO and the chief information security officer, among others.

Our Board, with input from the various committees and senior management, regularly engages in discussing the most significant risks and how the risks are being managed. Our management team is responsible for identifying and working with the Board to manage business risk and design a risk framework, including setting boundaries and monitoring risk appetite. We believe that our leadership structure, as described above, supports the risk oversight function of the Board.



202023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


03. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Director Independence

Our corporate governance guidelines provide that a majority of our directors will be independent. Our Board has adopted director independence guidelines to assist in determining each director’s independence. These guidelines are included in our corporate governance guidelines available on our website at https://investor.FLEETCOR.com. The guidelines exceed the independence requirements of the NYSE. Under the director independence guidelines and NYSE rules, the Board must annually review each director’s independence and affirmatively determine a director has no relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

The Board has analyzed the independence of each director and determined that, except for our CEO, they each meet the standards of independence under our director independence standards, and applicable NYSE listing rules, including that each member is free of any relationship that would interfere with their individual exercise of independent judgment. 

2022 Director Compensation

The non-employee members of our Board receive compensation for serving as directors. Our Board believes restricted stock awards are an appropriate form of compensation for our directors because the value of the grants increases as the value of our stock price increases, aligning the interests of these directors with those of our shareholders.

Annual grants for director service for 2022 had a target value at grant of approximately $300,000. The amount of these grants was determined based on our Board’s general experience with market levels of director compensation. In addition, the Board approved a cash payment in the amount of $75,000 for each independent committee Chair serving in such capacity in January 2022 (Messrs. Farrelly, Hagerty, Macchia and Stull and Ms. Moddelmog). The decision to provide cash compensation is reviewed on an annual basis. All members of our Board are reimbursed for actual expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board meetings. Mr. Clarke does not receive any compensation for service on our Board.

Our corporate governance guidelines set forth an expectation that all non-employee directors will hold at least a specified dollar amount of common shares or equity interests within five years of becoming a director. In 2019, our Board increased the stock ownership guideline from $150,000 to $1,250,000. Based on the closing stock price on December 31, 2022, eight of our non-employee directors are currently in compliance with this guideline and we expect that our three newest directors will meet the guideline within five years, as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

NameFees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($)(2)Total ($)
Michael Buckman$300,074$300,074
Joseph W. Farrelly$75,000$300,074$375,074
Thomas M. Hagerty$75,000$300,074$375,074
Mark A. Johnson (1)$300,074$300,074
Archie L. Jones, Jr.$300,074$300,074
Richard Macchia$75,000$300,074$375,074
Hala G. Moddelmog$75,000$300,074$375,074
Jeffrey S. Sloan$300,074$300,074
Steven T. Stull$75,000$300,074$375,074

(1) Ms. Bexiga was appointed to the Board effective January 27, 2023, replacing Mr. Johnson; and Mr. Gupta was appointed to the Board effective March 15, 2023.

(2) Consisted of shares of restricted stock, which vested on January 24, 2023. The value for stock awards in this column represents the grant date fair value, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. On December 31, 2022, each non-employee director had 1,331 shares of restricted stock outstanding.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement21


03. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Director Qualifications

The qualifications for directors are described in our corporate governance guidelines, which is available on our website.

The Boarddoes notcurrently apply any minimum qualifications or require that a director have specified qualities or skills in order to be considered for a position as a director. The Board recognizes the value of diversity among its members and the impact it can have on the performance of the Board. In addition to a director’s professional experience that will benefit our business, we seek to have a Board which represents diversity in professional experiences, viewpoints, gender, age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, nationality and cultural background.

Our corporate governance guidelines provide that no director should serve on more than four other public company boards, unless the governance committee determines otherwise.

Directors are expected to advise the Chairman of the Board and the governance committee Chair in advance of accepting an invitation to serve on another public company board.

The Board has not limited the number of years for which a person may serve as a director or require a mandatory retirement age, because such limits could deprive us of the valuable contributions made by a director who develops, over time, significant insights into us and our operations.

The re-nomination of existing directors is not viewed as automatic, but is based on continuing qualification under the criteria stated above. In addition, the committee considers the existing directors’ performance on the Board and any committee.

Director Nomination Process

Selection of Director Nominees: Our governance committee is responsible for evaluating candidates for election or appointment to our Board based on the criteria discussed above. The governance committee considers candidates identified by it, other directors, executive officers and shareholders, and, if desired, a third-party search firm. The committee selects nominees to recommend to the Board, which considers and makes the final selection of director nominees and directors to serve on its committees.

In addition, as outlined above, pursuant to the terms of the Cooperation Agreement, in March 2023 we agreed to nominate Mr. Gupta and agreed to add a second new director.

Shareholder Recommendations of Nominees:

The governance committee of the Board considers recommendations for candidates for nomination to the Board by shareholders. The governance committee will consider and evaluate candidates recommended by shareholders in the same manner as candidates recommended from other sources. If the Board determines to nominate a shareholder-recommended candidate and recommends his or her election, then that nominee will be named in the proxy statement for the next annual meeting.

Shareholder recommendations must be addressed to:

FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.

Attention: Corporate Secretary

DIRECTOR CANDIDATE RECOMMENDATION

3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 2400

Atlanta, Georgia 30305



222023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


03. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Proxy Access Nominations:Our Bylaws establish procedures for nominations by eligible shareholders of candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting and to have those nominees included in our proxy materials. To  be timely for consideration at our 2024 annual meeting, a shareholder’s proxy access notice to the corporate secretary regarding a proxy access director nomination must be received no earlier than November 28, 2023, and no later than December 28, 2023. However, in the event that the 2024 annual meeting is called for a date that is not within thirty days of June 9, 2024, notice by the shareholder must be received by no later than the tenth day following the date of the public announcement.

Shareholder proxy access nominations must be addressed to:

FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.

Attention: Corporate Secretary

PROXY ACCESS DIRECTOR NOMINEE

3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 2400

Atlanta, Georgia 30305

Contacting the Board:Shareholders and other interested parties can contact the Board as a group or the non-management directors as a group as follows:

For the Board as a whole: FLEETCORBoard@FLEETCOR.com

For the non-management directors: FLEETCORNonManagementDirectors@FLEETCOR.com

The Corporate Secretary reviews all written and emailed correspondence received from shareholders and other interested parties and forwards such correspondence periodically to the directors if and as appropriate. Shareholders can submit communications anonymously or by identifying themselves.

Governance Policies

Complete copies of our corporate governance guidelines, committee charters and code of conduct are available on the Corporate Governance section of our website, at https://investor.FLEETCOR.com. In accordance with NYSE rules, we may also make disclosure of the following on our website:

the method for interested parties to communicate directly with the presiding director or with the independent directors as a group

the identity of any member of our audit committee who also serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies and a determination by our Board that such simultaneous service will not impair the ability of such member to effectively serve on our audit committee

contributions by us to a tax exempt organization in which any independent director serves as an executive officer if, within the preceding three years, contributions in any single fiscal year exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of such tax exempt organization’s consolidated gross revenues

We will provide copies of any of the foregoing information without charge upon written request to:

FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Attention: Corporate Secretary
3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 2400

Atlanta, Georgia 30305



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement23


04.INFORMATION REGARDING BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS,SHAREHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the common shares beneficially owned by our directors, our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our next three most highly compensated executive officers, whom we refer to as our “named executive officers” or NEOS, and all persons known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding common shares, as of February 17, 2023. Percentages are based on 73,491,592 shares outstanding as of February 17, 2023.

Name and Address(1)

Common Shares
Beneficially
Owned(2)

Right to
Acquire(3)

Total(4)

Percent(4) of
Outstanding
Shares(5)

The Vanguard Group (6)
100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

8,188,8818,188,88111.14%

Blackrock, Inc.(7)

55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055

5,357,207

5,357,207

7.29%

Orbis Investments (8)

Orbis House, 25 Front Street,
Hamilton, Bermuda HM11

4,821,926

4,821,926

6.56%

Wellington Management Company LLP (9)
280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

4,641,692

4,641,692

6.32%

Directors and NEOs:

    
Ronald F. Clarke (10)1,973,9502,125,0004,098,9505.4%
Alissa B. Vickery (11)1,84825,74127,589*
Charles Freund (12)24,58529,55954,144*
John S. Coughlin (13)4,717131,547136,264*
Alexey Gavrilenya (14)4,959161,647166,606*
Alan King(15)19,23067,57286,802*
Armando L. Netto (16)32,892154,705187,597*
Annabelle Bexiga (17)2,4952,495*
Michael Buckman (18)22,13622,136*
Joseph W. Farrelly (19)15,62815,628*
Rahul Gupta (20)*
Thomas M. Hagerty (21)8,8128,812*
Mark A. Johnson (22)85,96685,966*

242023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

 
 

iii







FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
5445 Triangle Parkway
Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092
PROXY STATEMENT FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD FEBRUARY 7, 2018
This Proxy Statement will first be mailed to Stockholders on or about December 29, 2017. It is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (“FleetCor” or the “Company”), to be voted at the Special Meeting of Stockholders for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders.
04.INFORMATION REGARDING BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, AND MANAGEMENT

Name and Address(1)

Common Shares
Beneficially
Owned(2)

Right to
Acquire(3)

Total(4)

Percent(4) of
Outstanding
Shares(5)
Archie L. Jones Jr. (23)2,9692,969*
Richard Macchia (24)14,24714,247*
Hala G. Moddelmog (25)6,6396,639*
Jeffrey S. Sloan (26)14,17614,176*
Steven T. Stull (27)26,38626,386*

Directors and executive
officers as a group

(17 Persons)

2,261,635

 

2,695,771

 

4,957,406

 

6.5%

 

(1) The Special Meeting of Stockholders will be held at 10:00 a.m. on February 7, 2018 at our corporate offices at 5445 Triangle Parkway, Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on December 28, 2017 will be entitled to vote at the meeting on the basis of one voteaddress for each share held. No cumulative voting rights are authorized. On December 28, 2017, there were 89,753,989individual listed is 3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 2400, Atlanta, Georgia 30305.

(2) Unless otherwise noted, includes shares of common stock outstanding.


SUMMARY
FleetCor is holding a special meeting of stockholders on Wednesday, February 7, 2018, to ask stockholders to approve the FleetCor Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the “A&R Plan”).
The A&R Plan increases the shares of common stock available for grant to our employees and directors by 3,500,000 shares.
In connection with the Say on Pay vote at FleetCor’s 2017 Annual Meeting and since that time, the Board and management have reached out to stockholders and requested feedback on our executive compensation program. As a result, no awards from the 3,500,000 shares will be granted to FleetCor’s Chairman & CEO, Ron Clarke, in 2018 and 2019.
The A&R Plan adds several plan enhancements, such as one year minimum vesting requirements, further prohibitions on “liberal share recycling,” and new limits on annual individual grants to non-employee directors.
The A&R Plan also continues to follow a number of best practices such as disallowing stock options that automatically “reload” upon exercise of previously-granted stock options, prohibiting the repricing, replacement, or regranting of options and SARs without stockholder approval if the effect would be to reduce the exercise price, prohibiting cash buyouts of underwater awards, prohibiting the granting of options or SARs with an exercise or base price less than 100% of fair market value on grant date, and several other best practices described below.
The Company’s grant practices have been at or below industry norms - the potential dilution from outstanding and future potential awards (or “overhang”) is approximately 13.6%, with the 3,500,000 share increase, which is within customary levels for our peer group, the Company’s three-year average equity grant share usage (or “burn rate”) for 2014 through 2016 was equal to 1.77% and for 2015 through December 28, 2017 was equal to 2.12%, which is below customary levels for the software and services industry. We estimate that the 3,500,000 share reserve will be sufficient to accommodate 3 to 4 grant cycles / years.
As of December 28, 2017, 277,821 shares remain available for grant. If we do not obtain stockholder approval of the A&R Plan, we expect this share reserve will be exhausted in the first quarter of 2018.
The Company would like to be able to make grants to certain existing key employees, which typically occur in the first calendar quarter, to reward 2017 performance or incent performance for fiscal year 2018.
Equity-based compensation for key employees is customary among public companies and is critical to our ability to remain competitive within our industry.
Equity awards also serve to align the interests of our key employees with those of our stockholders - focusing our employees on driving stockholder value accretion and further linking pay with performance.
For these reasons the Board recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of the A&R Plan.


1






PROPOSALS
PROPOSAL 1. APPROVAL OF THE FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN, INCLUDING AN INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF SHARES AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE PLAN
Introduction
The Company previously adopted the FleetCor Technologies, Inc. 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”), which became effective upon the completion of the initial public offering of the Company’s common stock. The 2010 Plan was subsequently amended and restated effective May 30, 2013 (the “2013 Plan”), pursuant to which the number ofnamed person has sole voting and investment power or has shared voting and investment power with his or her spouse. This column excludes shares of the Company’s common stock available for future grants under the 2013 Plan was increased from 6,750,000 shares to 13,250,000 shares. The shares reserved under the 2013 Plan have nearly been exhausted. The Company would like to be able to attract key talent in the first quarter of 2018, prior to the time of the 2018 annual meeting. The Company also would like to be able to make grants to certain existing key employees, which typically occur in the first calendar quarter, to reward 2017 performance or incent performance for fiscal year 2018. The Board and the compensation committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) have determined that it is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders to amend and restate the 2013 Plan, establishing the A&R Plan. The A&R Plan will increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance of future grants by 3,500,000 shares, allowing us to continue to attract, motivate, and retain key talent and align their interests with those of our stockholders. The A&R Plan also incorporates several other plan enhancements as noted below.
Our Board approved the A&R Plan on December 20, 2017, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, subject to stockholder approval. We are now asking our stockholders to approve the A&R Plan, and the A&R Plan will not become effective if stockholder approval is not received. If we do not obtain stockholder approval of the A&R Plan, then once we exhaust the current share reserve under the 2013 Plan, we will lose access to an important compensation tool that is key to our ability to attract, motivate, reward, and retain our key employees and directors. As of December 28, 2017, only 277,821 shares remain available for grant, and we expect this share reserve to be exhausted in the first quarter of 2018, so we have limited ability to attract, retain and incent key employees unless we receive approval of the A&R Plan. In connection with last year’s Say on Pay vote and since that time, members of the Compensation Committee and management have reached out to stockholders to seek feedback regarding our Company’s executive compensation policies. In response to stockholder feedback, and to help manage the duration of the requested additional shares in the A&R Plan, no equity grants from the additional 3,500,000 shares will be made to our Chairman & CEO Ron Clarke over the next two years (2018 and 2019).
As of December 15, 2017, our stock has appreciated by approximately 254% over the past 5 years since December 31, 2012, and by approximately 598% since the time of our initial public offering on December 15, 2010. In contrast, over the same time periods the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Index appreciated approximately 88% each over 5 years and approximately 115% and 117%, respectively, over the 7 years since our initial public offering. Our Board believes that equity grants have played an important role in focusing our key employees and directors on long-term stockholder value creation. The A&R Plan will allow us to grant equity long-term incentive compensation awards to our key employees and directors. Our Board believes that the effective use of equity long-term incentive compensation awards is vital to our ability to attract, retain, reward, and motivate our key employees and directors. Our Board believes that this, in turn, helps us achieve our growth objectives and enhance stockholder value. Stockholder approval of the A&R Plan will allow us to continue to provide these incentives.
Key Reasons Why You Should Vote to Approve the A&R Plan
Our Board recommends that you approve the A&R Plan for the following reasons:
Recruitment and Retention.The A&R Plan will enable us to attract, retain, motivate and reward our key employees.
Alignment with Stockholder Interests and Pay-for-Performance.Equity awards serve to align the interests of our key employees with those of our stockholders, focus our key employees on driving stockholder value accretion, and further link pay with performance.
Plan Enhancements.As noted below, the A&R Plan adds a number of plan enhancements, such as minimum vesting requirements, further prohibitions on “liberal share recycling”, and new limits on annual individual grants for non-employee directors.
Competitive Advantage.We view equity awards as a crucial component of our compensation program, which enable us to remain competitive within our industry, as equity-based compensation for executives is customary among public companies.
Reasonable Share Reserve.We are seeking to reserve a number of shares for issuance pursuant to the A&R Plan that we believe is reasonable and that we estimate would be sufficient to accommodate approximately three to four annual grant cycles based on our historical and anticipated grant practices, the current value of our stock, and the fact that no awards from the 3,500,000 shares will be granted to our Chairman & CEO Ron Clarke over the next two years (2018 and 2019).

2






Key Features of the A&R Plan
We believe that the A&R Plan reflects a broad range of compensation and governance best practices, with some of the key features as follows:
No Liberal Share Recycling.The A&R Plan is not subject to liberal share “recycling” provisions, meaning (among other things) that shares used to pay the exercise price of stock options, and shares tendered or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations with respect to an award, do not again become available for grant.
No “Reload” Stock Options. The A&R Plan does not permit grants of stock options with a “reload” feature that would provide for additional stock options to be granted automatically to a participant upon the participant’s exercise of previously-granted stock options.
Minimum Vesting Requirements.No award granted under the A&R Plan may vest prior to the first anniversary of the applicable grant date, subject to limited exceptions noted below and in Section 3.6 of the A&R Plan.
Director Grant Limit. No director in any calendar year may be granted awards which have an aggregate fair value in excess of $500,000.
CEO Grant Prohibition. The A&R Plan provides that no awards from the 3,500,000 shares will be granted to our Chairman & CEO Ron Clarke over the next two years (2018 and 2019).
No Repricing or Replacement of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”). Options and SARs granted under the A&R Plan may not be repriced, replaced or re-granted through cancellation or modification without stockholder approval if the effect would be to reduce the exercise price for the shares under the award. Cash buyouts of underwater awards are not permitted.
No In-the-Money Option or SAR Grants.The A&R Plan prohibits the grant of options or SARs with an exercise or base price less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
No Dividend Payments on Unvested Awards. Dividends and dividend equivalents in respect of unvested stock grants are not paid unless and until such awards vest. Dividends or dividend equivalents are not payable with respect to options or SARs.
No “Evergreen” Provision. The total number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the A&R Plan is limited to the share reserveacquired through stock option exercises.

(3) This column includes shares that is subject to stockholder approval. That is, the A&R Plan does not include an automatic share replenishment provision (also known as an “evergreen” provision).

No Increase to Shares Available for Issuance without Stockholder Approval. The A&R Plan prohibits any increase in the total number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the A&R Plan without stockholder approval, other than adjustments in connection with certain corporate reorganizations, changes in capitalization and other events, as described below.
No Single-Trigger Accelerated Vesting; No Gross-Ups.Under the A&R Plan, there is no single-trigger accelerated vesting in connection with a change in control where the awards are continued or the acquirer assumes the awards or grants substitute awards. Further, the A&R Plan does not provide for excise tax gross-ups.
Share Reserve
Under the 2013 Plan, 13,250,000 shares of common stock were originally reserved for issuance (the “2013 Plan Reserve”). All shares of the 2013 Plan Reserve are available for grant as incentive stock options or non-incentive stock options, but a maximum of 3,194,550 shares of the 2013 Plan Reserve may be issued with respect to past and future stock grants. As of December 28, 2017, only 277,821 shares remain in the 2013 Plan Reserve available for future grants, of which 277,821 shares can be made in the form of futureacquired through stock grants. As of December 28, 2017, the market value for our common stock was $193.38 per share.
If the A&R Plan, as described in Proposal 1 above, is approved by stockholders, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance of grants under the A&R Plan would increase by 3,500,000 shares (the “Share Increase”) to 16,750,000 shares. Therefore, the sum of the Share Increase, plus the 277,821 shares remaining in the 2013 Plan Reserve as of December 28, 2017, or 3,777,821 shares, would be available for future grants. To allow greater flexibility in terms of future grant practices, the additional reserve of 3,500,000 shares may be granted in the form of any award type authorized under the A&R Plan, including stock options, stock grants, and performance shares. To date, most grants have been made in the form of stock options. Going forward, the Compensation Committee may decide to increase the emphasis on Stock Grants, including performance-contingent equity grants to senior executives, to help manage share usage and potential dilution under the A&R Plan and to further strengthen the linkage between senior executive pay and Company performance.
In its determination to approve the A&R Plan and the requested Share Increase, the Board sought to ensure that the Company would have an available pool of shares from which to grant such awards for a reasonable period of time into the future. The Board believes these awards serve a key incentive and retention mechanism for the Company’s key employees and directors.

3






In determining the Share Increase under the A&R Plan, the Board reviewed the Compensation Committee’s recommendations, which were made in consideration of information and analysis prepared by Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. Specifically, the Compensation Committee considered the following:
Share Dilution / Overhang.The Compensation Committee considered the potential dilution from outstanding and future potential equity awards (“overhang”) both in absolute terms and relative to industry peers. At the end of fiscal 2016, approximately 9.5 million shares were subject to outstanding awards or remained available for future grants of awards, which represented approximately 10.3% of ouroption exercises through April 18, 2023.

(4) This column includes common shares, outstanding, or our overhang percentage. Total overhang asrestricted shares, and shares that can be acquired through stock option exercises through April 18, 2023.

(5) *Less than 1%

(6) This information was reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 9, 2023 on behalf of nine affiliated Vanguard entities.

(7) This was reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Blackrock, Inc. with the endSEC on February 3, 2023 on behalf of 19 affiliated Blackrock entities.

(8) This information was reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Orbis Investment Management Limited (“OIML”); Orbis Investment Management (U.S.), L.P. (“OIMUS”) and Allan Gray Australia Pty Limited (“AGAPL”), with the third quarter in fiscal 2017 is approximately 10.0%, which is within customary levels for our peer group. If our stockholders approveSEC on February 14, 2023, on behalf of 3 affiliated Orbis entities.

(9) This information was reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Wellington Management Group LLP with the A&R Plan, the additional 3,500,000 shares proposed to be added to the share reserve would increase our overhang percentage to approximately 13.6% total. The Company has no warrants or convertibles.

AsSEC on February 14, 2023 on behalf of December 28, 2017, outstanding grants under our existing equity compensations plans, including shares remaining available for grant thereunder, are provided in the table below:
Stock Options Outstanding8,088,393
Stock Awards Outstanding364,637
Common Stock Outstanding89,753,989
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Stock Options Outstanding$109.20
Weighted Average Contractual Life of Stock Options Outstanding6.89 years
Total Shares Available for Grant Under Existing Plan277,821
Basic Burn Rate. Expressed as a percentage offour affiliated Wellington entities.

(10) Includes 1,973,950 common shares outstanding, the Company’s three-year average equity grant share usage or burn rate for 2014 through 2016 was equaland vested options to 1.77% and for 2015 through December 28, 2017 was equal to 2.12%, which is below customary levels for the software and services industry. Actual grants and weighted averagepurchase 2,125,000 shares.

(11) Includes 956 common shares, outstanding used to calculate the basic burn rate are provided in the table below:

Fiscal Year Options Granted Restricted Stock Granted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding Basic Burn Rate 3 Year Average Basic Burn Rate
2017 2,884,838
 238,365
 91,136,467
 3.43% 2015 - 2017 = 2.12%
2016 1,779,949
 152,206
 92,597,286
 2.09% 
           
2015 654,166
 126,015
 92,023,168
 0.85% 2014 - 2016 = 1.77%
2014 1,544,084
 466,633
 84,317,473
 2.38% 
Share Usage. If the A&R Plan is approved, we estimate that the shares reserved for issuance thereunder would be sufficient for approximately three to four years of awards, assuming we grant awards consistent with our current projections. Of course, we cannot predict future share usage with certainty, and circumstances may change and require us to reevaluate and modify our equity grant practices. However, based on the foregoing, we expect that we would not require an additional increase to the share reserve under the A&R Plan until 2020 or 2021 (primarily dependent on hiring activity and award levels during the next few years, as well as terminations and forfeitures), noting again that this timeline is an estimate and the share reserve under the A&R Plan could actually last for a longer or shorter period of time, depending on future circumstances, which we cannot predict with certainty at this time.
In light of the factors described above, and the fact that our ability to continue to grant equity compensation is vital to our ability to continue to attract and retain key personnel in the labor markets in which we compete, the Board has determined that the size of the requested Share Increase to the reserve under the A&R Plan is reasonable and appropriate at this time.
Stockholder Approval Requirement
Stockholder approval of the A&R Plan is necessary in order for us to (1) meet the stockholder approval requirements of the NYSE and (2) retain the ability to grant incentive stock options (“ISOs”).
The A&R Plan will become effective on the date on which it is approved by stockholders.
Description of the A&R Plan
The following description of the A&R Plan is a summary of the material provisions of the A&R Plan and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable provisions of the A&R Plan, which is attached as Appendix A.

4






Shares Available. The sum of the Share Increase, plus the 277,821 shares remaining in the 2013 Plan Reserve, or a total of 3,777,821 shares, are available for future grants under the A&R Plan.
All shares reserved for issuance shall remain available for issuance under the A&R Plan until issued pursuant to the exercise of any option or stock appreciation right, or issued pursuant to a stock grant. The A&R Plan’s share reserve shall be reduced on a one-to-one basis when any shares are issued pursuant to the exercise of any option or stock appreciation right, or issued pursuant to a stock grant. Any shares of common stock issued pursuant to a stock grant which are forfeited will be added back to the A&R Plan’s share reserve and will again be available for grants under the A&R Plan. The following shares will not be added back to the A&R Plan’s share reserve and will not be available for future grants:
any shares issued or otherwise used to satisfy any tax withholding obligation;
any shares which are tendered to the Company to pay the option price of an option or which are tendered to the Company in satisfaction of any condition to a stock grant;
any shares that were subject to a stock-settled SAR that were not issued upon the exercise of such SAR; and
any shares that are purchased by the Company with proceeds from the exercise of an option.
Administration. The Compensation Committee, or a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee, will administer the A&R Plan. The Compensation Committee has the discretionary authority to interpret the A&R Plan and to take such other action in the administration and operation of this Plan as the Compensation Committee deems equitable under the circumstances, which action shall be binding on all parties. All grants under the A&R Plan will be evidenced by a certificate that incorporates such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee (or its subcommittee) deems necessary or appropriate.
Types of awards. The A&R Plan provides for the following types of awards to certain eligible employees and outside directors: stock options; stock grants; and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”). Under the A&R Plan, stock options may be ISOs or non-incentive stock options (“non-ISOs”). All shares of common stock available for issuance under the A&R Plan may be issued as ISOs or non-ISOs.
Eligibility. The Compensation Committee may grant options, SARs or stock grants to key employees and to outside directors; provided that options that are intended to qualify as ISOs may only be granted to employees of FleetCor or a subsidiary or parent of FleetCor. “Key employee” means any employee of FleetCor or any subsidiary or parent or affiliate to whom the Compensation Committee decides for reasons sufficient to the committee to make a grant under the A&R Plan. During 2016, awards were granted to approximately 153 key employees and to 8 outside directors. As of December 28, 2017, there were approximately 196 employees who could be considered key employees and 8 outside directors eligible to participate in the A&R Plan.
Grant limits. The A&R Plan imposes the following grant limits:
Overall maximum annual grant limits: No eligible employee in any calendar year may be granted options, SARs, and/or stock grants which in the aggregate are with respect to more than 1,000,000 shares of stock, subject to limited exceptions as noted below and in Section 13 of the A&R Plan.
Special grant limits applicable to the CEO Ron Clarke: During the 2018 and 2019 calendar years, none of the Share Increase will be used to grant options, SARs, or stock grants to the Chairman & CEO Ron Clarke.
Director annual grant limits: No outside director in any calendar year may be granted options, SARs and/or stock grants which have an aggregate fair value in excess of $500,000, determined under applicable accounting standards as of the date of the grant.
Minimum Vesting requirement. Any option, SAR or stock grant granted by the Compensation Committee after the effective date of the A&R Plan (the “Effective Date”) shall be subject to a minimum vesting period of not less than one year from the date the option, SAR or stock grant is awarded. However, the foregoing minimum vesting period shall not apply in connection with (a) a “change in control” (as defined in the A&R Plan), (b) a key employee terminating employment due to death or disability or a director ceasing service due to death or disability, (c) a substitute award granted in connection with corporate transactions that do not reduce the vesting period of the award being replaced, or (d) options, SARs or stock grants, which in aggregate cover a number of shares not to exceed five (5%) of the total number of shares of stock available for issuance under the A&R Plan as of the Effective Date. For the purposes hereof, “disability” shall mean a physical or mental incapacity which impairs the individual’s ability to substantially perform his or her duties for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days, as determined by the Committee based on information provided to it. Any employment agreement or other agreement with a key employee or director which provides for the acceleration in vesting inconsistent with the requirements of this minimum vesting requirement shall not apply with respect to any option, SAR or stock grant granted on or after the A&R Plan’s Effective Date.
Options. Options may be granted by the Compensation Committee to eligible employees and outside directors under the A&R Plan, and may be granted for any reason the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, including as a substitute for compensation otherwise payable in cash. Each option will be evidenced by a certificate setting set forth whether the option is an ISO or a non-ISO and such other

5






terms and conditions of such grant as the Compensation Committee deems consistent with the terms of the A&R Plan. All shares available for issuance under the A&R Plan shall be available for issuance as either ISOs or non-ISOs. No option will provide for the automatic grant of a new option upon the exercise of such option, and if an option holder is granted both an ISO and a non-ISO, his or her right to exercise the ISO cannot be conditioned on his or her failure to exercise the non-ISO. The exercise price for options granted under the A&R Plan may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the option grant date. The Compensation Committee will not (except for adjustments as permitted by the A&R Plan in connection with a corporate transaction or change in control) take any action without stockholder approval to directly or indirectly reduce the exercise price of any outstanding option or to make a tender offer for any option if the exercise price exceeds the then fair market value of our common stock. Option recipients may, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, pay the exercise price by using cash, check, stock or through an approved cashless exercise procedure. Subject to the minimum vesting period discussed above, options vest at the time or times determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may require completion of a period of service as an eligible employee or outside director and/or satisfaction of a performance requirement before an option may be exercised. Options will expire at a time determined by the Compensation Committee, but in no event more than ten years after they are granted. At the Compensation Committee’s discretion, the option certificate may provide for the exercise of an option after an employee’s or director’s status has been terminated for any reason whatsoever, including death and disability.
Tax limitations on ISOs. The aggregate fair market value, determined at the time of grant, of shares of our common stock with respect to ISOs that are exercisable for the first time by an option-holder during any calendar year under all of our stock plans may not exceed $100,000. No ISO may be granted to any person who, at the time of grant, owns or is deemed to own stock possessing more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of the Company, or of any subsidiary or parent of the Company unless (a) the option exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the ISO on the date of grant and (b) the term of the ISO does not exceed five years from the date of grant.
Stock appreciation rights. SARs may be granted by the Compensation Committee to eligible employees and outside directors under the A&R Plan, either as part of an option or as standalone SARs. SARs may be granted for any reason the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, including as a substitute for compensation otherwise payable in cash. SARs entitle the holder to receive the appreciation of the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date such right is exercised over the baseline price specified in the option or SAR certificate (the “SAR Value”), multiplied by the number of shares of common stock in respect of which the SAR is being exercised. The SAR Value for a SAR must equal or exceed the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date. The terms and conditions for a SAR granted as part of an option will be set forth in the option certificate for the related option, while the terms and conditions for a standalone SAR will be set forth in a SAR certificate. Where a SAR is granted together with an option, (i) the number of892 shares subject to the SAR shall be no more than the number ofvesting requirements and options to purchase 24,635 shares, under the related option, (ii) the SAR Value shall be no less than the option price under the related option, (iii) upon the exercise of the SAR, the rightand options to exercise the related option shall be cancelled,purchase 1,106 shares vesting within 60 days.

(12) Includes 24,585 common shares and upon the exercise of a related option, the rightvested options to exercise the SAR shall be cancelled,purchase 29,559 shares.

(13) Includes 4,717 common shares and (iv) a SAR granted as a part of an option shall be exercisable only while the related option is exercisable. Subjectvested options to the minimumpurchase 131,547 shares.

(14) Includes 4,959 common shares and vested options to purchase 161,647 shares.

(15) Includes 17,594 common shares, vested options to purchase 59,951 shares, options to purchase 7,621 shares vesting period discussed above, the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may require completion of a period of service as an eligible employee or outside director and/or satisfaction of a performance requirement before a SAR may be exercised. At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, any payment due upon the exercise of a SAR can be made in cash or in the form of common stock. The Compensation Committee will not (except for adjustments as permitted by the A&R Plan in connection with a corporate transaction or change in control) take any action without stockholder approval to directly or indirectly reduce the SAR Value of any outstanding SAR or to make a tender offer for any SAR if the SAR Value exceeds the then fair market value of our common stock.

Stock grants. Stock grants may be granted by the Compensation Committee to eligible employeeswithin 60 days, and outside directors under the A&R Plan, and may be granted for any reason the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, including as a substitute for compensation otherwise payable in cash. Each stock grant shall be evidenced by a certificate which will specify what rights, if any, an eligible employee or outside director has with respect to such stock grant as well as any conditions applicable to the stock grant. A stock grant may be issued in the form of “stock awards”, “performance shares”, or “performance units”. Subject to the minimum vesting period discussed above, a stock award may provide for a contractual right to the issuance of stock to eligible employees and outside directors only after the satisfaction of specific employment or performance or other terms and conditions set by the Compensation Committee or may provide for the issuance of stock to eligible employees and outside directors at the time the grant is made, and any stock issued pursuant to a stock award may be issued1,636 restricted shares subject to the satisfaction of specific employment or performance or other vesting terms and conditions which, if not satisfied, will result in the forfeiture of the stock issuedrequirements.

(16) Includes 29,821 common shares, vested options to the eligible employee or director. A “performance share” will have an initial value equalpurchase 108,439 shares, options to the fair market value of a share of stock on the date of grant. A “performance unit” will have an initial value that is established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. The Compensation Committee will set performance goals which, depending on the extent to which they are met during the performance period, and the satisfaction of applicable service-basedpurchase 46,266 shares vesting conditions, will determine the number or value of the performance shares or performance units that will vest (which number or value may be greater than the target number of performance shares or performance units granted to an eligible employee or director) and be paid to the eligible employee or director. At the close of the performance period, any earned performance shares will be paid in stock, and any earned performance units will be paid in the form of cash, stock, or a combination, unless otherwise specified in the stock grant certificate.


6






The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may make the issuance of common stock under a stock grant and/or the vesting of such stockwithin 60 days subject to certain conditions. These conditions may include, for example, a requirement that the eligible employee continue employment or the outside director continue service with us for a specified period or that we or the eligible employee achieve stated performance or other conditions. If stockvesting requirements, and 3,071 restricted shares subject to a share grant is issued before the eligible employee’s or director’s interest in such share of stock vested and is non-forfeitable, the Company shall have the right to condition any such issuancevesting requirements.

(17) Appointed director on the employee or director first signing an irrevocable stock power in favor of the Company in order for the Company to effect any forfeiture called for under the related stock grant certificate. If a dividend is paid in cash with respect to a share issued under a stock grant but before the first date that the employee’s or director’s interest in such share is vested, the Company shall delay the payment of such cash dividend until his or her interest in such share is vested. An employee or director shall have the right to voteJanuary 27, 2023. Includes 2,495 restricted shares of stock issued under his or her stock grant prior to the date the employee’s or director’s interest in such share becomes vested.

The Compensation Committee will determine whether stock grants under the A&R Plan are subject to the achievement of performance goals based on one or more of the following performance measures: (1) our return over capital costs or increase in return over capital costs, (2) our total earnings or the growth in such earnings, (3) our consolidated earnings or the growth in such earnings, (4) our earnings per share or the growth in such earnings, (5) our net earnings or the growth in such earnings, (6) our earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortizationvesting requirements.

(18) Includes 20,639 common shares and other non-cash items or the growth in such earnings, (7) our earnings before interest and taxes or the growth in such earnings, (8) our consolidated net income or the growth in such income, (9) the value of our stock or the growth in such value, (10) our stock price or the growth in such price, (11) our return on assets or the growth in such return, (12) our cash flow or the growth in our cash flow, (13) our total stockholder return or the growth in such return, (14) our expenses or the reduction in such expenses, (15) our sales growth, (16) our overhead ratios or changes in such ratios, (17) our expense-to-sales ratios or changes in such ratios, (18) our economic value added or changes in such value added, (19) our gross margin or growth in such gross margin, or (20) our bad debt expense or the reduction in such bad debt expense. A performance goal may be set in any manner determined by the Compensation Committee, including looking to achievement on an absolute or relative basis in relation to peer groups or indexes, and the Compensation Committee may set more than one goal. No change may be made to a performance goal after the goal has been set. However, the Committee may express any goal in terms of alternatives, or a range of alternatives, as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate under the circumstances, such as including or excluding (1) any acquisitions or dispositions, restructuring, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and other unusual or non-recurring charges, (2) any event either not directly related to the operations of the Company or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management or (3) the effects of tax or accounting changes.

Section 162(m) of the Code generally imposes a $1,000,000 cap on the compensation that a public company may deduct in respect of compensation paid to its “covered employees”. Prior to January 1, 2018, any amounts that qualified under the “performance-based compensation” exception under Section 162(m) of the Code were excluded from the $1,000,000 cap. In order to constitute qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, in addition to certain other requirements, the stock awards had to be conditioned upon the attainment of pre-established, objective performance goals set by the Compensation Committee and based on one or more stockholder-approved performance measures. For purposes of the A&R Plan, any stock grant that the Compensation Committee intended to constitute qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code established objective performance goals based on one or more of the above performance measures in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to use the above-listed performance measures with respect to stock grants that are not intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates the performance-based compensation exception beginning January 1, 2018. However, the Act provides a transition rule with respect to remuneration which is provided pursuant to a written binding contract which was in effect on November 2, 2017 and which was not materially modified after that date. The Compensation Committee shall administer any awards granted prior to November 2, 2017 which qualify as “performance-based compensation” under § 162(m) of the Code, as amended by the Act, in accordance with the transition rules applicable to binding contracts in effect on November 2, 2017, and shall have the sole discretion to revise the A&R Plan to conform with such Law Changes and the Compensation Committee’s administrative practices, all without obtaining further stockholder approval.
Transfer of awards. During an employee’s or director’s lifetime, an option or SAR shall (absent the Compensation Committee’s consent) be exercisable only by the employee or director.No award shall be transferable otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution without the consent of the Compensation Committee, and any person or persons to whom an option or SAR is transferred by will or by the laws of descent and distribution will be treated as the employee or director.
Change in control. Pursuant to the A&R Plan, all conditions to the exercise of outstanding options and SARs, and all conditions to the issuance or forfeiture of outstanding stock grants, will be deemed satisfied as of the effective date of the change in control, if as a result of a change in control:
all of the outstanding options, SARs and stock grants granted under the A&R Plan are not continued in full force and effect or there is no assumption or substitution of the options, SARs and stock grants (with their terms and conditions unchanged) in connection with such change in control; or

7






solely with respect to an option, SAR or stock grant that was granted prior to the Effective Date of the A&R Plan, the terms of an option certificate, SAR certificate or stock grant certificate expressly provide that this provision applies to the grant made under such certificate even if there is such a continuation, assumption, or substitution of such grant or the A&R Plan.
In this case, our Board of Directors shall have the right to deem at the time of the change in control any and all terms and conditions to the exercise of all outstanding options and SARs on such date and any and all outstanding issuance and vesting conditions under any stock grants on such date be 100% satisfied on such date, and our Board of Directors shall also have the right, to the extent required as a part of a change in control transaction, to cancel all outstanding options, SARs and stock grants after giving eligible employees and outside directors a reasonable period of time to exercise their outstanding options and SARs or to take such other action as is necessary to receive common stock1,497 restricted shares subject to stock grants.
The A&R Plan also provides that if outstanding options, SARsvesting requirements.

(19) Includes 14,131 common shares and stock grants are continued in full force and effect or there is an assumption or substitution of the options, SARs and stock grants in connection with a change in control, then, except as expressly provided in any option certificate, SAR certificate or stock grant certificate granted prior to the Effective Date of the A&R Plan, any conditions to the exercise of an eligible employee’s or director’s outstanding options and SARs and any issuance and forfeiture conditions of outstanding stock grants will automatically expire and have no further force or effect on or after the date that the employee’s or director’s service terminates, if:

the employee’s employment with FleetCor is terminated at our initiative for reasons other than “cause” (as defined in the A&R Plan) or is terminated at the employee’s initiative for “good reason” (as defined in the A&R Plan) within the two-year period starting on the date of the change in control; or
an outside director’s service on our Board of Directors terminates for any reason within the two-year period starting on the date of the change in control.
A change in control means, generally:
any sale by us of all or substantially all of our assets or our consummation of any merger, consolidation, reorganization or business combination with any person, except for certain transactions to be described in the A&R Plan;
the acquisition by any person, other than certain acquisitions to be specified in the A&R Plan, of 30% or more of the combined voting power of our then-outstanding voting securities;
the “incumbent directors” (as defined in the A&R Plan) cease for any reason (other than ordinary course events, such as death or retirement situations), to constitute at least a majority of the members of the Board; or
stockholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution, other than as will be provided in the A&R Plan.
Adjustment of shares. In the event of (a) any equity restructuring, change in the capitalization of our company (including, but not limited to, spin offs, stock dividends, large non-reoccurring cash or stock dividends, rights offerings or stock splits), or (b) any transaction described in Code Section 424(a) which does not constitute a change in control, the Compensation Committee shall adjust in a reasonable and equitable manner, the number, kind or class of1,497 restricted shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the A&R Plan, the annual grant caps, the number, kind or class of shares of common stock subject to options or SARs granted under the A&R Plan,vesting requirements.

(20) Appointed director on March 15, 2023.

(21) Includes 7,315 common shares and the option price of the options and the SAR Value of the SARs, as well as the number, kind or class of1,497 restricted shares of common stock granted pursuant to stock grants under the A&R Plan, in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of each such outstanding option, SAR and stock grant immediately before such restructuring or recapitalization or other transaction.

Adjustment of shares-mergers. The Compensation Committee, as part of any transaction described in Code Section 424(a) which does not constitute a change in control under the A&R Plan, shall have the right to adjust the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the A&R Plan without seeking approval of our stockholders, unless such approval is required by applicable laws or rules of the stock exchange. In connection with any such transaction, the Compensation Committee will also have the right to make stock, option and SAR grants to effect the assumption of, or the substitution for, stock, option and SAR grants previously made by any other corporation to the extent that such transaction calls for the substitution or assumption of such grants, without regard to any grant limits set forth in the A&R Plan.
Amendments or termination. Our Board of Directors may amend the A&R Plan at any time, provided, that no amendment shall be made (a) absent the approval of the stockholders of the Company to the extent such approval is required under applicable law or stock exchange rules, or (b) which might adversely affect any rights that would otherwise vest on a change in control with respect to awards granted prior to the date of any such amendment. The Board also may suspend granting options or SARs or making stock grants or terminate this Plan at any time, provided that the Board cannot unilaterally modify, amend or cancel any option, SAR or stock grant unless the holder consents in writing to such modification, amendment or cancellation or there is a dissolution or liquidation of the Company or a change in control of the Company. The A&R Plan will terminate on the earlier of (1) the tenth anniversary of the date our stockholders approve the A&R

8






Plan and (2) the date upon which all of the stock reserved for use under the A&R Plan has been issued or is no longer available for use under the plan. No option, SAR or stock grant may be granted after the date the A&R Plan terminates.
Stockholder rights. Key employees and directors will not have any rights to dividends or other rights of a stockholder as a result of the grant of an option or a SAR until the common stock subject to such option or SAR is actually delivered to such key employee or director. Key employeesvesting requirements.

(22) Includes 85,966 common shares.

(23) Includes 1,472 common shares and directors who hold1,497 restricted shares issued under a stock grant will have the right to vote such shares prior to the date such shares vest, but any dividends paid with respect such shares shall not be paid until such shares are vested.

Federal Income Tax Consequences
The rules concerning the federal income tax consequences with respect to grants made pursuant to the A&R Plan are technical, and reasonable persons may differ on the proper interpretation of such rules. Moreover, the applicable statutory and regulatory provisions are subject to change, as are their interpretationsvesting requirements.

(24) Includes 12,750 common shares and applications, which may vary in individual circumstances. Therefore, the following discussion is designed1,497 restricted shares subject to provide only a brief, general summary description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences associated with such grants, based on a good faith interpretation of the current U.S. federal income tax laws, regulations (including certain proposed regulations)vesting requirements.

(25) Includes 5,142 common shares and judicial1,497 restricted shares subject to vesting requirements.

(26) Includes 12,679 common shares and administrative interpretations. The following discussion does not set forth (1) any U.S. federal tax consequences other than income tax consequences or (2) any state, local or non-U.S. tax consequences that may apply.

ISOs. In general, an eligible employee will not be taxed upon the grant or the exercise of an ISO. For purposes of the alternative minimum tax, however, the eligible employee generally will be required1,497 restricted shares subject to treat an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of ourvesting requirements.

(27) Represents 6,247 common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price as an item of adjustment in computing the eligible employee’s alternative minimum taxable income. If the eligible employee does not dispose of ourshares held by Advantage Capital Financial Company, LLC (“Advantage Capital”) and related entities, and 20,139 common stock received pursuant to the exercise of the ISO within either (1) two years after the date of the grant of the ISO or (2) one year after the date of exercise of the ISO, a disposition of our common stock generally will result in long-term capital gain or loss to the individualshares held by Mr. Stull. Mr. Stull has shared voting power with respect to the difference between the selling priceshares held by Advantage Capital and the exercise price. We will not be entitled to any federal income tax deduction as a result ofmay be deemed to beneficially own such disposition. In addition, we normally will not be entitled to a federal income tax deduction at either the grant or the exercise of an ISO.

If the eligible employee disposes of our common stock acquired upon exercise of the ISO within either of the two above-mentioned time periods, then in the year of disposition, the individual generally will recognize ordinary income, and we will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction (provided we satisfy applicable federal income tax reporting requirements). The amount of income and deduction will be an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the excess of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price or (2) the amount realized upon disposition over the exercise price. Any gain in excess of the amount recognized by the eligible employee as ordinary income will be taxed to the individual as short-term or long-term capital gain (depending on the applicable holding period).
Non-ISOs. An eligible employee or an outside director will not recognize any taxable income upon the grant of a non-incentive stock option, or Non-ISO, and we will not be entitled to a federal income tax deduction at the time of grant. Upon the exercise of a Non-ISO, the eligible employee or outside director generally will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of our common stock on the date the shares are transferred pursuant to the exercise over the exercise price.
We will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction (provided we satisfy applicable federal income tax reporting requirements) in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the eligible employee or outside director in the year that the income is recognized by the individual. Upon a later sale of our common stock by the eligible employee or outside director, he or she will recognize short-term or long-term capital gain or loss (depending on the applicable holding period) in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and the fair market valueshares. Mr. Stull disclaims ownership of the shares when ordinary income was recognized.
SARs. An eligible employee or outside director will recognize ordinary income for federal income tax purposes uponheld by the exercise of a SAR under the A&R Plan for cash, our common stock or a combination of each. The amount of income that the eligible employee or outside director will recognize will equal the amount of cash, if any, and the fair market value of our common stock, if any, that the eligible employee or outside director receives as a result of the exercise. We generally will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction in an amount equalAdvantage Capital entities except to the ordinary income recognized by the eligible employee in the same taxable year in which the eligible employee recognizes such income, if we satisfy applicable federal income tax reporting requirements.
Stock Grants. The amount an eligible employee or outside director will recognize as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes in connection with the grantextent of a stock award depends on the restrictions imposed on such shares. Generally, tax will be deferred until the first taxable year the shares are no longer subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. At the time the restrictions lapse, the eligible employee or outside director will recognize ordinary income equal to the then fair market value of the stock. However, the eligible employee or outside director may make a Section 83(b) election to include the value of the shares in income in the year the award is granted despite such restrictions; in such case, any subsequent appreciation in the value of the shares will be treated as a capital gain. If the stock award is forfeited, the eligible employee or outside director will recognize no income. If cash or stock dividends are paid on shares subject to

9






the stock award before the date the stock award becomes nonforfeitable, we will delay any payment of such cash or stock dividend to an eligible employee or outside director until the shares become nonforfeitable, and the cash or stock dividends will be treated as ordinary income (or dividend income, if a Section 83(b) election was made) in the year received. If the shares subject to the stock award are forfeited, any related cash or stock dividends will also be forfeited. Upon the initial grant of performance units or performance shares, an eligible employee or outside director generally will not incur any income tax liability. At the end of the performance period, however, the eligible employee or outside director will realize ordinary income on any amounts received in cash or shares of our common stock, and any subsequent appreciation on any shares of stock will be treated as a capital gain. Generally, we will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the eligible employee or outside director in the same taxable year in which he or she recognizes such income, if we satisfy applicable federal income tax reporting requirements.
Section 162(m). TheTax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), which became law on December 22, 2017, significantly amends Section 162(m) of the Code. Pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code, as amended, we may not deduct compensation of more than $1 million paid to the Company’s “covered employees,” which includes (i) any individual who at any time during the taxable year is either our principal executive officer or an employee whose total compensation for the tax year is required to be reported to our stockholders because he or she is among the three highest compensated officers for the tax year, other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer, and (ii) any person who was a covered employee at any time after December 31, 2016. Prior to January 1, 2018, certain grants may have qualified as “performance-based compensation” and, as such, would be exempt from the $1 million limitation on deductible compensation. The Act eliminated the performance-based compensation exception with respect to tax years beginning January 1, 2018. However, the Act provides a transition rule with respect to remuneration which is provided pursuant to a written binding contract which was in effect on November 2, 2017 and which was not materially modified after that date. The Compensation Committee shall administer any awards granted prior to November 2, 2017 which qualify as “performance-based compensation” under § 162(m) of the Code, as amended by the Act, in accordance with the transition rules applicable to binding contracts in effect on November 2, 2017, and shall have the sole discretion to revise the A&R Plan to conform with such Law Changes and the Compensation Committee’s administrative practices, all without obtaining further stockholder approval.
Plan Benefits
Benefits, if any, payable under the A&R Plan for 2018 and future years are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and are therefore not determinable at this time. Our executive officers and outside directors are eligible to receive awards under the Plan and, accordingly, have anhis pecuniary interest in this Proposal. The number of awards granted to each of our named executive officers during 2016them. Advantage Capital is set forth under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2016”, the number of awards granted to each of our outside directors during 2016 is set forth under “Compensation of Directors” and the number of awards granted to each of our named executive officers during 2017 is set forth under “2017 Compensation Decisions and Related Matters - 2017 Compensation Decisions.” During fiscal year 2016 and from January 1 through December 28, 2017, awards have been granted under the 2013 Plan to approximately 225 key employees and 8 outside directors.

10






Awards Granted to Certain Persons
The table below shows the number of awards granted under the 2013 Plan and its predecessor, the 2010 Plan, to the named executive officers and the other individuals and groups indicated under the 2013 Plan and its predecessor, the 2010 Plan, since its inception. The closing price of our common stock on December 28, 2017 was $193.38 per share.
  Stock Grants (shares)  Option Awards
Name and Position  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price
Ronald F. Clarke
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
 1,675,334
 2,941,665
 $76.60
Eric R. Dey
Chief Financial Officer
  111,508
 416,524
 $81.66
John S. Coughlin
Executive Vice President-Global Corporate Development
 61,500
 310,750
 $134.01
Charles Freund
Executive Vice President-Global Sales
  23,500
 416,524
 $81.66
Todd W. House (1)
President-North America Direct Issuing, U.S. Telematics and Efectivale
  32,500
 348,762
 $90.10
All Executive Officers, as a group (13 persons)  2,044,400
 6,019,529
 $99.68
All Non-Employee Directors, as a Group 108,591
 
 $
All Non-Executive Officer Employees, as a Group  564,701
 6,004,312
 $85.83
a private equity firm.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement25

(1)Mr. House was a named executive officer in 2016 but is no longer an executive officer of the Company as of July 1, 2017.

WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL
OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN.
OTHER BUSINESS
We know of no other business to be considered at the meeting and the deadline for stockholders to submit proposals or nominations has passed. However, if other matters are properly presented at the meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, and you have properly submitted your proxy, then Ronald F. Clarke or Eric R. Dey will vote your shares on those matters according to their best judgment.
2017 COMPENSATION DECISIONS AND RELATED MATTERS
Given that Proposal 1 relates to a compensation plan in which our executive officers and directors will participate, the Company is required under Item 8 of Schedule 14A to furnish executive compensation information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K and certain paragraphs of Item 407 of Regulation S-K related to our last completed fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. See the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

The discussion below describes compensation arrangements of our named executive officers for 2017 and certain other compensation-related decisions made in 2017 and supplements the discussion under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, as well as considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we adopt may differ materially from currently planned compensation decisions as summarized in this discussion.

Compensation Components
The Company’s Compensation Committee generally makes decisions regarding the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, including named executive officers, during the first quarter of each fiscal year. The executive officers discussed in this proxy statement are called the “named executive officers” or “NEOs,” who are listed below:

Ronald F. Clarke-Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Eric R. Dey-Chief Financial Officer

11






John S. Coughlin-Executive Vice President-Global Corporate Development
Charles Freund-Executive Vice President-Global Strategy
Todd W. House-President-North America Direct Issuing, U.S. Telematics and Efectivale
As described in the section of this proxy statement titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the compensation package for our executive officers consists of base salary, annual cash incentive compensation based on achievement of company and individual performance goals, long-term equity incentive awards, and benefits and perquisites. At the discretion of our Compensation Committee, executive officers may also receive discretionary bonus awards. The Compensation Committee did not award any discretionary bonuses in 2017.
2017 Say on Pay and Frequency Votes
At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“2017 Annual Meeting”), our stockholders were asked to cast non-binding advisory votes to (1) approve our executive compensation for our named executive officers for 2016 and (2) recommend the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. Approximately 37.3% of the votes cast by our stockholders were in support of the compensation of our named executive officers for 2016. In addition, approximately 78.8% of the votes cast by our stockholders were in favor of annual future say on pay votes.
In connection with the sentiment expressed by stockholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting and since that time, at the direction of the Compensation Committee, members of the Compensation Committee and management have been reaching out to stockholders to seek feedback regarding our Company’s executive compensation policies in order to inform future executive compensation decisions. This process is ongoing and thus far we have contacted stockholders who collectively held approximately 22% of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of September 30, 2017. While the feedback varied among stockholders, some common themes were an appreciation for the work of the Company’s executives and the returns generated for stockholders, general satisfaction with the compensation of named executive officers other than the CEO, concern on the part of some stockholders about the level of time-based options granted to the CEO, a preference on the part of some stockholders for earnings per share over total stockholder return as a performance criterion, and a preference among some stockholders for metrics tying long term incentive awards to longer term performance criteria.
The Compensation Committee also engaged Pearl Meyer to assist the committee with (1) a review of the 2017 Say on Pay voting results and CEO pay levels and to assist the Company with stockholder outreach considerations, (2) review and recommendations on changes to the 2013 Plan, and (3) recommendations for the 2018 executive compensation program design, taking into account the Company’s business strategy, competitive practice and stockholder engagement feedback.
This process is ongoing and the Company has set a goal of seeking feedback from stockholders owning at least 50% of our stock. In addition, the Compensation Committee has received initial advice and studies from Pearl Meyer but expects to conduct additional research and receive additional input from Pearl Meyer. Nevertheless, considering the feedback from stockholders and advice from Pearl Meyer thus far, the Compensation Committee has taken the following actions:
Recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, that future say on pay votes be held annually;
Proposed to include in the A&R Plan a restriction against making any grants from the 3,500,000 Share Increase to the Chairman & CEO Ron Clarke over the next two years; and
Approved the other changes to the A&R Plan described in Proposal 1 to enhance the A&R Plan, including the addition of share limits for directors, minimum vesting requirements, and prohibitions of payouts on dividends until the vesting of the underlying award.
The Compensation Committee also is studying the Company’s peer group and considering updating the peer group, as well as additional changes to named executive officer compensation, such as changes in vesting criteria for long-term incentive awards and changes in the mix of equity awards granted to named executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes the mix of changes implemented to date and under consideration for further changes will enhance our executive compensation practices and align executive compensation with our Company’s business and strategic objectives and maximize long-term stockholder growth.

12






2017 Compensation Decisions
2017 compensation decisions were made in January 2017, including base salary adjustments, bonus, and long-term equity incentives for our named executive officers. An additional long-term equity grant was provided to certain key employees, including our named executive officers (with the exception of Mr. Clarke), in May 2017. The Compensation Committee deemed this additional long-term equity award to be necessary to provide additional incentive to focus certain executives and key employees on stockholder value creation. With the exception of Mr. Dey’s June base salary increase and July grant of performance-based restricted stock, all compensation decisions were made prior to our 2017 Annual Meeting and Say on Pay vote, and prior to the associated stockholder outreach described above. It is with this in mind that the Compensation Committee has proposed to include in the A&R Plan a restriction against making any grants from the 3,500,000 Share Increase to the Chairman & CEO Ron Clarke over the next two years.
Compensation to our named executive officers in 2017 is described below:
Mr. Clarke’s compensation in 2017 is comprised of a base salary of $1,000,000, bonus target of $1,000,000, and stock awards of 50,000 performance-based restricted stock shares and 850,000 time-based stock options (granted on January 25, 2017).
Mr. Dey’s compensation in 2017 is comprised of a base salary of $500,000 (effective June 26, 2017), bonus target of $250,000, stock awards of 1,170 performance-based restricted stock shares and 88,000 time-based stock options (granted on January 25, 2017), 30,000 time-based stock options (granted on May 5, 2017), and 13,008 performance-based restricted stock shares (granted on July 26, 2017).
Mr. Coughlin’s compensation in 2017 is comprised of a base salary of $420,000, bonus target of $210,000, and stock awards of 1,170 performance-based restricted stock shares and 88,000 time-based stock options (granted on January 25, 2017), and 30,000 time-based stock options (granted on May 5, 2017).
Mr. Freund’s compensation in 2017 is comprised of a base salary of $365,000, bonus target of $182,500, stock awards of 1,170 performance-based restricted stock shares and 88,000 time-based stock options (granted on January 25, 2017), and 30,000 time-based stock options (granted on May 5, 2017).
Mr. House’s compensation in 2017 is comprised of a base salary of $420,000, bonus target of $210,000, stock awards of 1,170 performance-based restricted stock shares and 88,000 time-based stock options (granted on January 25, 2017), and 30,000 time-based stock options (granted on May 5, 2017). Mr. House is no longer an executive officer of the Company as of July 1, 2017.
2017 Company Performance
On the basis of total stockholder returns, as shown in the graph below, through December 15, 2017 FleetCor’s performance has continued to outperform the market. The following graph assumes $100 invested on December 15, 2010, at the closing price of our common stock on that day ($27.25), and compares (a) the percentage change of our cumulative total stockholder return on the common stock (as measured by dividing (i) the difference between our share price at the end and the beginning of the period presented by (ii) the share price at the beginning of the periods presented) with (b) (i) the Russell 2000 index, (ii) the S&P 500® Data Processing & Outsourced Services index, (iii) the S&P 500®, and (iv) the Dow Jones Industrial average.

13






annualperformancegraph5yra05.jpg

Period Ending 
FleetCor
Technologies, Inc.
 Russell 2000 
S&P Data
Processing and
Outsourced
Services
 S&P 500 Dow Jones Industrial Average
12/15/2010 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
12/31/2010 $113.03
 $102.78
 $95.88
 $101.83
 $100.98
12/31/2011 $109.61
 $96.43
 $117.85
 $101.81
 $106.63
12/31/2012 $196.88
 $110.54
 $150.85
 $115.46
 $114.37
12/31/2013 $429.98
 $151.44
 $228.94
 $149.64
 $144.68
12/31/2014 $545.72
 $156.79
 $256.74
 $166.68
 $155.56
12/31/2015 $524.51
 $147.83
 $283.80
 $165.47
 $152.08
12/31/2016 $519.34
 $176.63
 $300.42
 $181.25
 $172.49
12/15/2017 $697.65
 $199.18
 $426.96
 $216.62
 $215.16

FleetCor’s continued success is dependent upon its executive team. In order to adequately compensate the executive team and remain in line with market compensation levels, FleetCor is seeking stockholder approval of the A&R Plan.



14






05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Given that Proposal 1 relates to a compensation plan in which our executive officers and directors will participate, the Company is required under Item 8 of Schedule 14A to furnish executive compensation information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K and certain paragraphs of Item 407 of Regulation S-K related to our last completed fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. As such, below is the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and related compensation tables that were included in our Proxy Statement dated May 1, 2017.

The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below.

This compensation discussion and analysis describes the

Our compensation policies and programs, the material compensation decisions we have made under those programspolicies and policiesprograms, and the material factors that we have considered in making those decisions. decisions are described in this section. Following this section is a series of tables containing specific information about the compensation earned or paid in 20162022 to the following individuals. We individuals we refer to these individuals as our “named executive officers” or “NEOs” “NEOs” for purposes of this proxy statement. statement, who are our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), each individual who served as our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) during 2022, and certain other highly paid current and former executive officers, in accordance with SEC rules. The discussion below is intended to explain the detailed information provided in the executive compensation tables contained in this section and to put that information into context within our overall compensation program.

Our named executive officersNEOs for 20162022 were:

Ronald F. Clarke—

Name 

Position

Ronald F. ClarkeChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Alissa B. VickeryInterim Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer(1)
Charles R. FreundFormer Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Armando L. NettoGroup President, Brazil
Alan KingGroup President, Global Fleet
Alexey GavrilenyaFormer Group President, North America Fuel
John S. CoughlinFormer Group President, Corporate Payments

(1) As previously disclosed, we appointed Tom Panther as our Chief Financial Officer, effective May 12, 2023. We expect that Ms. Vickery will continue to serve as interim Chief Financial Officer until such date, at which point she will continue in her role as Chief Accounting Officer.

Leadership Transitions in 2022

On March 1, 2022, we announced the departure of Mr. Coughlin to pursue other opportunities. Mr. Coughlin remained with FLEETCOR as a senior advisor to help ensure a smooth transition of his responsibilities. On May 23, 2022, we announced the establishment of a new “global fleet organization,” combining our North America and International Fleet organizations into one. In connection with such change, Mr. King was promoted to lead the new combined global fleet organization, and Mr. Gavrilenya, former Group President North America fleet, ceased serving in that role. Mr. Gavrilenya remained with FLEETCOR as a senior advisor until December 31, 2022, to help ensure a smooth transition of his responsibilities.

On September 22, 2022, Mr. Freund notified FLEETCOR of his decision to resign as Chief Financial Officer effective October 3, 2022. Mr. Freund remained with FLEETCOR in a consulting capacity until December 31, 2022 to help ensure a smooth transition of his responsibilities. In connection with Mr. Freund’s departure, Ms. Vickery, our Chief Accounting Officer, was appointed to serve as our interim Chief Financial Officer.

Ms. Vickery’s compensation for 2022 was established prior to her appointment as our interim Chief Financial Officer. Therefore, certain elements of her 2022 compensation differ in design and magnitude from the compensation of our other NEOs.



262023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Navigating the Opportunities of 2022

2022 Performance

FLEETCOR is a leading global business payments company that helps businesses spend less by enabling them to better manage their expense-related purchasing and vendor payments processes. FLEETCOR’s smarter payment and spend management solutions are delivered in a variety of ways depending on the needs of the Board of Directors

Eric R. Dey—Chief Financial Officer
John S. Coughlin—Executive Vice President—Global Corporate Development
Charles Freund—Executive Vice President—Global Sales
Todd W. House—President—North America Direct Issuing, U.S.Telematicscustomer. From physical payment cards to software that includes customizable controls and Efectivale
2016 Executive Overview
As discussedrobust payment capabilities, we provide businesses with a better way to pay.

Our unique positioning and focus on performance drove our results in our Management Discussion and Analysis contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for 2016, we accomplished2022. We realized impressive performance the following:

Revenues, net of $1.832 billion, an increase of 8% over 2015.
Net income of $452.4 million, an increase of 25% over 2015.
with:

Revenue of $3.4 billion, which was up 21% and Adjusted net incomeEPS1 of $659.2 million, an increase of 11% over 2015.
$16.10, also up 22%.
Net income per diluted share

Both of $4.75, an increase of 23% over 2015.

which were all-time record highs for the Company

Adjusted net income per diluted share1 of $6.92, an increase of 10% over 2015.
Organic revenue growth for 2022 was 13%, which was the highest organic revenue growth rate that we’ve ever reported

Since our IPO in December2022 sales were up 21% versus 2021, which are the most important driver of 2010, the Company has grown adjusted net income per diluted share (on a pro forma basis in 2010)1 over the prior year 31%, 38%, 35%, 27%, 22% and 10% in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
growth

Exited the fourth quarter of 2016 with over $2$1.2 billion of run rate revenues, net1, 20% higher than the same time in 2015.
capital deployed for acquisitions and stock buybacks

Acquired STP

We meaningfully advanced our “beyond strategy” in 2022, extending both the product set and served customer segments in each of our major businesses. These beyond extensions increase our TAM, and better position our LOB for $1.3 billion, the second largest business acquisition in the Company’s history, a significant success that furthers the Company’s position in the Brazil tolls market, as well as three smaller acquisitions for approximately $75 million.

Grew the Company’s stock pricelong term growth. Some highlights from $27.25 on December 15, 2010 to $141.52 on December 31, 2016, an increase of over 419%, leading our sector, and besting the S&P 500 by over 330% and the Russell 2000 by over 340%.
Our performance has helped drive our Company’s strong total stockholder returns that have benefited our stockholders and outperformed our competitors. We show below the annual revenue, adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share growth since our initial public offering in 2010 and the relative growth during the presented time periods. Performance charts follow.
______________________
2022 include:

In Global Fleet, we significantly advanced our Electric Vehicle (EV) capabilities, and the concept of “defensive” and “offensive” EV initiatives

1
Non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of adjusted net incomeIn Brazil, we expanded our tag fueling solution to more accepting sites and adjusted net income per diluted sharemore users, and we launched a new vehicle insurance offering, which enjoyed rapid acceptance

In Corporate Payments, we added AP automation workflow software to our GAAP numbers is provided on page 71 offull AP payment solution, and further scaled our Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, as well ascross-border footprint in Appendix A to this proxy statement for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (2010 on a pro forma basis). The $2 billion of revenues, net run rate is calculated as fourth quarter 2016 revenues, net provided on page 109 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 multiplied by four.Europe

15






annualnetincomegraphimage.jpgannualnetincomegraphimagea01.jpgannualadjustednetincomegraph.jpg 

*Note: 2010 is reflected on a pro forma basis (to exclude the impact of a one-time charge related to stock comp expenseIn Lodging, we further expanded our two new verticals, airlines and to reflect the impact of public company expenses, loss on extinguishment of debt, non-cash compensation expenses associatedinsurance, with our stock plan and an increaseeach reaching almost $100M in the effective tax rate, effective during 2011).revenue
FleetCor has grown profitability measured

We are squarely focused on the future, as net incomewe’ve captured more of the corporate payments value stream, and adjusted net income per diluted share at a compounded annual growth rate of 27% and 30%, respectively, sincepotential with our initial public offering. This financial performance has resulted in significant increase in value to our stockholders and the overall valuerecent acquisitions. Today, Corporate Payments revenue represents 25% of the Company since our initial public offering, resultingand is growing 20% year-over-year. We expect to capture much more business as the transition to newer, improved AP Automation processes gains steam.

And in significantly greater returns than any other Company in our sector, as well as compared to Russell 2000 index, S&P 500 ® Data Processing & Outsourced Services index, S&P 500 ® index and Dow Jones Industrial average.

marketcapgraphimage.jpg
Note: Market cap is defined as basic shares of common stock outstanding multiplied by year-end share price.

16






Relative to our peers within our performance based peer group, FleetCor has consistent earnings before income taxes (“EBIT”), with exceptional revenue to EBIT ratio, and asEVs; while a result is valued at the topsmall part of our performance peer group.business today, we believe the EV transition provides a big opportunity to expand the fleet business beyond our core, commercial fleet offering. We are the global leader in comprehensive mixed fleet solutions in the UK, and we’re now in market with our 3 in 1 solution for commercial fleet clients. This includes a public EV charging network, at home charging software for EVs, and of course ICE (internal combustion engine) fueling, which are all integrated into one solution.

On the basis


2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement27


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Responsiveness to 2022 Say-On-Pay Vote

Our say-on-pay proposal at our 2022 Annual Meeting of stockholder returns, FleetCor’s performance has also been outstanding. The following graph assumes $100 invested on December 30, 2011, at the closing priceShareholders received approximately 35% approval. During 2022, we undertook engagement efforts to receive shareholder feedback regarding matters of importance to shareholders. Our engagement process included not only representatives of our common stock onexecutive team, but also our compensation committee Chair and additional Board members.

After we mailed our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we contacted our largest 10 shareholders as of December 31, 2021 (excluding our CEO) who at that day ($29.87), and compares (a) the percentage changetime held approximately 50.3% of our cumulative total stockholder returnoutstanding common shares in the aggregate. Based on the common stock (as measured by dividing (i) the difference between our share price at the endoutreach efforts and the beginningour review of the period presented by (ii) the share price at the beginningrecommendations of the periods presented) with (b) (i) the Russell 2000 index and (ii) the S&P 500® Data Processing & Outsourced Services index, (iii) the S&P 500® and (iv) the Dow Jones Industrial average.

annualgraphcda5yra04.jpg
Period Ending 
FleetCor
Technologies, Inc.
 Russell 2000 
S&P Data
Processing and
Outsourced
Services
 S&P 500 Dow Jones Industrial Average
12/31/2011 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
12/31/2012 $179.61
 $114.63
 $128.00
 $113.41
 $107.26
12/31/2013 $392.27
 $157.05
 $194.26
 $146.97
 $135.68
12/31/2014 $497.86
 $162.59
 $217.85
 $163.72
 $145.88
12/31/2015 $478.51
 $153.31
 $240.81
 $162.53
 $142.62
12/31/2016 $473.79
 $183.17
 $254.91
 $178.02
 $161.76
______________________
Pay for Performance
A fundamental principle underlying our compensation program is thatproxy advisory firms, we should pay for performance. In accordance with this principle,have identified a vast majorityfew key areas of executive pay is performance based and not guaranteed.
Our executive compensation programs are materially aligned with short and long-term Company performance. They incentivize and reward our executives for achievement of short-term goals aligned with the fiscal year operating plan (annual cash incentive program)

17






and achievement of long-term goals measured over a multi-year period (long-term equity incentive plan). In support of our long-term goals, we incentivize and reward our executives with performance-based restricted stock to be earned based on (1) multiple financial and performance measures (performance shares) and (2) our annual company-wide performance for achieving adjusted net income per diluted share (EPS shares). We believe the performance shares and EPS shares align the interests of executives with those of our stockholders. Also in support of our long-term goals, we incentivize our executives with time-based stock option awards, typically at the time of their hiring and when initial time based stock option awards are vested.
For our chief executive officer, as well as our other named executive officers, target achievement criteria under our short-term and long-term incentive programs in 2016 are performance-based, except for certain time-based stock option grants. However, we view these stock option grants as being performance-based, because they have no value to the executives unless our stock price increases. In addition, our long-term incentives are 100% stock-based, so that the value of the shares earned fluctuates with stock price during the performance and vesting periods, aligning our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. Executives are also subject to stock ownership guidelines, and the shares they are required to hold under that program also fluctuate with stock price.
As described above, our operating performance for 2016 continued to be strong, despite the unfavorable macroeconomic environment. This performance is reflected in the pay earned by the named executive officers in 2016.
In aggregate for fiscal year 2016, the named executive officers earned 125% of target for the annual cash incentive program, excluding guaranteed and other discretionary bonus amounts. These payouts were a result of achieving specific profitability, adjusted cash net income earnings per share, and individual goals set in February 2016.
In aggregate, executives earned approximately 80% of targets for the long-term equity incentive plan in connection with the performance based restricted share awards utilizing financial measures in 2016. The payouts were a result of achieving specific adjusted net income per diluted share “EPS” and personal performance goals, with certain awards containing additional time based vesting criteria. The value of the restricted awards changes as our stock price changes, thereby continuing to align executive and shareholder interests.
We continue to evaluate our plans each year against various sets of market data to further align our pay practices with performance to ensure that we pay for performance.
The Role of Say-On-Pay Vote and Stockholder Outreach Program
At our annual meeting of stockholders held in May 2014, a majority of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal did not support the proposal.
In order to determine the concerns of our stockholdersconcern with respect to our executive compensation program as disclosed in our 2022 Proxy Statement.

2019-2023 CEO Equity Compensation. During the chairmanfive-year period of 2019-2023, Mr. Clarke has been granted two long-term equity awards:

In 2019, 25,000 restricted stock performance shares with a grant date fair value of $9,473,750; and
In 2021, 850,000 performance-based stock options with stock price hurdles of $350 and $400, with a grant date fair value of $55,556,000.
Mr. Clarke has received no equity grants in 2020 and 2022, and has agreed to receive no long-term equity compensation in 2023.

As of April 17, 2023, Mr. Clarke has not realized any compensation from his 2019 and 2021 equity awards (see table below):

The 25,000 performance stock award from 2019 has been forfeited; and
The 850,000 performance stock option award from 2021 is “out-of-the-money”.

Meanwhile, the compensation committee engaged in investor outreach on behalf of the committee. During 2014, the committee chairman spoke with investors representing more than 25% of our outstanding shares to better understand investor perspectives.

The feedback in general requested clearer disclosure of equity award information and supporting considerations, while recognizing that disclosure must be made in a manner that would not reveal FleetCor confidential information. Investors generally did not express concern over the magnitude of executive compensation in light of the exceptionalprofit performance of the Company but some expressed concernsince 2019 has increased from $11.79 Adjusted EPS to $16.10 in Adjusted EPS for 2022. This suggests significantly better Company profit performance, than “equity compensation realized” for Mr. Clarke under equity awards that were granted during the same five-year period.



CEO Long-Term Equity Awards – 2019 through 2023

Fiscal Year 

Award Type

Target
Award

Grant Date Fair
Value Reported
in Summary

Compensation Table

Realized
Value as of
April 17, 2023

Adjusted
EPS

2019Performance Shares25,000$9,473,750$0$11.79
2020NONE$11.09
2021Performance Stock Options

850,000

$55,556,000$0$13.21
2022NONE$16.10
2023NONETBD

 

Total for Five-Year Period
(2019-2023) as of April
17, 2023:
$65,029,750$0 

282023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Performance Period for Non-CEO Equity Awards. We continue to grant performance-based equity compensation awards to our NEOs other than Mr. Clarke that are scored based on performance achievement over certainone-year performance goals andmeasurement periods. Our performance-based restricted stock unit awards, to the potential misperceptionextent earned, are subject to ratable vesting over a three-year service period, which we believe enhances our ability to retain talented executives.

Disclosure of Performance Targets. We continue to believe that the performance measures were not challenging enough, likely due to delays between the date the committee initially considered the performance goals and the date the performance goals were actually approved.

In lightdisclosure of the outcome of the vote and the stockholder outreach, the compensation committee continues to evaluate its approach to executive compensation, specificallycertain goal levels for our chief executive officer. The committee had engaged its compensation consultant to advise about ways to address investor concerns, including ways to implement a more even annual equity grant program. In addition, the Board determined to reconstitute the committee to bring it fresh perspectives. In November 2014, when Mr. Hagerty joined the Board, he also assumed the chairmanship of the compensation committee.
We provide our stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on executive compensation (a “say-on-pay proposal”) every three years. Therefore, the next say-on-pay vote is at this annual meeting. The compensation committee will continue to consider the outcome of our say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers. We welcome input from our stockholders on our compensation policies and compensation program at any time, not just in the years when we conduct a say-on-pay vote.
Our Compensation Philosophy
The compensation committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and implementing our compensation philosophy. Our compensation committee evaluates and determines the levels and forms of individual compensation for our executive officers.

18






Our compensation committee reviews and approves compensation for our executive officers periodically, generally in the first quarter of each fiscal year, based on each executive officer’s performance and our overall performance during the most recent fiscal year. The committee designs the program with the overall goal that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive and includes incentives that are designed to appropriately drive corporate performance. In addition, our chief executive officer plays a significant role in reviewing the performance of the other executive officers and making compensation recommendations to the compensation committee for the executive officers (other than himself).
Our executive compensation program is designed to help us attract talented individuals to manage and operate all aspects of our business, to reward those individuals for the achievement of our financial and strategic goals, to retain those individuals who contribute to the success of our business and to align the interests of those individuals with those of our stockholders. We believe thatNEOs’ annual cash incentive compensation should be linked to metrics that create value for our stockholders and the ownership by management of equity interests in our business is an effective mechanism for providing long-term incentives for management to maximize gains for stockholders. A fundamental principle underlying our compensation program is that we should pay for performance. In accordance with this principle, a vast majority of executive pay is performance based and not guaranteed.
Overview of Elements of Compensation
Our compensation program consists of the following five principal components:
Base salary. Base salaries for our named executive officers are reviewed annually.
Annual cash incentive compensation. Our named executive officers typically have the opportunity to earn annual cash incentive compensation based on (1) achievement of company-wide financial performance goals for the year and/or (2) achievement of individual or business unit performance goals.
Discretionary or guaranteed bonus. At the complete discretion of our compensation committee, with recommendations from our chief executive officer (other than for himself), our named executive officers may be awarded a discretionary bonus. In addition, we may agree to guaranteed bonuses with executive officers at the time of hire.
Long-term equity incentive awards. We grant equity awards to our named executive officers aswould cause us competitive harm.

Shareholder Outreach Generally

Our Board and management have taken a long-term incentives. We endeavor to align a significant portion of our named executive officers’ compensation to our ongoing success and with the returns provided to our stockholders.

Benefits and perquisites. We provide various health and welfare benefits to all of our employees. We provide a 401(k) plan to all of our U.S. employees. We also provide minimal perquisites to our named executive officers. Our named executive officers do not participate in any non-qualified deferred compensation plans or defined benefit pension plans.
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant
The compensation committee retained Mercer LLC (“Mercer”) as its compensation consultant in 2013 and 2014. The consultant takes guidance from and reports directly to the compensation committee. The consultant has advised the compensation committee on current and future trends and issues in executive compensation and on the competitiveness of the compensation structure and levels of our executives, including named executive officers. At the request of the compensation committee, and to provide context for the compensation committee’s compensation decisions, the consultant performed the following key services for the compensation committee during 2014:
Assessed the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation programs and long-term incentive design in relation to identified performance-based and industry-based peer groups and proposed a go-forward plan for key executives, including executive officers;
With input from the Company, constructed two peer groups for the compensation committee’s review: A performance-based group that consists of organizations with similar financial performance characteristics to the Company and an industry-based group that consists of organizations with similar businesses to that of the Company;
Conducted a market review and analysis for the named executive officers to determine whether their total targeted compensation opportunities were competitive with positions of a similar scope in similarly sized companies in similar industries;
Provided advice on undertaking an investor outreach program to engage with stockholders in light of the outcome of our say-on-pay vote; and
Attended compensation committee meetings at the request of the committee.
Compensation Consultant Conflict of Interest and Independence Assessment
In light of SEC and NYSE rules, we requested and received information from Mercer in 2013 and 2014, addressing independence and potential conflicts of interest, including the following factors: (1) other services provided to us by the consulting firm; (2) fees

19






paid by us as a percentage of the consulting firm’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by the consulting firm that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in theview toward shareholder engagement and a memberrecognize that solicitation and consideration of the compensation committee; (5) any company stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement;shareholder feedback is critical to driving growth and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the consulting firm or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. Based on an assessment of these factors, including information gathered from directors and executive officers addressing business or personal relationships with the consulting firm or the individual consultants, the compensation committee concluded that the work of Mercer did not raise any conflict of interest and that Mercer is independent.
Peer Groups
We considered the compensation levels, programs, and practices of peer companies to assist us in setting our executive compensation so that it is market competitive. The peer groups used by the compensation committee during 2016 for the establishment of certain 2016 compensation and subsequent years’ compensation were developed in conjunction with a compensation consultant in 2014, based on input from management and approved by the compensation committee.
We have identified two peer groups: a performance-based group that consists of organizations with similar financial performance characteristics to the Company and an industry-based group that consists of organizations with similar businesses to that of the Company. We believe that we compete for talent with companies in each of these peer groups. We believe that identification of peer groups both in our industry and with comparable performance and market capitalization is useful in analyzing our payment practices and compensation programs.
While we are comparable to other companies in our industry in terms of product offerings, we lead our industry and our sector in performance and total stockholder return during the past year, which can make it more challenging for the compensation committee and our stockholders to evaluate our compensation program as compared to our industry. Thus, we believe it is also useful to compare ourselves to companies with similar three year performance results, in addition to companies in our industry.
At the time the peer group was constructed, our performance based peer group was identified considering the sales, market capitalization, earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), EBIT margins and cash flow on a compounded annualized growth rate over three years of companies that also ranked in the top quartile for each of the performance metrics and companies with market capitalizations ranging from $8—$30 billion, targeting a medium market capitalization of approximately $10 billion. Industry was not a criterion for this peer group. Our identified performance based peer group and their financial performance are as follows:
 Sales Market Cap EBIT EBIT Margin
PVH Corp.$8,203
 $7,927
 $794
 10%
Affiliated Managers Group Inc.$2,215
 $9,204
 $705
 32%
B/E Aerospace Inc.$2,933
 $6,586
 $529
 18%
Equinix Inc.$3,612
 $30,979
 $619
 17%
United Rentals Inc.$5,762
 $10,617
 $1,608
 28%
Hollyfrontier Corp.$10,556
 $4,961
 $550
 5%
Sunoco Logistics Partners LP.$9,216
 $7,712
 $815
 9%
Colfax Corp.$3,647
 $4,921
 $323
 9%
Under Armour Inc.$4,825
 $7,527
 $420
 9%
Polaris Industries Inc.$4,517
 $5,165
 $350
 8%
Ulta Salon Cosmetics and Fragrances$4,855
 $17,810
 $655
 13%
Ocwen Financial Corp.$1,388
 $678
 $164
 12%
Median$4,671
 $7,619
 $584
 11%
FleetCor Technologies Inc.$1,832
 $13,368
 $754
 41%
___________________
Note: All financial data effective as of most recent fiscal year end or 12 month rolling data as was available.
Our industry based peer group was identified by considering publicly traded companies that have a business that is similar to the Company’s. At the time the peer group was constructed, our market capitalization (“market cap”) fell near the median of the group as a whole.

20






 Sales Market Cap EBIT EBIT Margin
Intuit Inc.$4,694
 $30,357
 $1555
 33%
Fidelity National Information Services$9,241
 $26,329
 $2,361
 26%
Fiserv Inc.$5,505
 $24,945
 $1,445
 26%
Alliance Data Systems Corp.$7,138
 $13,329
 $1,266
 18%
Western Union Co.$5,419
 $9,296
 $1,105
 20%
Total System Services Inc.$4,170
 $9,580
 $573
 14%
Global Payments Inc.$6,474
 $11,847
 $816
 13%
Henry (Jack) & Associates$1,355
 $7,264
 $342
 25%
Vantiv Inc.$3,579
 $10,163
 $833
 23%
Wex Inc.$1018
 $4,448
 $195
 19%
Verifone Systems Inc.$1,992
 $1,999
 $258
 13%
Median$4,694
 $10,163
 $833
 20%
FleetCor Technologies Inc.$1,832
 $13,368
 $754
 41%
____________________
Note: All financial data effective as of most recent fiscal year end or 12 month rolling data as was available.
The compensation committee periodically reviews and updates the list of companies comprising the peer group to ensure it provides an appropriate marketplace focus.
As discussed previously, on the basis of stockholder returns, FleetCor’s performance has also been outstanding in relation to our identified peer groups and the industry. The following graph assumes $100 invested on December 30, 2011, at the closing price of our common stock on that day ($29.87), and compares (a) the percentage change of our cumulative total stockholder return on the common stock (as measured by dividing (i) the difference between our share price at the end and the beginning of the period presented by (ii) the share price at the beginning of the periods presented) with (b) (i) the Russell 2000 index and (ii) the S&P 500® Data Processing & Outsourced Services index, (iii) our performance peer group and (iv) our industry peer group.

annualgraphcdapeea02.jpg

21






Period Ending FleetCor
Technologies, Inc.
 Russell 2000 S&P Data
Processing and
Outsourced
Services
 Performance Peer Group Average Industry Peer Group Average
12/31/2011 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00
12/31/2012 $175.56 $112.90 $127.24 $162.21 $114.27
12/31/2013 $383.41 $154.68 $193.11 $209.93 $171.69
12/31/2014 $486.62 $160.14 $216.56 $219.59 $190.65
12/31/2015 $467.70 $150.99 $239.38 $197.73 $205.12
12/31/2016 $463.09 $180.40 $253.40 $226.15 $215.08
Consideration of Peer Groups and Compensation Levels
Periodically, the compensation committee may determine it appropriate to engage a compensation consultant. The compensation committee engaged a compensation consultant in both 2013 and 2014, and determined the analysis provided by the compensation consultant was performed sufficiently recent for use in 2015 and 2016. The compensation committee will continue to engage a compensation consultant as it deems appropriate in future periods. During 2014, and for use with considering and setting compensation, the independent consultant collected and analyzed comprehensive market data for the compensation committee’s use. Mercer conducted a study of four distinct market references, three of which were scoped based on comparable market capitalization (performance group, industry group and general industry survey group scoped based on all companies in the general industry with market capitalization of $5 billion to $18 billion, or approximately 0.5x to 2x that of the Company) and the final group based on annual revenues.
The consultant presented to the compensation committee market figures based on each company in the performance-based and industry-based peer groups, as well as the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of each respective peer group, to determine market for base salary, target short-term incentive opportunity and long-term incentive opportunity. The compensation committee reviewed the data for each of the named executive officers for purposes of setting each of the elements of compensation and then made individual compensation decisions, taking into consideration such factors as performance, retention, internal equity, individual development, and succession planning, based upon each peer group. The compensation committee did not target any particular quartile or percentage in making compensation decisions.creating shareholder value. As a result, actual pay opportunities forwe regularly engage with our executives may be higher or lower thanshareholders throughout the median indicated by the peer groups.
The resultsyear in multiple forms — calls and in-person meetings with members of the management team, and shareholder conferences — to encourage ongoing, meaningful dialogue.

Forward-Leaning Compensation Practices

FLEETCOR has embraced best practices in our compensation consultant’s studies revealed two important findings:

programs, which strongly support our pay-for-performance philosophy and culture:

1.Higher performing companies do not offer higher target levels ofNEO compensation than average performing companies;aligned with Company and, as applicable, division performance
Base salary levels generally at or below peer median
Target annual cash incentives generally at or below peer median
Significant portion of NEO compensation generally delivered in the form of equity-based awards
Different performance metrics for different compensation components
Incentive payouts tied closely to achieving published guidance where applicable
Significant stock ownership requirements
No repricing or cashing out of underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights
No hedging or pledging of common shares
No excise tax gross-ups
No excessive perquisites
Maintain a compensation clawback policy
Double-trigger change of control provisions
Below-market severance coverage
Shareholder engagement includes governance committee Chair, additional Board members and management
Regular review of compensation programs
Utilize an independent compensation consultant


2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement29


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

We structure our executive compensation program to incorporate, on an ongoing basis, sound practices that are favored by shareholders, while avoiding practices that we do not believe are in shareholders’ best interests. The table below highlights the compensation practices we embrace and those that we do not follow:

Things We DoThings We Do Not Do
2.

   NEO incentive pay is tied to multiple financial performance conditions, and equity-based incentives are denominated in common shares

   Significant portion of NEO pay is tied to performance objectives that align with our business strategy

   Annual equity run rate and overhang are consistent with typical practices among similarly situated companies

   All change in control protections are “double-trigger”

   NEO incentives are tied to Company-wide initiatives and/or division objectives within such NEOs’ control

   Severance benefit levels for executives are well below general market practices

   We monitor and build risk-mitigation features into our compensation programs

The disparity between the Company’s market capitalization

X   Directors and revenues causes incongruence betweenexecutives are prohibited from hedging or pledging common shares

X   No repricing or cashing-out of underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights

X   No excise tax gross-ups

X   No current payment of dividends on unvested equity awards

X   No excessive perquisites

X   No “single trigger” change in control provisions

Components of Compensation and Target Direct Compensation Mix

The following table sets forth the key elements of our 2022 NEO compensation programs:

What We Pay

Why We Pay It

Key Features

Base Salary

Attract and retain high-performing executives by providing a secure and appropriate level of base pay levels

Established after consideration of peer practices and internal parity; reviewed annually and subject to adjustment

Annual Cash Incentive

Encourage and reward accomplishment of annual operating plan and individual objectives

Generally only earned if we meet performance goals tied to our operating budget and strategic initiatives

302023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

What We Pay

Why We Pay It

Key Features

Equity-Based Awards

Motivate performance and align a significant portion of NEO compensation with our ongoing success and with shareholder returns

    NEOs’ equity awards granted in that companies with market capitalizations similarPerformance Shares, performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance-Based RSUs”) and stock options

  Performance-based equity awards generally only have value to our NEOs to the Companyextent the pre-established corporate and/or business unit goals established by the compensation committee are achieved

 Stock options have higher targetvalue for our NEOs only if our stock price increases

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

Attract and retain executive talent

    Customary retirement and health and welfare benefits to all of our salaried employees, including our NEOs

   No nonqualified deferred compensation levels than companies with revenues similar to the Company.plans or defined benefit pension plans

     No excessive perquisites

Given the significance of this second finding and the need of the Company to retain top talent at all levels, including our CEO, and given the current market capitalization of the Company, the compensation committee has determined that the two peer groups are the most likely competitors for talent and as such represent the most appropriate reference when considering the compensation of executives. The compensation committee concludes that while revenue is a strong metric on which to gauge the Company’s performance, the Company consistently out-performs the general market of companies with similar revenues, and this may not be a useful metric on which to evaluate appropriate peers for compensation levels of the Company’s executives, especially the CEO.
The compensation consultant also concluded, based on their review of the compensation level of Company executives, that generally cash compensation is at or below market levels for all Company officers. Long-term incentive compensation is above market for certain officers, which causes their total direct compensation to be above market. It is important to note that the compensation consultant’s review was of one year of compensation and FleetCor has a history of front-loaded grants, which may result in inconsistent and less meaningful comparisons to other companies with typical annual grant cycles.
Furthermore, the long-term incentives only have value if the Company continues to grow and the employee performs, since performance awards require meaningful contributions by the employee and options only have value to the extent that the stock price increases from the date of grant. The risk in this case is carried by the employee, as the employee is only rewarded if the employee performs and/or the Company continues to perform.
We believe that this

Our mix of compensation better aligns the employeeelements is designed to reinforce business and strategic objectives, recognize and reward performance, motivate long-term value creation, and align our NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholdersshareholders. We generally achieve this through a combination of cash and helps ensure goals remain aligned to continueequity awards.

The Company is responsible for allocating capital in a manner that is in the significantbest interest of its shareholders in line with the stated objective of growing Adjusted EPS between 15%-20% per year over the mid-term. Some portion of this growth thatis contingent on effective capital allocation in the form of acquisitions and/or share buybacks as a use for our free cash flow.

As part of our existing stock repurchase program, the Company has experienced sinceregularly repurchased shares that it viewed as undervalued, and thus would provide a better return to shareholders

compared with other alternatives at the time. Also, repurchases are used to offset the dilutive effect of the issuance of shares to executives under equity compensation plans, including the exercise price of options, and the use of shares in acquisitions.

The Company aligns its executive compensation arrangements with its overall capital allocation strategy that maximizes shareholders’ interests, and share repurchases are accordingly not excluded from our initial public offering.


22






Determining Compensation for the Named Executive Officers
performance metrics. The compensation committee is responsible for administering our compensation practices and making decisions with respect to the compensation paid to our named executive officers. The compensation committee considers the recommendationskeenly aware of the Company’s stock repurchase approach under outstanding authorizations, and historical stock repurchases when setting performance metrics for executive compensation consultant. In addition, compensationawards. Because we intend to use free cash for our executive officers continues to be individualized, impacted by arm’s-length negotiations ateither repurchases or acquisitions, the time of employment, and thereafter based on a variety of factors, including:
our compensation committee’s evaluation of the competitive market based on its general market experience;
the roles and responsibilities of our executives, including the role’s impact to creating value for our stockholders;
the individual experience and skills of, and expected contributions from, our executives;
the individual performance of our executives during the year and the historic performance levels of our executives;
our overall financial performance;
our financial condition and available resources; and
our need for a particular position to be filled.
Our chief executive officer plays a significant role in reviewing the performance of the other executive officers and making compensation recommendations to the compensation committee for the executive officers who report directly to him, the Company’s performance relative to goals approved by the compensation committee, individual performance versus personal objectives and other individual contributions to the Company’s performance. Our chief executive officer annually evaluates the executive officers’ performance with the compensation committee and makes recommendations for base salary, cash incentive awards and grants of long-term equity incentive awards for all executive officers, other than himself. When discussing performance evaluations and setting compensation levels for our executive officers, the compensation committee works closely with our chief executive officer; however, the compensation committee has the discretion to reject or modify the recommendations of our chief executive officer. Our chief executive officerBoard does not participate as a director in determining or recommendingexclude repurchases from the amountfinal determination of his own compensation.performance achievement.



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement31

 

05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Target Mix of Compensation mix and how each element fits into our overall compensation objectives

The compensation committee strives to achieve an appropriate mix between fixed versus variable pay and cash payments and equity incentiveversus equity- based compensation awards in order to meet our compensation objectives. Our compensation committee does not have any formala rigid policy for allocating compensation between short-term andshort-and long-term compensation and cash and non-cash compensation. We believe the most important indicator of whether our compensation objectives are being met is our ability to motivate our executive officersNEOs to deliver superior performanceshareholder return and retain them to continue their careers with us on a cost-effective basis.

Our mix For NEOs other than the CEO, our compensation committee generally references cash-based components of compensation elementsbelow market levels and equity-based components of compensation (based on target levels) at market levels, resulting in total target compensation that is designed to reward recent results, motivate long-term performance and align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. We achieve this through a combination of cash and equity awards.
Base salary and benefits are designed to provide a secure level of cash compensation.
Annual cash incentive awards are designed to reward recent results. These awards support our annual operating plan and are earned only if we meetgenerally below the performance goals established by the compensation committee.
Discretionary bonuses are designed to reward for performance above and beyond our operating plan or to round payments to a specific award amount. These amounts may also be based on guaranteed payments at the time of offer and acceptance of employment for the first year of employment. These bonuses are awarded at the discretion of the compensation committee.
Equity awards are our chosen vehicle to motivate long-term performance and align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. Equity awards are granted in the form of stock options and performance-based restricted stock. Stock options have valuepeer median for our executives only ifNEOs other than the CEO. For our stock price increases. Some performance-based restricted stock has value to our executives only if the executive meets the executive’s individual performance goals established by the compensation committee. Other performance-based restricted stock has value to our executives only if the Company meets its performance metrics (e.g., earnings per share).
While we have typically provided cash compensation (base salary) and a cash incentive opportunity to each executive in each year, we have not historically provided equity compensation to each executive on an annual basis. We make equity grants designed to encourage specific performance goals or to reward an executive for extraordinary performance in a particular year and to encourage continued extraordinary performance. In determining the size of an equity awardCEO, the compensation committee considers relative job responsibility,references cash-based components below the value of existing unvested awards, individual performance history, prior contributions topeer median, and equity-based components above the Company,peer median, resulting in total compensation that is generally at or above the size of prior grants, arm’s-length negotiation atpeer median. Although the time of an executive’s hiring or refresh and availability of shares in our pool.
The compensation committee appliesincludes this market data and its general understanding of current compensation practices in the same compensation policies to all of our executive officers withmarket in the overall goal that themix of factors it considers in assessing NEO compensation, it does not target a mathematically precise market position for total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive and includes incentives that are designed to appropriately drive corporate performance. or any individual element of compensation.

The ultimate compensation levels earned byreflect the named executive officers reflect the


23






application of these policies to the varying roles and responsibilities of the executives. Generally,NEOs. In a typical year, it is expected that the greater the responsibility of the executive and the greater the potential impact of the executive on revenue and net income growth,the Company’s financial performance, the higher the potentialproportion of compensation that can be earned by the executive. In addition,executive in the compensation committee is awareform of the competitive market for executive compensation based upon market data provided by compensation consultants, which reflects a meaningful variation between the chief executive officer and other executive positions for each element ofperformance-based compensation.

Our chief executive officerCEO has the greatest responsibility in managing and driving the performance of our Company. He joined our companyCompany in 2000, and has managed our significant growth through a combination of organic initiatives, product and service innovation and over 70 acquisitions of businesses and commercial account portfolios, growingand has overseen the growth of our revenue from $33.0 million in 2000 to over $1.8approximately $3.4 billion in 2016.2022.

The charts below illustrate the 2022 total target direct compensation mix for our CEO and our continuing NEOs other than the CEO (on average), consisting of base salary, target annual cash incentives, and target equity-based incentives. As discussed in more detail below, in 2022 our CEO was not granted any equity compensation awards, because the 2021 CEO Performance Option was intended to serve as the long-term equity incentive portion of his total compensation for the period from 2020 through 2023. Therefore, the compensation mix for our CEO in the applicable chart below includes a resultquarter of ourthe total target value of the performance-based stock option award we granted to Mr. Clarke in 2021 (the “2021 CEO Performance Option”), even though such award was granted in 2021. The compensation committee’s assessment of our chief executive officer’s roleMessrs. Freund, Gavrilenya and responsibilities within ourCoughlin is not factored into the “Non-CEO NEOs” chart below because such individuals ceased serving in their officer positions during 2022.



322023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Equity Compensation in Prior Fiscal Years

As previously disclosed, we granted the 2021 CEO Performance Option to Mr. Clarke in September 2021. In connection with the grant of the 2021 CEO Performance Option, Mr. Clarke agreed not to receive any other long-term equity grants in 2021, 2022 or 2023.

The 2021 CEO Performance Option is intended to further align Mr. Clarke’s compensation interests with the Company his nearly 17 yearsstock price performance interests of the Company’s shareholders, and to help retain Mr. Clarke’s service to our Companyduring the period of time covered by the award. In considering and approving the competitive market for chief executive officer compensation, there is a significant compensation differential between his compensation levels and those of our other named executive officers.

Components of Compensation
Historically, we have not applied specific formulas to set compensation; however we have sought to benchmark our compensation programs against similarly situated companies. In 2014,award, the compensation committee engaged a compensation consultant to help benchmarkconsidered the best interests of the Company’s payment practices againstshareholders and a desire to retain Mr. Clarke due to, among other companiesconsiderations, his over 20-year history of operational excellence, development of a strong management team, and ability to lead the Company’s continued strategic development, transformation and expansion.

The 2021 CEO Performance Option covers 850,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $261.27 per share, which was the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. However, the option will vest only if we achieve specific stock price hurdles. Achievement of each stock price hurdle requires that our stock price exceed the hurdle for ten consecutive trading days not later than December 31, 2024 (in other words, only 3.25 years after the date of grant). The

stock price hurdle for 550,000 shares subject to the award is $350, and the stock price hurdle for the remainder of the award is $400.

The compensation committee considers achievement of each of the stock price hurdles to represent a significant challenge. The hurdles reflect stock price appreciation of 34% and 53%, respectively, from the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. As of April 17, 2023, the closing price per share of our common shares was $222.09, neither of the stock price hurdles for the 2021 CEO Performance Option had been met, and the 2021 CEO Performance Option was significantly “underwater.” However, notwithstanding these rigorous goals, due to the accounting standards that apply to stock option awards, the 2021 CEO Performance Option had significant “grant date fair value” (as determined pursuant to SEC rules) for purposes of the compensation tables included in last year’s proxy statement.

Mr. Clarke generally must continue to provide services to the Company over an 18-month vesting period to be eligible to vest in the full award (which vests over time in ratable installments every six months), regardless of our performance-basedstock price performance. Although the 2021 CEO Performance Option allows for vesting in the event of certain terminations of employment and industry-based peer groups,in connection with a change in control (on a “double trigger” basis), in all events the applicable stock price hurdles must be achieved in order for Mr. Clarke to vest in the award.

The table below outlines the performance metrics that were used in the CEO’s 2022 pay program, which metrics were selected to drive a focus on corporate objectives that are expected to produce an increase in shareholder value:

Pay Element

Performance Metric(s)

Rationale and Key Features

Annual Cash
Incentive

GAAP Revenue, as Adjusted (25% weight)

Revenue growth is critically important to our success given the operating leverage in our business

Adjusted EPS, as Adjusted (1) (25% weight)

Earnings per share performance aligns with shareholder objectives

M&A and Other Transactions (25% weight)

We expect M&A and other transactions to continue to contribute to growth
Growth and Other Initiatives (25% weight)Drive initiatives to improve financial results

(1) For purposes of the incentive compensation awards described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, “Adjusted EPS, as well asadjusted” is Adjusted EPS, further adjusted to exclude the general industry as a whole.impact of fuel prices, fuel price spreads, foreign exchange rates, acquisitions, and dispositions.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement33


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation

Base salary

Initial base salaries for our executive officers are typically negotiated at arm’s-length at the time of hiring. Salary

Base salaries are reviewed annually, and adjusted from time to time, taking into account individual responsibilities, individual performance, for the year, the experience of the individual, current salary, retention incentives, internal equity and the compensation committee’s evaluation of the competitive market, based on its general market experience.market. No particular weight is assigned to each factor.

these factors. Based on its consideration of these factors, the compensation committee approved increases to the base salary rates of Mr. Clarke and Mr. Netto for 2022. In setting Mr. Clarke’s base salary rate for 2022, the compensation committee specifically considered the need to properly incentivize Mr. Clarke. The table below illustrates the 2022 base salaries for our NEOs:



Named Executive Officer2021 Base Salary Rate2022 Base Salary Rate% Increase
Ronald F. Clarke$1,000,000$1,200,00020%
Alissa B. Vickery$225,000$250,00011.1%
Charles R. Freund$450,000$450,0000%
Armando L. Netto (1)$445,371$487,2729.4%
Alan King (1)$372,563$372,5630%
Alexey Gavrilenya$400,000$400,0000%
John S. Coughlin$450,000$450,0000%

(1) Mr. Netto’s cash compensation is denominated in Brazilian Real, and, at the time 2022 base salary determinations were made, Mr. King’s cash compensation was denominated in British Pounds Sterling. For purposes of this table and to normalize for fluctuations in the currency exchange rate, cash amounts for Mr. Netto have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average exchange rate of $1 to R$5.1535 for 2022, and cash amounts for Mr. King have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average exchange rate of $1 to £0.8080 for 2022. The 2021 base salary rate for Mr. Netto may not be comparable to the 2021 base salary rate reported for him in our 2022 proxy statement, as we used a 2021 exchange rate calculation for purposes of such disclosure in the prior filing.

Annual Salaries
Executive 2015 Salary 2016 Salary Increase
Ronald F. Clarke $1,000,000
 $1,000,000
 
Eric R. Dey(1) $344,231
 $373,077
 7%
John S. Coughlin(2) $372,116
 $398,077
 7%
Charles Freund(3) $315,384
 $343,077
 8%
Todd W. House(4) $372,116
 $398,077
 7%
___________
(1)Mr. Dey received a salary increase from $350,000 in 2015 to $375,000 in 2016, resulting in a 7% increase in his base salary.
(2)Mr. Coughlin received a salary increase from $375,000 in 2015 to $400,000 in 2016, resulting in a 7% increase in his base salary.
(3)Mr. Freund received a salary increase from $320,000 in 2015 to $345,000 in 2016, resulting in a 8% increase in his base salary.
(4)Mr. House received a salary increase from $375,000 in 2015 to $400,000 in 2016, resulting in a 7% increase in his base salary.

Annual cash incentive compensation

Cash Incentive

The primary objectives of our annual cash incentive compensation program are to provide an incentive for superior work, to motivate our employeesNEOs toward even higher achievement and business results and to tie our employees’NEOs’ goals to Company performancethe Company’s performance. We use Company-wide, individual and to enable us to attract and retain highly qualified individuals. The annual cash incentive program is intended to compensate our executive officers for achieving company-wide or individual or business unit performance goals that are important toin our success during the fiscal year. Certain goals, which tie directly to our operating budget, we believe, are attainable with good performance. Other goals, which we refer to as “stretch targets”, are considered far more difficult to achieve and in general require extraordinary performance to attain.

Our compensation committee approves all targets and payouts, in consultation with our chief executive officer. Executives are eligible for payments only if they are employed by us both on the last day of the applicable fiscal year and on the actual payment date of the incentive award, except as stipulated by employment agreements.
In January 2016, the compensation committee approved our 2016 annual cash incentive program for our executive officers employed at that time. The annual cash incentive program was intended to compensate our executives for the achievement of both our annual financial goals and individual or business unit performance objectives, as outlined below, and was structured to result in significant

24






compensation payouts only if performance goals were achieved. If performance goals are not achieved, the named executive officer may receive no payment under the program.
Our compensation committee set the target payout levels, generally as a percentage of base salary, for the executive officers based on recommendations from the chief executive officer (except with respect to his own level). The compensation committee determined these target payout levels based on a combination of factors, including each executive’s role and responsibilities, experience and skills, expected contribution to the Company and potential impact on revenue and net income growth.
Mr. Clarke’s target payout level was set at 100% of his base salary and he had the opportunity to earn an additional 88% of the bonus target based on stretch goals.
Mr. Dey’s target payout level was set at 50% of his base salary and he had the opportunity to earn an additional 30% of the bonus target based on stretch goals.
Mr. Coughlin's target payout level was set at 50% of his base salary and he had the opportunity to earn an additional 50% of the bonus target based on stretch goals.
Mr. Freund's target payout level was set at 50% of his base salary and he had the opportunity to earn an additional 40% of the bonus target based on stretch goals.
Mr. House's target payout level was set at 50% of his base salary and he had the opportunity to earn an additional 55% of the bonus target based on stretch goals.
2016 Performance goals and results. Our compensation committee structured the 2016 annual cash incentive program to include a combination of company-wide, business unit and individual performance goals, as appropriate, for the named executive officers. Individual or business unit performance goals are tied to the particular area of expertise and responsibilities of the executiveNEO and their performance in attaining those objectives.

Our named executive officers prepare recommendations regarding

In January 2022, the compensation committee determined the target annual cash incentive payout levels for the NEOs based on a combination of factors, including each NEO’s role and responsibilities, experience and skills, expected contribution to the Company and potential impact of the NEO’s performance on revenue and net income growth. Based on such factors, and after considering the need to properly incentivize Mr. Clarke, the compensation committee approved an increase of Mr. Clarke’s target annual cash incentive award from 100% of base salary to 150% of base salary. Due to the timing of Mr. Gavrilenya’s and Mr. Coughlin’s cessation of service in their individual or business unitprior officer roles, they were not eligible for 2022 annual cash incentive awards. Target amounts below are shown as a percent of each participating NEO’s base salary:

Named Executive OfficerAnnual Cash Incentive Target (as % of Base Salary)
Ronald F. Clarke150%
Alissa B. Vickery30%
Charles R. Freund75%
Armando L. Netto75%
Alan King75%

342023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2022 Performance Goals and Results

The compensation committee and the CEO work together to establish meaningful performance goals whichfor the CEO’s annual cash incentive award at the beginning of the performance period. These goals are reviewed by our chief executive officer and approved byintended to align CEO rewards with company performance. Based on achievement of the compensation committee. Certainapplicable performance goals, couldthe CEO’s annual cash incentive was designed to be paid out in amounts up to 200% of target.

Our CEO makes recommendations regarding individual and/or business unit performance goals, which are reviewed and approved by the individual targetcompensation committee, for our other NEOs.

Based on achievement of the applicable performance goals, all other NEOs’ annual cash incentives were designed to be paid out in amounts for performance exceeding objectives. Other goalsranging up to 150%.

Annual cash incentive awards could be paid out in amounts as low as 50% ofbelow the individual target amounts if actual performance achieved minimum thresholds.

Certain The awards were designed so that performance below threshold would result in no payout for a given goal.

The tables below illustrate, for each participating NEO, (1) the performance goals are based on achieving an earnings per share target based on adjusted net income. Adjusted net income is GAAP net income as reflected in our statement of income, adjusted to eliminate (a) non-cash stock based compensation expense related share-based compensation awards, (b) amortization of deferred financing costs and intangible assets (c) amortization of the premium recognized on the purchase of receivables, (d) our proportionate share of amortization of intangible assets at our equity method investment and (e) impairment of our equity method investment. The reconciliation of adjusted net income per diluted share to our GAAP numbers is provided on page 71 of our Form 10-Kapproved for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and in Appendix A2022 annual incentive awards, (2) actual performance with respect to the proxy statement.goals (where applicable), and (3) the final 2022 annual cash incentive payout earned by the NEO (if any).

Ronald F. Clarke: Mr. Clarke’s award2022 annual cash incentive was determined as follows:

   GOALS2022 

Performance
Metric

Weighting 

Target

($ values in
millions)

Threshold
(50%) 

Below
Target
(75%)

Target
(100%)

Above
Target
(150%)

Maximum (200%)

Achievement
($ values in
millions, except
Adj. EPS)

% of Target
Earned

GAAP

Revenue, as adjusted(1)

25%

$3,220

≥98%

≥99%

≥100%

≥101%

≥102% 

$3,331.4

200%

Adjusted EPS, as adjusted

25%

Budget 

≥98% 

≥99%

≥100%

≥101%

≥102%

102%

200%

M&A (2)

25%

$750

Pays at 0.06% of total transaction value, up to a maximum payout of $900,000

$474.2

67%

Growth and Other Initiatives(3)

25%

Achieve 2 goalsAchieve 1 goal

N/A

Achieve 2 goalsAchieve 3 goals

Achieve

4 or more goals

Achieved 3 goals

150%

Target Payout$1,800,000
(i)Total Payout % Earned50% of his target award, or $500,000, could be earned if we achieved a 2016 adjusted net income per diluted share “EPS” of $6.55, with the ability to receive 50%, 150% and 200% of the potential payout with results within a specified range above or below this target. The Company achieved adjusted net income per diluted share “EPS” of $6.92 for the year ended December 31, 2016, exceeding the target performance and Mr. Clarke attained 200%, or $1,000,000, of this award.
154%
(ii)Total Payout25% of his target award, or $250,000, could be earned if we achieved growth targets through acquisitions or divestment of prescribed businesses, with the ability to receive 150% and 200% of potential payout for exceeding the target within a specified range. Mr. Clarke attained 100% of this award with the acquisition of the STP business in 2016.$2,776,500

(1) Adjusted to be consistent with the macro-economic environment assumed in the 2022 budget, but excludes the impact of acquisitions.

(2) Based upon the aggregate transaction value of material mergers and acquisitions, divestitures or joint ventures for which the Company signs definitive documentation during the year.

(3) (a) Capture synergies from certain acquisitions (achieved); (b) Achieve global sales growth of specified amount (achieved); (c) Design, recruit and successfully test a new platform salesforce (not achieved); (d) Extend at least two big partner contracts (achieved); (e) Add 3 new large investors in 2022 (not achieved) and (f) Substantial growth of Sem Parar consumer fueling transactions (not achieved).

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement35

(iii)25% of his target award, or $250,000, could be earned if we achieved growth targets through contractual relationships, new partner deals or acquisitions with the ability to receive 150% of potential payout for exceeding the target. Mr. Clarke attained 150% of his award, or $375,000, with the signing of the Speedway partner relationship agreement in the U.S., the successful acquisition of two tuck-in acquisitions in 2016 and renewed contractual relationships, exceeding the target performance.
Mr. Dey’s award

05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Alissa B. Vickery: Ms. Vickery’s 2022 annual cash incentive was determined as follows:

   GOALS  

Performance
Metric

Weighting

Target

Threshold
(50%)

Target
(100%)

Maximum
(150%) 

2022 

Achievement

% of Target Earned

Growth Initiatives (1)100%Achieve 3 goalsAchieve 2 goalsAchieve 3 goalsAchieve 4 or more goalsAchieved 4 goals125%

Target Payout$75,000
Total Payout % Earned125%
Formulaic Payout$93,750
Discretionary Amount(2)$56,250
Total Payout$150,000

(1) (a) Fill open staff positions (achieved), (b) resolution of certain accounting matters (not achieved), (c) implement certain software package (achieved), (d) remediate certain audit recommendations (achieved), and (e) prepare operational contingency plan (achieved).

(2) Reflects a discretionary increase in recognition of Ms. Vickery’s individual contributions during 2022, including as Interim Chief Financial Officer.

Charles R. Freund: Mr. Freund’s 2022 annual cash incentive was designed to be paid in accordance with the objectives set forth in the table below. However, due to Mr. Freund’s resignation from FLEETCOR, he was not eligible to receive any payout with respect to his 2022 annual cash incentive award, and the achievement results with respect to his performance objectives were not evaluated by the compensation committee.

GOALS

Performance Metric

Weighting

Threshold (50%)

Target (100%)

Maximum (150%)

Stock Price Growth
vs. S&P 500 (1)

30%

≥2.5%≥5.0%≥7.5%
Growth Initiatives(2)70%Achieve 1 goalAchieve 2 goalsAchieve 3 or more goals

(i)30% of his target award, or $56,250, could be earned if we successfully modified our Credit Facility to facilitate acquisitions as prescribed, modified our Securitization Facility as prescribed or modified certain aspects of our Credit Facility requirements as prescribed, with the ability to receive 50%, 100% and 150% of the potential payout with completion of each incremental project. As the Company completed two of the three targets during 2016, Mr. Dey attained 100%, or $56,250, of this award.Target Payout:$337,500

(1) Based on extent to which percentage growth in the Company’s stock price exceeds that of the S&P 500 Index.

(2) (a) Achieve the operating expenses and capital expenditure budget, (b) new holders of company stock, (c) fill certain open roles, (d) negotiate certain new credit facilities, and (e) resolution of certain legal matters.

362023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

(ii)30% of his target award, or $56,250, could be earned if he successfully implemented the new designated general ledger system in 2016, with the ability to receive 150% of the potential payout with successful execution at 267% of the prescribed number

25







of lines of business and markets at the target level.

05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Armando L. Netto:Mr. Dey attained 50% of his award, or $28,125, with the implementation of the new general ledger system in two European lines of business and remaining Shell markets in which the Company operates.

(iii)30% of his target award, or $56,250, could be earned for the successful recruitment of new investors, at prescribed levels in 2016. Mr. Dey attained 100% of the award, or $56,250.
(iv)10% of his target award, or $18,750, could be earned for the successful recruitment of a new specified finance position. Mr. Dey attained 100% of the award, or $18,750.
Mr. Coughlin’s awardNetto’s 2022 annual cash incentive was determined as follows:
follows (with all currency converted from BRL to USD using an average exchange rate of $1 to R$5.1535 for 2022):

 

Performance
Metric 

 

Weighing 

 

Target 

 

Threshold
(50%) 

 

Below
Target
(70%) 

 

Below
Target
(85%) 

 

Target
(100%) 

 

Above
Target
(120%) 

Below
Maximum
(135%) 

Maximum
(150%) 

2022

Achievement

% of Target
Earned

Brazil Sales (1)

60%

Budget

≥91%

≥93%

≥99%

≥100%

≥103%

≥106%

≥109%

96%

70%

Growth Initiatives (2)

40%

Achieve 2 goals

Achieve 1 goal

N/AN/A

Achieve 2 goals

N/AN/A

Achieve 3 goals

Achieved 1 goal50%

Target Payout$365,455
(i)Total Payout % Earned100% of his target award, or $200,000, could be earned if we achieved growth targets through acquisitions of businesses, with the ability to receive 150% of potential payout for exceeding the target within a specified range. Mr. Coughlin attained 150% of this award, or $300,000, with the acquisition of the STP, TravelCard and several smaller businesses in 2016.62%
Formulaic Payout$226,582
Discretionary Amount(3)$64,482
Total Payout$291,064

(1) Targets are also subject to sales expense remaining in budget.

(2) (a) Add specified target of incremental fueling sites (achieved) and Increase Sem Parar consumer transactions by specified target (not acheived); (b) Achieve target Caixa revenue (not achieved); and (c) Move to ifood network (achieved).

(3) Reflects a discretionary increase in recognition of the year-over-year growth in our Brazil business.

Alan King: Mr. Freund’s awardKing’s 2022 annual cash incentive was determined as follows:

Performance
Metric

Weighing

Target

Threshold
(50%)

Below
Target
(70%)

Below
Target
(85%)

Target
(100%)

Above
Target
(120%)

Below
Maximum
(135%)

Maximum
(150%)

2022

Achievement

% of Target
Earned

 

Fuel Sales(1) 

60% 

Budget

≥91%

≥93%

≥99%

≥100%

≥103%

≥106%

≥109%

106%

135%

Growth Initiatives (2)

40%

Achieve 2 goals

Achieve 1 goal

N/A

N/A

Achieve 2 goals

N/A

N/A

Achieve 3 or more goals

Achieved 4 goals

150%

Target Payout$279,422(3)
(i)Total Payout % Earned50% of his target award, or $86,250, could be earned if we achieved certain sales targets as prescribed, with the ability to receive 50%, 100% and 150% of the potential payout with achievement of the target within a specified range. Mr. Freund attained 50% of this award, or $43,125.
141%
(ii)Total Payout30% of his target award, or $51,750, could be earned if we achieved certain sales profitability targets as prescribed, with the ability to receive 50%, 100% and 150% of the potential payout with achievement of the target within a specified range. Mr. Freund did not attain this award.$393,986
(iii)20% of his target award, or $34,500, could be earned for the achievement of certain sales outsourcing initiatives. Mr. Freund did not attain this award.

(1) Targets are also subject to sales expense remaining in budget.

(2) (a) Achieve EV goal of greater than 20 live active EV clients within revenue requirements (achieved); (b) design, agree and staff global fleet organization (achieved);

(c)  complete a particular acquisition (achieved); (d) re-sign specified partners by year-end (achieved).

(3) Mr. House's award was determined as follows:

(i)40% of his target award, or $80,000, could be earned if we achieved certain growth targets in businesses he directly manages, with the ability to receive 50%, 100% and 150% of the potential payout with results within a specified range above or below his target. Mr. House attained 50% of his award, or $40,000.
(ii)30% of his target award, or $60,000, could be earned if we successfully achieved certain sales targets in specified products he direct manages, with the ability to receive 50%, 100% and 150% of the potential payout within a specified range above or below his target. Mr. House did not attain this award.
(iii)30% of his target award, or $60,000, could be earned for the achievement of certain specified growth initiatives in businesses he directly manages, weighted equally with a maximum achievement of 167% of the target. Mr. House attained 67% of his award, or $40,000, with the signing of Speedway services agreement and implementation of new functionality for customers in GFN in the U.S.
The annual incentive award amounts earned by each named executive officer under our cash incentive program are included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table for 2016.
2016 Discretionary bonuses and guaranteed bonus. The compensation committee awarded additional discretionary bonuses to certain of our named executive officers for 2016 for strong performance outside of predetermined performance targets, as follows:
Mr. Freund was awarded a discretionary bonus of $56,875.
Mr. House was awarded a discretionary bonus of $70,000.
The discretionary bonus amounts for 2016 are included in the Bonus column in the Summary Compensation Table.
2017 Annual cash incentive program. The compensation committee has approved a 2017King’s annual cash incentive program thataward is materially consistent with our 2016 program. Each executive officer willdenominated in British Pound Sterling. For purposes of this table and to normalize for fluctuations in the currency exchange rate, cash amounts for Mr. King have the opportunitybeen converted to earn a target award based on Company-wide targets and/or individual targets. In February 2017, the compensation committee approved the 2017 annual cash incentive program based upon the recommendationsU.S. dollars at an average exchange rate of our chief executive officer.$1 to £0.8080 for 2022.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement37

Long-term equity incentive awards

05.COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The goal of our long-term, equity-based incentive awards is to motivate long-term performance and align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Most of our equity awards require achievement of performance goals for the awards to vest. For other awards, because vesting is based on continued employment, our equity-based incentives also encourage the retention of our executive officers through the vesting period of the awards.

Equity Awards

We believe that stock options are an effective tool for meeting our compensation goals because executives are able to profit from stock options only if our stock price increases relative to the stock


26






option’s exercise price. In addition, we believe that performance-based restricted stock and stockequity awards are effective tools for meeting our compensation goals because the conditions to vesting motivate the achievement of performance goals and the value of the grants will increase as the value of our stock price increases.
We have not historically provided equity awards (in the form ofbelieve that stock options or performance-based restricted stock) to our executives onare also an annual basis. The compensation committee has established an annual program to award performance-based restricted stock to executive officers based on Company-wide performance (e.g. EPS), which was again renewedeffective tool for 2017.
We typically use equity awards to compensate our executives in the form of (1) initial grants in connection with the commencement of employment and additional “refresher” grants when an executive has vested in his or her existing grants and (2) grants designed to encourage specific performance goals. To date there has been no set program for the award of refresher grants, andmeeting our compensation committee retains discretion to make equity awards at any time, including in connection with the promotion of an executive, to reward an executive, for retention purposes or for other circumstances. Our compensation committee has established a pool of shares available for equity awards. All awardsgoals because NEOs are subjectrewarded only if our stock price increases relative to the availability of shares from this pool.
In determiningstock option’s exercise price. To determine the size of each NEO’s equity awards, we consider the long-term equity incentives to be awarded to our executives, we take into account a number of internal factors, such as the relative job scope, the value of existing long-term incentive awards,external market, individual performance history prior contributions to the Company, the size of prior grants, arm’s-length negotiation at the time of an executive’s hiring and availability of shares in our pool. relative job responsibilities.

Our chief executive officerCEO makes equity award grant recommendations for each executive officer, including our named executive officersNEOs (other than himself). Grant recommendations are presented to the compensation committee for its review and approval.

Prior to our initial public offering, we granted options and performance-based restricted stock to our employees, including executive officers, under

2021 Performance Stock Option Award for CEO

In September 2021, as discussed above, the FleetCor Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, which we refer to as our “2002 Plan.” Since our initial public offering, we have granted time-based stock options, performance-based stock options, time-based restricted stock, market-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock to our employees, including our executive officers, under the FleetCor Technologies, Inc. 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, which we refer to as our “2010 Plan.”

The compensation committee may, atapproved the 2021 CEO Performance Option for Mr. Clarke. Mr. Clarke did not receive any time and from time to time, amend, modify or terminate any outstanding award. Award modifications may be madeequity compensation awards in order to realign the performance objectives of the award with the current goals of the company and role of the participant in the Company. Award modifications are revalued at the date of modification in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.2022.

2016

Other NEOs’ 2022 Equity awards. During 2016,Awards

In January 2022, we granted the following equityequity-based incentive awards set forth in the table below to our NEOs other than the CEO:

Named
Executive
Officer 

Performance
Shares
(Target 

$ Value) 

Total
Performance
Shares (#) 

Performance-
Based RSUs
(Target $
Value) 

Total Target
Performance-
Based RSUs (#) 

Stock
Options
(Target $
Value) 

Stock
Options
(#) 

Special
Retention Stock

Options
(Target $
Value)

Special
Retention
Stock
Options (#)

Alissa B. Vickery$250,0001,109$300,0004,588
Charles R. Freund$335,0001,486$1,200,0005,323$1,200,00018,352$1,200,00018,352
Armando L. Netto$335,0001,486$1,200,0005,323$1,200,00018,352$1,200,00018,352
Alan King$335,0001,486$1,200,0005,323$1,200,00018,352$1,200,00018,352
Alexey Gavrilenya$335,0001,486$1,200,0005,323$1,200,00018,352$1,200,00018,352
John S. Coughlin$335,0001,486$1,200,0005,323$1,200,00018,352$1,200,00018,352

Performance Share Grants

The NEOs, other than Mr. Clarke, received 2022 Performance Share awards tied to Adjusted EPS, as adjusted, achievement. The Performance Shares could be earned if we achieved budgeted Adjusted EPS, as adjusted. Our Adjusted EPS for 2022 was $16.10, and the compensation committee determined that the Adjusted EPS, as adjusted, objective was achieved. As a result, the 2022 Performance Share awards were earned at 100%, and were paid in full in the form of common shares, except that Ms. Vickery’s earned Performance Shares are subject to service-based vesting over a two-year period.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) Grants

In addition to the Performance Shares, in 2022, we granted Performance-Based RSU awards to our named executive officers (excluding award modifications):each of the NEOs other than Mr. Clarke and Ms. Vickery tied to achievement with

NamePerformance-based restricted stock Time-based stock options
Ronald F. Clarke50,000 425,000
Eric R. Dey1,460 44,000
John S. Coughlin1,460 64,250
Charles Freund1,460 44,000
Todd W. House1,460 44,000
Performance-based restricted stock grants. Certain of our performance-based restricted stock grants contain individual

respect to corporate or business unit revenue goals. The Performance-Based RSUs earned by each of the NEOs in 2022 (based on the achievement of the applicable performance conditions. Such shares typically dogoals) are subject to a three-year ratable vesting schedule, pursuant to which the earned Performance-Based RSUs will generally vest in substantially equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

The tables below illustrate, for each participating NEO, (1) the applicable performance goals for each NEO, (2) actual performance with respect to the performance metrics, and (3) the number of Performance-Based RSUs earned in 2022 that are eligible to vest on a ratable basis. The number of Performance-Based RSUs earned for performance falling between the “threshold” and “maximum” performance levels set forth in the table below was determined without interpolation between performance levels (subject to rounding). Because Ms. Vickery’s compensation for 2022 was established prior to her appointment as our interim Chief Financial Officer, she was not vest until these performance conditions have been satisfied. For 2016, approximately 80%eligible for a Performance-Based RSU award.


382023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Charles R. Freund: Mr. Freund’s 2022 Performance-Based RSU award was based on achievement against a target goal of stretch targets related to performance-based restricted stock grants were attained. The earning of these performance based restricted stock awards is indicativeCompany revenue (as adjusted). Because Mr. Freund ceased employment with the Company before the end of the performance of the Company during the same period.

We also provide performance-based restricted stock grants based on Company-wide performance conditions. The compensation committee approved an annual program for granting of performance-based restricted stock grants based on the Company achieving adjusted earnings per share “EPS” targets. This program awarded each executive officer annual grants tiedperiod, he was not eligible to Company-wide goalsreceive a payout with respect to this award, and helps align their interests and compensation with those of our stockholders. We refer to these awards as EPS grants. The Company has historically attained its performance goals and thus these EPS grants have historically vested at 100%. The EPS grants award program was reviewed in 2016 and approved by the compensation committee for continuance in 2017.
Performance-based stock option grants. We also may provide performance-based stock option grantsdid not evaluate performance against the goals.

Below
Threshold (0%)

 

Threshold
(50%)

 

Above
Threshold
(75%)

 

Below Target
(85%)

 

Target
(100%)

 

Above Target
(115%)

 

Below Maximum (125%)

 

Maximum (150%)

 

<97%97%98%99%100%101%102%≥103%

Armando L. Netto :Mr. Netto’s 2022 Performance-Based RSU award was based on Company-wideachievement against a target goal of net revenue, as adjusted, in the Brazil business.(1)

Below
Threshold
(0%)

 

Threshold
(50%)

 

Above
Threshold
(75%)

 

Below
Target
(85%)

 

Target
(100%)

 

Above
Target
(115%)

 

Below
Maximum
(125%)

 

Maximum
(150%)

 

% of Target
Achieved

 

Payout %

 

# of
Performance
Based RSUs
Earned
<97%97%98%99%100%101%102%≥103%103%150%7,985

(1) Brazil net revenue was adjusted to be consistent with the macro-economic environment assumed in the 2022 budget, but excludes the impact of foreign exchange rates.

Alan King:Mr. King’s 2022 Performance-Based RSU award was based on achievement against a target goal of net revenue, as adjusted, in the International Fuel business.(1)

Below
Threshold (0%)

 

Threshold
(50%)

 

Above
Threshold
(75%)

 

Below
Target
(85%)

 

Target
(100%)

 

Above
Target
(115%)

 

Below
Maximum
(125%)

 

Maximum
(150%)

 

% of
Target
Achieved

 

Payout %

 

# of Performance
Based RSUs
Earned

 

<97%97%98%99%100%101%102%≥103%104%150%7,985

(1) International Fuel net revenue was adjusted to be consistent with the macro-economic environment assumed in the 2022 budget, but excludes the impact of foreign exchange rates, fuel prices and fuel price spreads.

Alexey Gavrilenya:Mr. Gavrilenya’s 2022 Performance-Based RSU award was based on achievement against a target goal of net revenue (as adjusted) in the North American Fuel business. Because Mr. Gavrilenya ceased employment with the Company before the end of the performance conditions. These awards are typically designed as stretchperiod, he was not eligible to receive a payout with respect to this award, and the compensation committee did not evaluate performance against the goals.

Below
Threshold
(0%)

 

Threshold
(50%)

 

Above
Threshold
(75%)

 

Below
Target
(85%)

 

Target
(100%)

 

Above
Target
(115%)

 

Below
Maximum
(125%)

 

Maximum
(150%)

 

<97%97%98%99%100%101%102%≥103%

John Coughlin :Mr. Coughlin’s 2022 Performance-Based RSU award was based on achievement against a target awards atgoal of net revenue (as adjusted) in the timeCorporate Payments business. Because Mr. Coughlin ceased employment with the Company before the end of grant. the performance period, he was not eligible to receive a payout with respect to this award, and the compensation committee did not evaluate performance against the goals.

Below
Threshold
(0%)

 

Threshold
(50%)

 

Above
Threshold
(75%)

 

Below
Target
(85%)

 

Target
(100%)

 

Above
Target
(115%)

 

Below
Maximum
(125%)

 

Maximum
(150%)

 

<97%97%98%99%100%101%102%≥103%

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement39


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Stock Option Grants

The exercise price of each stock option grant is the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date (closing stock price) and typically vests over a


27






period of three years and are attainable only with continued employment through the vesting period, as well as successful achievement of the related performance criteria.
Time-based stock option grants. The exercise price of each stock option grant is the fair market value of our common stockshares on the grant date (closing stock price). Stock option awards granted to our named executive officers typicallyNEOs, other than Mr. Clarke, in 2022 generally vest ratably over a period of two to four years and are attainableearned only with continued employment through the vesting period. We believe our vesting schedules generally encouragestock option awards are inherently performance-based, requiring stock price appreciation before there is any real value earned, while encouraging long-term employment with the Company while allowingCompany. At the time we made our executivesregular grants of stock options to realize compensation only when they createour NEOs (other than Mr. Clarke), we also made special, additional stock option grants to such NEOs as an additional retention incentive (other than Ms. Vickery, who commenced service as our interim Chief Financial Officer after 2022 equity awards were granted). In January 2022, we granted the stock options set forth below to our NEOs other than the CEO:

Named Executive Officer# of Options# of Special Retention Stock OptionsTotal # of Options
Alissa B. Vickery4,588--4,588
Charles R. Freund18,35218,35236,704
Armando L. Netto18,35218,35236,704
Alan King18,35218,35236,704
Alexey Gavrilenya18,35218,35236,704
John S. Coughlin18,35218,35236,704

Prior-Year Equity Awards

In 2020, Mr. Netto was granted a retention equity award in the form of 35,000 performance-based stock options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value forof our stockholders.

2016 changecommon shares on the grant date (closing stock price). This award contemplated that vesting of the award would be subject to neutral macro-economic environment methodology.the achievement of performance goals. In 2016,April 2021, the compensation committee conducted an assessmentestablished the performance goals for the option award, which were based on achievement with respect to new active urban plan users (weighted at 75%) and consumer fueling transactions (weighted at 25%). The performance period for this award ended in the first quarter of 2023. The table below sets forth the goals, achievement levels and actual stock options earned under the award:

       
  PERFORMANCE LEVEL  

 

Goal 

 

Weighting 

 

Threshold
(50% earned) 

 

Target 

(100% earned)

 

 

 Maximum
(150% earned)

 

Achievement
(as % of
Target) 

# of Stock
Options
Earned 

 

Active Urban Plan Users (1)75%N/AAchieve 750,000 active Urban Plan Users by the first quarter of 2023N/A103%26,250
Consumer Fueling Transactions (dollars in millions)25%$2.25$3.0$3.7580%4,375

(1) For purposes of this award, “Active Urban Plan Users” is the number of users of our Brazil toll product that are urban. If the “Target” level for this metric was achieved, then 100% of the impactportion of the macro-economic environment onoptions subject to this metric would vest. No options would be earned for this metric if performance was below the evaluation“Target” level, and the earned portion of executivethe options would not increase for performance above the “Target” level.

402023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Omission of Certain Goal Levels

We believe that disclosure of certain goal levels for our NEOs’ annual cash incentive and equity goal achievement. After several years of relatively steady diesel prices and foreign exchange rates, recent volatility in macro-economic factors made it difficult to measure executive performance in 2015 and 2016 in a manner consistent withawards described above would cause us competitive harm. However, we have provided information regarding the Company’s historic practices. As shown in the graphs below, diesel fuel prices remained relatively steady in 2012 through 2014 but took a sharp turn downward in 2015 and 2016. Similarly, exchange rates were relatively steady in 2012 through 2014 but also took an unfavorable turn in 2015 and 2016. As a result, the compensation committee shifted its methodology in 2016 to evaluate equity target achievementpayout levels that would be applied based on a steady macro-economic environment - i.e., holding fuel prices and foreign exchange rates steady to be consistent with 2014. This resulted in a modification to some awards in accordance with accounting guidance in ASC 718.

dieselgraph512017.jpgfxgraph512017.jpg
U.S. Diesel Retail Prices (source: U.S. Energy Information Administration)Euro v. USD Exchange Rates (source: Forex)
2016 Equity Awards—Chief Executive Officer
The compensation committee independently considered Mr. Clarke’s long-term equity incentive compensation in 2016, includingpercentage achievement against the analysis and recommendations oftarget levels for such goals. In setting the compensation consultant from prior years. The compensation committee considered the history of grants to Mr. Clarke, the rationale for the grants and the relative vesting/performance criteria established for those grants, the historical performance of the Company, as well as anticipated future performance of the Company when determining appropriate grants in 2016.
Performance-based restricted stock grant: During 2016, the compensation committee approved a grant to Mr. Clarke of 50,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock, which required the Company to achieve 2016 adjusted net income per diluted share “EPS” of $6.50. As the Company achieved EPS of $6.92, these shares vested in February 2017. Additionally, as noted above the compensation committee conducted an assessment in 2016 of the volatility of the macro-economic environment and the impact on the ability to evaluate executive performance and equityapplicable target achievement consistent with the Company’s past practices, and implemented a neutral macro-economic methodology. This change to a neutral macro-economic methodology was applied uniformly to employee stretch targets for all employees with stretch target equity goals, and resulted in the modification of and recognition of some awards in accordance with accounting guidance in ASC 718, including the vesting of a 2014 grant to Mr. Clarke of 50,000 performance-based restricted shares.

28






Time-based stock option grant: During 2016, the compensation committee approved a grant to Mr. Clarke of 425,000 time-based stock options, which will vest at 50% on each of January 20, 2017 and 2018.
2016 Equity Awards—Other Named Executive Officers
Performance-based restricted stock grant: The compensation committee granted Messrs. Dey, Coughlin, Freund and House 1,460 shares of performance-based restricted stock in 2016, which required the company to achieve 2016 adjusted net income per diluted share “EPS” of $6.50. As the Company achieved EPS of $6.92, these shares vested in February 2017.
Time-based stock option grant: As certain of our executives had limited remaining unvested awards with a strike price in excess of the Company's stock price,levels, the compensation committee considered the need for a new long-term grants in order to ensure the continued long-term engagement and employment of these executives.
During 2016, the compensation committee approved a grant to Messrs. Dey, Freund and House of 44,000 time-based stock options, which will vest 50% on each of January 20, 2017 and 2018. Additionally, during 2016, the compensation committee approved a grant to Mr. Coughlin of 64,250 time-based stock options, which will vest 50% on each of January 20, 2017 and 2018.
Mr. Coughlin- Additional Grants
Performance-based restricted stock grant: As noted above, the compensation committee conducted an assessment in 2016how achievement of the volatility ofperformance goals could be impacted by events expected to occur in the macro-economic environmentcoming years, and how likely it would be for the impactgoals to be achieved. We believe that the below-target goals (where applicable) have been established at levels that should be appropriately difficult to attain, and that the target goals require considerable effort on the abilitypart of each NEO to evaluate executive performanceachieve. Achievement of above-target goals (where applicable) is considered to be a “stretch” target given market conditions.

Other Compensation and equity target achievement consistent with the Company’s past practices, and implemented a neutral macro-economic methodology. This change to a neutral macro-economic methodology was applied uniformly to employee stretch targets for allBenefits

Employee Benefits. All U.S.-based salaried employees with stretch target equity goals, and resulted in the modification of and recognition of some awards in accordance with accounting guidance in ASC 718, including the vesting of a 2014 grant to Mr. Coughlin of 3,313 performance-based restricted shares.

Mr. House- Additional Grants
Performance-based restricted stock grant: As noted above, the compensation committee conducted an assessment in 2016 of the volatility of the macro-economic environment and the impact on the ability to evaluate executive performance and equity target achievement consistent with the Company’s past practices, and implemented a neutral macro-economic methodology. This change to a neutral macro-economic methodology was applied uniformly to employee stretch targets for all employees with stretch target equity goals, and resulted in the modification of and recognition of some awards in accordance with accounting guidance in ASC 718, including the vesting of three 2014 grants to Mr. House of 3,000, 3,000 and 6,000 performance-based restricted shares, respectively, related to his performance in delivering specified revenue results in businesses he directly managed in 2015 and 2016.
Benefits and perquisites
We offer all U.S.-based employees the opportunity toNEOs may participate in a 401(k) plan. The general purpose of our 401(k) plan is to provide employees with an incentive to make regular savings contributions in order to provide additional financial security during retirement. Our 401(k) plan provides that we match 25% of an employee’s contribution, up to an employee contribution of 4% of salary. Our named executive officersNEOs in the U.S. may participate in this 401(k) plan on the same basis as all of our other participating employees.
Consistent with local employment practices, our senior executives in Brazil, including Mr. Netto, receive a car allowance on a monthly basis to assist with the cost of transportation. We provide health benefits to all of our eligible employees including our named executive officers, health benefits and we pay the premiums for these benefits on behalf of our named executive officers.NEOs. We provide to our named executive officersNEOs life insurance benefits, long-termlong term care insurance and concierge doctor services and also pay the premiums on their behalf.
these premiums. We do not provide any nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements or defined benefit pension plans to our named executive officers.
NEOs.

Employment Agreements and Offer Letters; Severance and ChangeChange-in-Control Benefits. We entered into an employment agreement with our CEO in 2010. We have also entered into offer letter agreements with each of Control Benefits

Underour other NEOs other than Ms. Vickery. Mr. Clarke’s and the other applicable NEOs’ (except for Mr. Freund’s) agreements provide that in the case of their employment agreements or offer letters, and pursuant to our historic practice, our executive officers are generallytermination under specific circumstances, they will be entitled to certain severance and change of control benefits.
If we terminate Mr. Clarke’s employment for any reason other than for cause, Mr. Clarke will receive cash severance payments,payments. These agreements are discussed below in equal monthly installments over 12 months, equal to 150% of his then-current annual base salary plus any accrued and unpaid vacation. Mr. Clarke will also receive payment of his health insurance premiums“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in amounts equal to those made immediately prior to his termination and, if permissible, continuation of coverage under our life and disability insurance plans for 12 months. In addition, if within 12 months following a change in control Mr. Clarke’s employment is terminated by him for good reason or is terminated by the Company for any reason other than cause, Mr. Clarke can elect to have us purchase from him any

29






remaining equity in the Company that he held at January 1, 2010 and still holds. At December 31, 2016, this included 750,000 options to purchase the Company's common stock. The purchase price would be at the fair market value. In addition to Mr. Clarke’s rights under his employment agreement, he also has all rights and conditions as to stock and stock options granted to him under our 2010 Plan as set forth below.
Each of our other executive officers will receive cash severance in the amount of six months of their then-current salary, upon execution of a general release, if they are terminated by us for any reason other than for cause.Control.” We provide severance compensation if our executivescertain NEOs are terminated without cause to attract and retain qualified executive talent, and, with respect to post-change in control benefits, to incentivize our executive officerssuch NEOs to act in the best interests of our stockholdersshareholders in the face of a transaction even if they may be terminated as a result.

For

After their cessation of employment in 2022, each of Messrs. Coughlin, Gavrilenya and Freund continued to serve FLEETCOR in a further discussionconsulting capacity to help ensure a smooth transition of these benefits, see “Employment agreementstheir responsibilities. Messrs. Gavrilenya and offer letters”Freund ceased such service on December 31, 2022, and “Potential payments on terminationMr. Coughlin is expect to continue such service until May 1, 2023. During such consulting service, each such officer is or change in control.”

Ourwas eligible to exercise his vested stock option awards, but did not receive any other compensation.

Certain Perquisites. In 2022, we provided relocation benefits to Mr. King, in connection with his relocation from the United Kingdom to the United States. Also during 2022, we provided vehicle allowances to Mr. Netto and restricted stock award agreementsMr. King. For more information, see the “2022 Summary Compensation Table” below.

Process to Review, Revise, and Set Compensation

The compensation committee is responsible for administering our executive compensation program and making decisions with respect to the compensation paid to our NEOs. In making such decisions, the compensation committee considers a variety of factors, including:

The compensation committee’s evaluation of the competitive market, including referencing peer group data
The feedback received from our shareholders and proxy advisory firms
The roles and responsibilities of our executives, including each executive’s impact on creating shareholder value

The individual experience and skills of, and expected contributions from, our executives
Pay relative to other NEOs at the Company
The individual performance of our executives during the year and the historical performance levels of our executives
Our overall financial performance

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant: All services performed by Exequity were conducted under the direction or authority of the compensation committee. The compensation committee has considered the required independence factors outlined by the SEC and NYSE rules in assessing the independence of Exequity. Consideration was also given by the compensation committee under those required independence factors, plus all other relevant factors, to whether the work performed by Exequity could give rise to a potential conflict of interest. Based on this review, the compensation committee did not identify any conflict of interest raised by the work performed by Exequity.


2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement41


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Role of Management: Our CEO provides substantial input to the compensation committee in reviewing the performance of the other executive officers and making compensation recommendations for executive officers who report directly to him.

The CEO does not participate in determining the amount of his own compensation. Decisions regarding the compensation of our 2002 Plan do not provideCEO are made by the compensation committee.

Compensation Peer Group

We considered the compensation levels, programs and practices of industry peer companies to assist us in setting compensation for accelerated vesting under any circumstances.

Under our 2010 PlanNEOs by considering market competitiveness and the related stock optiongoal of motivating our executives to appropriately drive corporate performance. The compensation committee periodically reviews and stock grant agreements, all conditionsupdates the list of companies comprising the peer group to provide an appropriate marketplace focus.

The compensation committee last modified the peer group for purposes of 2021 compensation decisions, as disclosed in our 2022 proxy statement. The compensation committee evaluates multiple criteria in determining the appropriate peer group, including industry, revenue, market capitalization, competitors to our various lines of business, business models and profitability. The compensation committee determined that it was appropriate to continue to use the same peer group for purposes of 2022 compensation decisions for our NEOs.

The compensation committee referred to the exercise2022 Industry Peer Group (as defined below) in setting compensation for 2022 for our NEOs. Generally, the compensation committee references cash-based compensation at or below market levels and equity-based compensation (based on target levels) at or above market levels, resulting in total target compensation at or above the peer median for our CEO and generally below the peer median for our other NEOs. Although the compensation committee includes this market data and its general understanding of outstanding options and issuancecurrent compensation practices in the market in the overall mix of factors it considers in assessing NEO compensation, it does not target a mathematically precise market position for total compensation or forfeitureany individual element of outstanding stock grants will be deemed satisfied as

compensation. Comparisons to the peer group for purposes of this Proxy Statement are based on an adjustment of the effective datepeer group compensation data by the Company to account for the passage of time.

The peer group used for purposes of 2022 compensation decisions (the “2022 Industry Peer Group”) is illustrated in the following table:

2022 Industry Peer Group
Alliance Data Systems Corporation
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
Black Knight, Inc.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.
Equifax Inc.
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
Fair Isaac Corporation
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Fiserv, Inc.
Global Payments Inc.
Intuit Inc.
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Mastercard Incorporated
Paychex, Inc.
Paycom Software, Inc.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Wex, Inc.

422023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


05. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Information on Other Compensation-Related Topics

Stock Ownership Policy. Our continuing executive officers (other than Ms. Vickery) are subject to stock ownership requirements (expressed as a changemultiple of base salary). In response to input in control, only ifour shareholder outreach process, we increased the stock ownership guideline requirements in 2019 to the following levels (which must be obtained within five years):

Chief Executive Officer 6x

Chief Financial Officer 4x

All Other Executive Officers 3x

Ms. Vickery, who is currently serving as our interim Chief Financial Officer and was not previously an executive officer, is not subject to the stock ownership requirements. Currently, all of our other continuing NEOs are in compliance with this policy or (in our view) are on track to meet the required ownership level within the applicable time period.

Insider Trading Policy. The Company maintains an insider trading policy applicable to all directors and employees. The policy provides that Company personnel may not buy, sell or engage in other transactions in the Company’s stock while in possession of material non-public information, buy or sell securities of other companies while in possession of material non-public information about those companies they become aware of as a result of a change in control allbusiness dealings between the Company and those companies, or disclose material non-public information to any unauthorized persons outside of the outstanding optionsCompany. The policy also restricts trading for a limited group of Company employees (including all directors and stock grants granted under the 2010 Plan are not continued in full forceNEOs) to defined window periods which align with our quarterly earnings releases.

Anti-Hedging and effect or there is no assumption or substitution of the options and stock grants (with their terms and conditions unchanged) in connection with such change in control. In addition, if outstanding options or stock grants are continued in full force and effect or there is an assumption or substitution of the options and stock grants in connection with a change in control, then any conditions to the exercise of an employee’s outstanding options and any issuance and forfeiture conditions of outstanding stock grants will automatically expire and have no further force or effect on or after the date that the employee’s service terminates, if the employee’s employment with FleetCor is terminated at our initiative for reasons other than “cause” (as defined in the 2010 Plan) or is terminated at the employee’s initiative for “good reason” (as defined in the 2010 Plan) within the two-year period starting on the date of the change in control (often called a “double trigger” change in control vesting).

A change in control means, generally:
any sale by us of all or substantially all of our assets or our consummation of any merger, consolidation, reorganization or business combination with any person, except for certain transactions specified in the 2010 Plan;
the acquisition by any person, other than certain acquisition specified in the 2010 Plan, of 30% or more of the combined voting power of our then-outstanding voting securities;
a change in the composition of our Board of Directors that causes less than a majority of the directors to be directors that meet one or more of the descriptions to be set forth in the 2010 Plan; or
stockholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution, other than as provided in the 2010 Plan.
Executive Equity Ownership Guidelines
Our executive officers are encouraged to hold significant equity interests in the company. Our Board expects the following executive officers to own or to acquire, within five years of appointment to such officer position or within five years from December 31, 2010, whichever is later, shares of our common stock having a market value of a multiple of his or her base salary as indicated below:
• Chief Executive Officer3.0x
• Chief Financial Officer2.0x
• Chief Operating Officer2.0x
• All Other Executive Officers1.5x
Our Board recognizes that exceptions to this policy may be necessary or appropriate in individual cases, and the chairman of the compensation committee may approve such exceptions from time to time, as he deems appropriate.
Hedging and Pledging
Policy. Derivative securities are securities, contracts or arrangements whosethe value of which varies in relation to the price of our securities. For example, derivative securities would include exchange-traded put or call options, as well as individually arranged derivative transactions, such as prepaid forwards. Many forms of derivatives are speculative in nature (meaning that their value fluctuates based on short-term

30






changes in the price of our shares), and the purchase or sale of such derivatives by our employees could motivate them to take actions that are in conflict with the long-term interests of other stockholdersshareholders and could also cause the appearance of misuse of inside information.

Accordingly, our

Our employees, officers and directors are prohibited by our insider trading compliance policy from purchasing or selling derivative securities, entering into derivatives contracts relating to our stock or otherwise engaging in hedging transactions. The prohibition on hedging transactions does not apply to stock options and other interests issuedawards under our employee benefit plans. Furthermore, our insider trading compliance policy prohibits executive officers and directors from pledging or otherwise using as collateral shares of our common stock.

Section 162(m)
Section 162(m)shares as collateral.

Equity Grant Practices. We generally grant equity-based incentives annually during the first calendar quarter. To date there has been no set program for the award of incremental periodic grants, and our compensation committee retains discretion to make equity awards at any time, including in connection with the promotion of an executive, to reward an executive for extraordinary performance or the assumption of additional responsibilities or for retention purposes.

Clawback Policy. In 2019, in response to shareholder input received during our outreach process, as well as the results of a shareholder proposal submitted to shareholders in 2019, we adopted a new clawback policy applicable to our executive officers, including our NEOs, which applies to all incentive-based compensation earned by our executive officers. The clawback policy provides that if our compensation committee determines that an executive officer engaged in misconduct that contributed to the Company being required to make a restatement of its financial statements, the Company will promptly recover from such executive officer all incentive-based compensation received that was in excess of the Code limits a public company’s deductionincentive-based compensation such executive officer would have received under the restated financial results of the Company.

No Excise Tax Gross-Ups. The Company does not provide excise tax gross-ups for federal income tax purposes to not more than $1 millionany of its NEOs.

Risk Assessment in Compensation Programs. We believe our compensation paid to certain executive officers in a calendar year. Compensation above $1 million may be deducted if it is “performance-based compensation.” Ourprograms encourage and reward prudent business judgment without encouraging undue risk. The compensation committee evaluates the effects ofreviews our compensation limits of Section 162(m)programs for features that might encourage inappropriate risk-taking. We believe our compensation policies and provides compensation inpractices do not create undue risks that are reasonably likely to have a manner consistent with FleetCor’s best interests and those of our stockholders.material adverse effect on us.




2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement43


31







06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

2022 Summary Compensation Table for 2016

The following table shows the compensation for each of the named executive officers calculated in accordance with SEC rules and regulations.

NEOs.

The amounts presented below in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns represent the grant date fair value of awards granted to the named executive officersNEOs and may not reflect the actual value to be realized by each executive officer. Variables that can affect the actual value realized by the named executive officer include achievement levels of performance targets, economic and market risks associated with stock and option awards and performance unit valuation based on the market price of FleetCor’s stock.NEO. The actual value realized by the named executive officer will not be determined until the time of vesting in the case of restricted stock,Performance Shares and performance-based restricted stock,Performance-Based RSUs, or until option exercise in the case of option awards.

Named Executive Officer Year Salary ($)(1) Bonus ($)(2) Stock Awards ($)(3) Option Awards ($)(4) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(5) All Other Compensation ($)(6) Total ($)
Ronald F. Clarke 2016 $1,000,000
 $
 $13,387,500
 $13,340,451
 $1,625,000
 $25,112
 $29,378,063
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors 2015 $1,000,000
 $
 $7,782,500
 $
 $1,375,000
 $24,398
 $10,181,898
 2014 $1,000,002
 $175,000
 $14,766,000
 $
 $1,425,000
 $21,069
 $17,387,071
                 
Eric R. Dey 2016 $373,077
 $
 $167,754
 $799,164
 $159,375
 $26,517
 $1,525,887
Chief Financial Officer 2015 $344,231
 $
 $197,676
 $1,280,845
 $232,750
 $25,803
 $2,081,305
  2014 $325,000
 $28,125
 $170,928
 $
 $121,875
 $22,474
 $668,402
                 
John S. Coughlin 2016 $398,077
 $
 $674,146
 $1,166,960
 $300,000
 $26,821
 $2,566,004
Executive Vice President—Global Corporate Development 2015 $372,116
 $
 $197,676
 $
 $
 $25,987
 $595,779
 2014 $348,077
 $37,500
 $7,018,513
 $4,935,685
 $262,500
 $22,978
 $12,625,253
                
                 
Charles Freund 2016 $343,077
 $56,875
 $167,754
 $799,164
 $43,125
 $24,975
 $1,434,970
Executive Vice President—Global Sales               
               
                 
Todd W. House 2016 $398,077
 $70,000
 $1,888,104
 $799,164
 $80,000
 $28,269
 $3,263,614
President—North America, Direct Issuing, U.S. Telematics and Efectivale 2015 $372,116
 $
 $197,676
 $
 $131,250
 $27,236
 $728,278
 2014 $348,077
 $35,000
 $3,714,768
 $1,690,040
 $140,000
 $24,226
 $5,952,111
                
______________

Name and Principal
Position

Year

Salary
($)(1)

Bonus
($)(2)

Stock
Awards
($)(3)

Option
Awards
($)(4)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)(5)

All Other
Compensation
($)(6)

Total ($)

Ronald F. Clarke2022$1,176,923$2,776,500$33,575$3,986,998

Chief Executive Officer

 and Chairman of the
Board of Directors

 

2021$1,000,000$55,556,000$1,335,000$32,473$57,923,473
2020$692,308$587,500$31,418$1,311,225

Alissa B. Vickery

Interim Chief Financial
Officer and Chief

Accounting Officer

 

2022

$247,115

$56,250

$250,024

 $300,009

$93,750

$3,086

$950,235

 

 

Charles R. Freund2022$388,774$1,535,089$2,400,075$27,473$4,351,410

Former Chief

Financial Officer

 

2021$450,000$1,535,353$1,183,576$135,000$34,205$3,338,134
 2020$361,635$50,000$844,897$1,000,022$80,156$32,368$2,369,077
Armando L. Netto (7)2022$483,780$64,482$1,535,089$2,400,075$226,582$32,779$4,742,787

Group President,

Brazil

 

2021$425,945$1,535,353$5,310,426$460,021$31,069$7,762,813
 2020$347,036$971,520$1,200,016$227,698$31,413$2,777,684
Alan King (7)2022$399,089$1,535,089$2,400,075$393,986$253,271$4,981,510

Group President,

Global Fleet

 

2021$409,287$1,335,373$986,337$385,161$22,601$3,138,759
 2020$423,077$844,897$1,000,022$143,455$20,553$2,432,003
Alexey Gavrilenya2022$180,000$1,535,089$2,400,075$34,439$4,149,603

Former Group President,

North America Fuel

 

2021$400,000$1,535,353$1,183,576$360,000$36,625$3,515,554
 2020$316,154$971,520$1,200,016$93,600$31,756$2,613,046
John S. Coughlin2022$155,769$1,535,089$2,400,075$33,916$4,124,849

Former Group President,

Corporate Payments

 

2021$450,000$1,535,353$1,183,576$280,125$33,766$3,482,820
 2020$372,404$971,520$1,200,016$121,078$30,341$2,695,358

(1) Represents the salary earned for the applicable year.

(2) For Mr. Netto and Ms. Vickery in 2022, represents the portion of such officer’s annual cash incentive award that was paid as a result of the compensation committee’s exercise of discretion to increase the payout of the award.

(3) Includes the aggregate grant date fair value for stock awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to value these awards can be found in Note 6 to the financial statements included in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For an overview of the features of the 2022 awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Equity Awards.” Grant date fair values for Performance Shares and Performance-Based RSUs are computed based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date for the award. The grant date fair value of the Performance Share awards, assuming maximum performance with respect to the applicable performance goals, would be as follows: $250,024 for Ms. Vickery; $335,019 for Mr. Freund; $335,019 for Mr. Netto; $335,019 for Mr. King; $335,019 for Mr. Gavrilenya; and $335,019 for Mr. Coughlin. The grant date fair value of the Performance-Based RSU awards, assuming maximum performance with respect to the applicable performance goals, would be as follows: $1,800,106 for Mr. Freund; $1,800,106 for Mr. Netto; $1,800,106 for Mr. King; $1,800,106 for Mr. Gavrilenya; and $1,800,106 for Mr. Coughlin.

(4) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value for the stock option awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to value these awards can be found in Note 6 to the financial statements included in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For an overview of the features of the 2022 awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Equity Awards.”

(5) Represents the amounts earned under the annual cash incentive award programs based on achievement of performance goals under the program. For a description of the program, including the 2022 performance goals, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Annual Cash Incentive.”

44
(1)This column represents the salary earned for the applicable year.2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

(2)This column represents the discretionary bonus amounts paid for the applicable year. For a description of these payments in 2016, see “—Components of compensation—Annual cash incentive compensation.”
(3)This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value for the stock awards granted/modified in the applicable year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to value these awards can be found in Note 5 to the financial statements included in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For an overview of the features of the 2016 awards, see “—Components of compensation—Long-term equity incentive awards”. Awards with performance conditions are computed based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date for the award. The amounts shown for Messrs. Clarke, Dey, Coughlin, Freund and House represent the maximum grant date fair value for the performance-based restricted stock granted or modified in 2016. The incremental maximum grant date fair value of Mr. Clarke's performance-based restricted stock award granted in 2014 and modified in 2016 is $259,500. The incremental maximum grant date fair value of Mr. Coughlin's performance-based restricted stock award granted in 2014 and modified in 2016 is $17,194. The maximum grant date fair value of Mr. House's performance-based restricted stock award granted in 2014 and modified in 2016 declined $51,570.
(4)This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value for the stock option awards granted/modified in the applicable year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to value these awards can be found in Note 5 to the financial statements included in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For an overview of the features of the 2016 awards, see “—Components of compensation—Long-term equity incentive awards”. Awards with performance conditions are computed based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date for the award.
(5)This column represents the amounts earned under the applicable year annual cash incentive award programs based on achievement of performance goals under the program. For a description of the program, including the 2016 performance goals under the program, see “—Components of compensation—Annual cash incentive compensation.”
(6)The following table breaks down the amounts shown in this column for 2016:

32







06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

(6) The following table breaks down the amounts included in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2022:

All Other Compensation

All other
Compensation

 

Health
Benefit
Premiums
Long-Term
Care
Premiums
Retirement
Plan
Contributions

Vehicle
Allowance 

Life
Insurance

 

Other

 

Total

 

Ronald F. Clarke$30,474$2,441$660$33,575
Alissa B. Vickery$340$2,086$660$3,086
Charles R. Freund$25,395$1,008$519$550$27,473
Armando L. Netto (7)$5,289$25,123(8)$779$1,587(9)$32,779
Alan King (7)$15,455$1,977$12,524(8)$275$223,040(10)$253,271
Alexey Gavrilenya$30,474$1,505$1,800$660$34,439
John S. Coughlin$30,474$1,397$1,385$660$33,916

(7) As Mr. Netto is based in Brazil, his compensation is denominated in Brazilian Real. All amounts for Mr. Netto have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average exchange rate of $1 to R$5.1535 for 2022, $1 to R$5.3885 for 2021, and $1 to R$5.1030 for 2020. Prior to his relocation to the United States, Mr. King was based in the United Kingdom. For compensation earned by Mr. King on or prior to October 31, 2022, amounts were denominated in British Pounds Sterling and have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average exchange rate of $1 to £0.8080 for 2022, 1 to £ 0.7269 for 2021, and 1 to £ 0.7791 for 2020. Compensation earned by Mr. King after October 31, 2022 was paid in

U.S. dollars.

(8) Amount in the “Vehicle Allowance” column for Mr. Netto and Mr. King represents the aggregate of monthly cash vehicle allowances paid to each officer during 2022.

(9) Amount in the “Other” column for Mr. Netto reflects the cost to the Company of a government mandated food benefit.

(10) Amount in the “Other” column for Mr. King reflects housing allowance and relocation amounts.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement45


Name Company 401(k) Match Health Benefit Premiums Long-Term Care Premiums Life Insurance Premiums Total
Ronald F. Clarke $
 $23,771
 $1,037
 $305
 $25,112
Eric R. Dey $
 $25,471
 $742
 $305
 $26,517
John S. Coughlin $
 $25,271
 $1,246
 $305
 $26,821
Charles Freund $
 $23,771
 $900
 $305
 $24,975
Todd W. House $1,500
 $25,471
 $994
 $305
 $28,269

06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR 2016

2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information about awards granted in 20162022 to each of the NEOs:

 

 

Estimated Possible Payouts 

Under Non-Equity Incentive 

Plan Awards (1)

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards

 

All Other 

Option 

Awards: 

Number of 

Securities 

Underlying 

Options (2)

Exercise or 

Base Price 

of Option 

Awards

 

Grant Date Fair Value

of Stock and Option

Awards (3)

 

       
Name

Grant

Date

 

Threshold

($)

 

Target

($)

 

Maximum

($)

 

Threshold

(#)

 

Target

(#)

 

Maximum

(#)

 

 

(#)

 

($/Sh)

 

($)

Ronald F.          
Clarke $675,000$1,800,000$3,600,000 —
    
Alissa B. $37,500$75,000$93,750— 
Vickery1/24/221,109 (5)$250,024
 1/24/224,588$225.45$300,009
           
Charles R. $168,750$337,500$506,250   
Freund          
 1/24/222,6625,323 (4)7,985$1,200,070
 1/24/221,486 (5)$335,019
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037
           
  $182,727$365,455$548,182      
Armando L.          
Netto (6)1/24/222,6625,323(4)7,985$1,200,070
 1/24/221,486(5)— $335,019
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037
           
  $139,711$279,422$419,134
Alan King (6)          
 1/24/222,6625,323 (4)7,985$1,200,070
 1/24/221,486 (5)$335,019
 1/24/22— 18,352$225.45$1,200,037
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037
  
Alexey1/24/222,6625,323 (4)7,985$1,200,070
Gavrilenya1/24/221,486 (5)$335,019
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037
  
John S.1/24/222,6625,323 (4)7,985$1,200,070
Coughlin1/24/221,486 (5)$335,019
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037
 1/24/2218,352$225.45$1,200,037

(1) Reflects the threshold, target and maximum amounts that could be earned under our 2022 annual cash incentive program for each NEO. For information concerning this program, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation—Annual Cash Incentive.” See the 2022 Summary Compensation Table for actual amounts earned for 2022 performance.

(2) Reflects the number of time-based stock options granted in 2022. For information concerning these grants and the vesting terms, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Equity Awards.”

462023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

(3) Reflects the grant date fair value of Performance Share, Performance-Based RSU, and stock option awards granted to each of the named executive officers.

    Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) Estimated Future Payouts Under the Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) All Other Options Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (3) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Award(4) 
Name Grant/Modification Date Target ($) Maximum ($) Target (#) (#) ($/Share) ($) 
Ronald F. Clarke   $1,000,000
 $1,875,000
         
  1/20/2016     50,000
     $5,745,000
 
  1/20/2016       425,000
 $114.90
 $13,340,451
 
  6/7/2016     50,000
     $7,642,500
 
Eric R. Dey   $187,500
 $243,750
         
  1/20/2016     1,460
     $167,754
 
  1/20/2016       44,000
 $114.90
 $799,164
 
John S. Coughlin   $200,000
 $300,000
         
  1/20/2016     1,460
     $167,754
 
  1/20/2016       64,250
 $114.90
 $1,166,960
 
  6/7/2016     3,313
     $506,392
 
Charles Freund   $172,500
 $241,500
         
  1/20/2016     1,460
     $167,754
 
  1/20/2016       44,000
 $114.90
 $799,164
 
Todd W. House   $200,000
 $310,000
         
  1/20/2016     1,460
     $167,754
 
  1/20/2016     3,000
     $344,700
 
  1/20/2016       44,000
 $114.90
 $799,164
 
  6/7/2016     3,000
     $458,550
 
  6/7/2016     6,000
     $917,100
 
______________
(1)These columns reflect the target and maximum amounts that could be earned under our 2016 annual cash incentive program for each named executive officer. There is no threshold amount under the program. For information concerning this program, see “—Components of compensation—Annual cash incentive compensation.” The maximum estimated payouts under the non-equity incentive plan awards do not include any discretionary bonuses that may awarded by the Compensation Committee. See “Summary Compensation Table for 2016” for actual amounts awarded for 2016 performance.
(2)This column reflects the number of shares of performance-based restricted stock granted/modified in 2016.. These awards do not have a threshold or maximum amount. For information concerning these grants, see “—Components of compensation—Long-term equity incentive awards—2016 Equity awards.”
(3)This column reflects the number of stock options granted in 2016, subject to time vesting. For information concerning this grant and the vesting schedule, see “—Components of compensation—Long-term equity incentive awards—2016 Equity awards.”
(4)This column reflects the grant date fair value of the restricted stock and stock option awards under FASB ASC Topic 718 granted to each of the named executive officers in 2016. officers in 2022 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Awards with performance conditions are computed based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date for the award. There can be no assurance that the grant date fair value of stock and option awards will ever be realized by the named executive officers.

(4) Reflects the Performance-Based RSU awards granted in 2022. For information concerning these grants, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Equity Awards.”

(5) Reflects the Performance Share awards granted in 2022. For information concerning these grants, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Equity Awards.”

(6) As Mr. Netto is based in Brazil, his cash compensation is denominated in Brazilian Real. Non-equity incentive plan award amounts for Mr. Netto have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average exchange rate of $1 to R$5.1535 for 2022. Prior to his relocation to the United States, Mr. King was based in the United Kingdom. Non-equity incentive plan award amounts for Mr. King have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average exchange rate of $1 to £0.8080 for 2022.

For information regarding the amount of salary and bonus in proportion to total compensation of our NEOs, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis Components of Compensation and Target Direct Compensation Mix” above. For information regarding the employment agreements and offer letters with our NEOs, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End

The following table shows the number of stock options and stock awards held by the NEOs on December 31, 2022:

  OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS

Name

Grant Date

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable (1)

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options(#)
Unexercisable (1)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)(2)

Option
Exercise
Price

($)

Option
Expiration
Date

 

Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
Have
Not
Vested
(#) (3)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested

($) (4)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights that
Have Not
Vested (#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other Rights
that Have Not
Vested ($) (4)

Ronald F.

Clarke

12/4/2014850,000$149.6812/4/2024 
1/20/2016425,000$114.901/20/2026 
1/25/2017850,000$150.741/25/2027 
9/30/2021850,000$261.2712/31/2024 
Alissa B.
Vickery
10/19/201610,000$174.3510/19/2026 
1/25/20172,000$150.741/25/2027 
 5/5/20173,276$133.405/5/2027 
 4/22/20196,0002,000$252.504/22/2029 
 4/22/2019 99$18,184
 4/10/20202,2122,212$224.994/10/2030 
 10/21/2020 112$20,572
 3/12/2021 265$48,765
 1/24/20224,588$225.451/24/2032 
 1/24/2022 1,109 (5)$203,701
Charles R.
Freund
2/27/201915,000$231.703/31/2023 
3/27/202010,443$196.183/31/2023 
1/25/20214,116$261.073/31/2023 

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement47




06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

  OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS

Name

Grant Date

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable (1)

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options(#)
Unexercisable (1)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)(2)

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

Option
Expiration
Date

 

Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
Have Not
Vested
(#) (3)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
($) (4)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights that
Have Not
Vested (#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other Rights
that Have Not
Vested ($) (4)

Armando

L. Netto

1/20/201618,500$114.901/20/2026 
5/5/201730,000$133.405/5/2027 
 3/1/201815,000$199.753/1/2028 
 2/27/201915,0005,000$231.702/27/2029 
 3/27/202012,53112,532$196.183/27/2030 
 10/21/2020 1,020$187,354
 1/25/20214,11612,350$261.071/25/2031 
 1/25/2021 3,526$647,656
 4/21/202135,000$196.183/27/2030 
 1/24/202218,352$225.451/24/2032 
 1/24/202218,352$225.451/24/2032 
 1/24/2022 1,486(5)$272,948
 1/24/2022 5,323(6)$977,729
Alan King8/1/201611,272$152.318/1/2026 
 5/5/201715,000$133.405/5/2027 
 2/27/20197,2002,400$231.702/27/2029 
 3/27/202010,44310,443$196.183/27/2030 
 10/21/2020 917$168,435
 1/25/20213,43010,292$261.071/25/2031 
 1/25/2021 2,922$536,713
 1/24/202218,352$225.451/24/2032 
 1/24/202218,352$225.451/24/2032 
 1/24/2022 1,486(5)$272,948
 1/24/2022 5,323(6)$977,729
Alexey
Gavrilenya
10/21/201515,000$144.593/31/2023 
1/25/201788,000$150.743/31/2023 
5/5/201730,000$133.403/31/2023 
2/27/201912,000$231.703/31/2023 
3/27/202012,531$196.183/31/2023 
1/25/20214,116$261.073/31/2023 

482023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


33





06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

  OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS

Name

Grant Date

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable (1)

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options(#)
Unexercisable (1)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)(2)

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

Option
Expiration
Date

 

Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
Have Not
Vested
(#) (3)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
($) (4)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights that
Have Not
Vested (#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other Rights
that Have Not
Vested ($) (4)

John S. Coughlin7/15/201428,500$132.247/15/2024 
1/20/201617,150$114.901/20/2026 
1/25/201763,000$150.741/25/2027 
5/5/201730,000$133.405/5/2027 
2/27/201911,250$231.702/27/2029 
3/27/202012,531$196.183/27/2030 
1/25/20214,116$261.071/25/2031 

(1) Stock options in these columns generally vest in substantially equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date.

(2) For Mr. Clarke, reflects a performance-based stock option award granted to Mr. Clarke in 2021, reported at the target performance level, which is the portion of the award that would be eligible to vest after achievement of both of the stock price hurdles applicable to the award. For Mr. Clarke to earn the full award, our stock price must achieve two stock price hurdles by December 31, 2024, and any portion of the award earned based on stock price performance will generally vest in substantially equal increments on each of March 31, 2022, September 30, 2022 and March 31, 2023. Neither stock price hurdle applicable to this award had been achieved as of December 31, 2022. For Mr. Netto, reflects a performance-based stock option originally granted to Mr. Netto in 2020, for which the performance goals were established in April 2021. A portion of Mr. Netto’s award vested based on the achievement of the applicable performance goals as of the first quarter of 2023. For more information regarding these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Equity Awards.”

(3) For Mr. King and Mr. Netto, amounts in this column reflect the unvested portion of Performance-Based RSU awards granted in 2020 and 2021 that were earned based on 2020 performance and 2021 performance, respectively, and which vest in substantially equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date. For Ms. Vickery, amounts in this column reflect the unvested portion of Performance Share awards granted in 2019, 2020 and 2021 that were earned based on 2019, 2020 and 2021 performance, respectively. Ms. Vickery’s earned 2019, 2020, and 2021 Performance Shares are 5/8 vested on the first anniversary of the grant date, and 1/8 vested on each of the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

(4) Market value of Performance Shares and Performance-Based RSUs that have not vested is calculated using $183.68, the Company’s closing stock price on December 30, 2022 (the last trading day of 2022).

(5) Represents Performance Shares unvested and unearned at December 31, 2022, where performance targets are based on achieving financial or other performance goals for the period ending December 31, 2022. The earned portion of the award generally pays out after certification of the performance goals, except that the earned portion of Ms. Vickery’s 2022 Performance Share award vests as to 5/8 of the award on the first anniversary of the grant date, and as to 3/8 of the award on the second anniversary of the grant date. For information regarding the portion of the awards actually earned after the compensation committee’s certification of the performance goals, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Equity Awards.”

(6) Represents Performance-Based RSUs unvested and unearned at December 31, 2022, where performance targets are based on achieving Company-wide or business unit performance goals. These awards were generally subject to a performance period ending on December 31, 2022, and the earned portions of the awards generally vest in substantially equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. The awards are reported based on the target performance level. For information regarding the portion of the awards actually earned after the compensation committee’s certification of the performance goals, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of 2022 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Equity Awards.”



OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table shows the number of stock options exercised and stock vested in 20162022 by each of the named executive officers.

NEOs:

 

OPTION AWARDS

 

STOCK AWARDS 

Name

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise (#)
Value Realized on
Exercise ($)(1)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)(1)
Ronald F. Clarke258,333$49,521,306 
Alissa B. Vickery 594$139,747
Charles R. Freund132,000$5,044,365 4,107$948,754
Armando L. Netto 4,065$938,420
Alan King 3,662$845,368
Alexey Gavrilenya 3,352$772,280
John S. Coughlin72,100$4,644,047 3,708$862,987

(1) Value realized on exercise with respect to option awards is calculated based on the difference between the market price of the common stock at exercise and the exercise price of the stock options. Value realized with respect to stock awards is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of vesting. There is no guarantee the NEOs actually received or will receive the value indicated upon the ultimate disposition of the underlying shares of common stock.

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement49

 

  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise(#) Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(#) Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1) 
Ronald F. Clarke 
 $
 255,666
 $31,068,523
 
Eric R. Dey 26,316
 $4,415,825
 1,270
 $189,624
 
John S. Coughlin 
 $
 1,270
 $193,535
 
Charles Freund 26,316
 $3,917,202
 1,270
 $193,650
 
Todd W. House 28,490
 $4,705,604
 7,270
 $835,323
 
______________
(1)Value realized is calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of exercise or vesting. There is no guarantee the named executive officers actually received or will receive the value indicated upon the ultimate disposition of the underlying shares of common stock.

06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2016
The following table shows the number

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Employment Agreements, Severance and Change of stock options and restricted stock held by the named executive officers on December 31, 2016.

  Option AwardsStock Awards
Name Number of securities underlying unexercised options(#) exercisable Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable(1) Option exercise price ($) Option grant date Option expiration date Equity incentive plan awards; number of unearned shares or other rights that have not vested (#)(3) Equity incentive plan awards; market or payout value of unearned shares or other rights that have not vested ($)(4)
Ronald F. Clarke 750,000
 
 $10.00
 6/17/2009 6/17/2019    
  833,332
 
 $23.00
 12/14/2010 12/14/2020    
  833,333
 
 $35.04
 6/29/2012 6/29/2022    
  637,500
 212,500
(2) 
$149.68
 12/4/2014 12/4/2024    
  
 425,000
 $114.90
 1/20/2016 1/20/2026    
            150,000
 $21,228,000
Eric R. Dey 
 44,000
 $155.65
 2/23/2015 2/23/2025    
  
 44,000
 $114.90
 1/20/2016 1/20/2026    
            1,460
 $206,619
John S. Coughlin 7,000
 
 $20.00
 10/16/2010 10/16/2020    
  64,250
 64,250
 $132.24
 7/15/2014 7/15/2024    
  
 64,250
 $114.90
 1/20/2016 1/20/2026    
            37,897
 $5,363,183
Charles Freund 
 44,000
 $155.65
 2/23/2015 2/23/2025    
  
 44,000
 $114.90
 1/20/2016 1/20/2026    
            1,460
 $206,619
Todd W. House 
 44,000
 $132.24
 7/15/2014 7/15/2024    
  
 44,000
 $114.90
 1/20/2016 1/20/2026    
            16,460
 $2,329,419
______________
(1)Messrs. Clarke, Dey, Coughlin, Freund and House's stock options granted on January 20, 2016 will vest ratably on January 20, 2017 and 2018. Messrs. Dey and Freund's stock options granted on February 23, 2015 will vest ratably on February 23, 2017 and 2018. Mr. Coughlin's stock options granted on July 15, 2014 vested or will vest ratably on July 15, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. Mr. House's stock options granted on July 15, 2014 will vest ratably on July 15, 2017 and 2018.
(2)Mr. Clarke’s performance based stock options granted on December 4, 2014 vests subject to performance targets requiring FleetCor earnings and certain adjusted net income per diluted share “EPS” for 2015, which was determined as met by the Compensation Committee on January 20, 2016. As a result of this determination, 50% (425,000 options) vested on January 20, 2015, 25% (212,500 options) vested on December 31, 2016 and 25% (212,500 options) will vest on December 31, 2017.
(3)Represents performance-based restricted stock awards, where performance targets are based on achieving company-wide or individual or business unit performance goals during 2015, 2016 and/or 2017.
(4)Market value of shares of restricted stock that have not vested is calculated using $141.52, the Company's closing stock price on December 30, 2016.


34






EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS, SEVERANCE AND CHANGE OF CONTROL BENEFITS
Control Benefits

Ronald F. Clarke

We entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Clarke on November 29,in 2010, which amended and restated his employment agreement of September 25, 2000.

The initial term of the employment agreement was through December 31, 2011. Per the agreement, the agreement automatically renews for successive one year periods unless we provide notice at least 30 days prior to the expiration date.
Mr. Clarke is entitled to an annual base salary of at least $687,500, with annual increases at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
We may terminate Mr. Clarke’s employment under the agreement by providing 30 days prior written notice and the payment of all sums due under the agreement. If we terminate Mr. Clarke’s employment for any reason other than for “cause” (as defined below), including through non-renewal of the agreement, Mr. Clarke will receive (1) cash severance payments, in equal monthly installments over 12 months (the “Severance Period”), in an amount equal to 150% of his then- current annual base salary plus any accrued and unpaid vacation; (2) at his election, payment of his health insurance premiums for coverage under COBRA in amounts equal to those made immediately prior to his termination until the earlier of the expiration of the Severance Period or his commencement of employment with another employer; and (3) continuation of coverage during the Severance Period under our life and disability insurance plans, if permitted by the key terms of which are:

The agreement term automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless we provide notice at least 30 days prior to the expiration date.

Mr. Clarke is entitled to an annual base salary of at least $687,500.

If we terminate Mr. Clarke’s employment other than for “cause” (as defined below), including through non-renewal of the agreement, Mr. Clarke will receive (1) cash severance payments, in equal monthly installments over 12 months, in an amount equal to 150% of his then-current annual base salary plus any accrued and unpaid vacation, (2) payment of his health insurance premiums for coverage under COBRA in amounts equal to those made immediately prior to his termination until, at his election, the earlier of the expiration of the severance period or his commencement of employment with another employer and (3) continuation of coverage during the severance period under our life and disability insurance plans, if permitted by the terms of the plans.

If within 12 months following a change in control Mr. Clarke’s employment is terminated by him for “good reason” (as defined below) or by the Company other than for cause, in addition to receiving the severance benefits described above, Mr. Clarke can elect to have us purchase from him any remaining Company common stock and stock options in the Company that he held at January 1, 2010 and still holds. The purchase price would be at the fair market value determined in accordance with the employment agreement. Mr. Clarke no longer holds any Company common stock or stock options that he held at January 1, 2010.

If within 12 months following a change in control Mr. Clarke’s employment is terminated by him for good reason or is terminated by the Company for any reason other than cause, Mr. Clarke can elect to have us purchase from him any remaining equity in the Company that he held at January 1, 2010 and still holds. At December 31, 2016, this included 750,000 stock options. The purchase price would be at the fair market value.
In addition to Mr. Clarke’s rights under his employment agreement, he also has all rights and conditions as to stock and stock options granted to him under our 2010 Plan, which provides that all awards will accelerate if Mr. Clarke is terminated without cause within the two year period following a change in control or Mr. Clarke resigns for good reason during such period (a double trigger). The fair market value is determined by the change in control price, if the change in control is a cash transaction, or, in all other cases, by the Board of Directors in good faith.
The employment agreement includes customary non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that apply during his employment with the Company and for one year thereafter, as well as customary confidentiality and intellectual property provisions and a mutual non-disparagement provision.

“Cause” is defined, in general, to mean: Mr. Clarke’s (1) failure to render services to us;us, (2) commission of an act of disloyalty, gross negligence, dishonesty or breach of fiduciary duty; duty, (3) material breach of the agreement;agreement, (4) commission of any crime or act of fraud or embezzlement;embezzlement, (5) misappropriation of our assets;assets, (6) violation of our material written rules or policies;policies, (7) commission of acts generating material adverse publicity toward us;us, (8) commission or conviction of a felony; felony, or (9) death or inability due to disability to perform his essential job functions for a period of three consecutive months.

“Good reason” is defined to mean, following a change in control, and without Mr. Clarke’s written consent: (1) there is a significant diminution in the nature and scope of his authority, duties or responsibilities; (2) a reduction in his annual base salary or total compensation and benefits in the amount of 10% or more; (3) his principal place of employment is relocated to a place that is more than 25 miles from the prior principal place of employment; or (4) he is required to be away from his office 25% more than was required prior to the change in control.

“Change in control” for purposes of Mr. Clarke’s employment agreement generally has the same definitionmeaning given to such term in our 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”), which generally means any of the following: (1) the sale by the Company of all or substantially all of its assets or the consummation by the Company of any merger, consolidation, reorganization, or business combination with any person that results in a substantial change in ownership or leadership, as further described in the 2010 Plan.definition; (2) the acquisition directly or indirectly by any person or group of beneficial ownership of securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the Company that represent 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding voting securities, subject to certain exceptions as described in the definition; (3) turnover of a majority of the Board, subject to certain exceptions; and (4) the approval by the Company’s shareholders of a liquidation or dissolution of the Company, subject to certain exceptions.



502023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Other named executive officers

NEOs

We entered intoprovided offer letter agreements withletters to Messrs. Dey,Freund, Netto, King, Gavrilenya and Coughlin Freund and House in connection with their hiring.hiring or promotion. Consistent with these offer letters and our historichistorical practice, if any of these named executive officersNEOs is terminated by us for any reason other than for cause, we will (1) pay cash severance in the amount of six months of continuation of his then-current base salary and (2) provide health benefits for six months, each upon execution of a general release.

Confidentiality The Company does not hold an offer letter or other individual agreement with Ms. Vickery.

Equity Awards

Our NEOs also have rights under outstanding equity awards, which will accelerate (1) if there is a change in control and Non-Competition Agreements

Under the termsaward is not continued in full force and conditionseffect or there is no assumption or substitution of the employee confidentiality, work product and non-solicitation agreement executed by our named executive officers, which survives anyaward (as described in the applicable award agreement) in connection with such change in control or (2) if the NEO is terminated without cause (as defined in the 2010 Plan) or resigns for good reason (as defined in the 2010 Plan) within two years following a change in control (a “double trigger”).

Mr. Clarke’s 2021 CEO Performance Option is subject to alternative vesting provisions in the event of a termination of his service or a change in control. If Mr. Clarke’s service is terminated by the Company without “cause” (as defined in the award agreement) or by Mr. Clarke for “good reason” (as defined in the award agreement) other than in connection with a change in control as described below, the unvested portion of the award will remain eligible to vest subject to the degree of achievement of the applicable stock price hurdles as of the date of termination, and the vested portion of the option will remain exercisable until the earlier of the 91st day after termination and December 31, 2024.

If Mr. Clarke’s employment terminates due to his death or disability, then the unvested portion of the award will vest (if at all) subject to the degree of achievement of the stock price hurdles, including during the one-year period following the date of termination, and the vested option will remain exercisable until the 366th day after termination or (if earlier) December 31, 2024. If Mr. Clarke dies or becomes disabled after ceasing active service (other than for cause), then the vested portion of the option will remain exercisable until the earlier of the 366th day after the date of such executive’s employment, our named executive officers,death or disability and December 31, 2024.

Mr. Clarke’s award is also subject to double trigger vesting. If the award is not continued, assumed or substituted in connection with a change in control, then the unvested portion of the option will vest based on the degree of attainment of the stock price hurdles as of the day immediately prior to the date of the change in control and Mr. Clarke will have a reasonable right to exercise the vested option as of the date of and immediately prior to the change in control. In the event that the award is continued, assumed or substituted in connection with a change in control, and Mr. Clarke’s service is terminated without cause or for good reason within a period of one year following termination for any reason, have an obligation not to:

disclose certain of our confidential information,
accept employment with certain enumerated competitors,
solicit,two years after the change in competition with our sale of products or services, any of our customers with which such executive had substantial contact within one year of such executive’s termination and

35






recruit or hire, or attempt to recruit or hire, any of our employees, consultants, contractors or other personnel, who have knowledge of certain of our confidential information and with whom such executive had substantial contact within one year of such executive’s termination.
In addition, pursuantcontrol, then the unvested option will vest subject to the employee confidentiality work productdegree of attainment of the stock price hurdles as of the date of termination, and non-solicitation agreement, during the termoption will remain exercisable until the earlier of employment our named executive officers have an obligation not to (i) disclose certainthe 91st day after such termination and December 31, 2024.



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement51


06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Quantification of our confidential information or (ii) accept employment with certain enumerated competitors.


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
Potential Payments

The following table shows the potential payments to the named executive officersNEOs (other than Messrs. Freund and Gavrilenya) upon a termination of employment underin various circumstances, andincluding in connection with a change in control. In preparing the table, we assumed the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2016.

Name Severance Amount ($)(1) Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards ($)(2) Benefits ($)(3) Total ($) 
Ronald F. Clarke         
Termination without cause $1,500,000
 $
 $25,112
 $1,525,112
 
Termination for good reason or termination without cause following a change in control $1,500,000
 $32,753,002
 $25,112
 $34,278,114
 
Change in control $
 $
 $
 $
 
Eric R. Dey         
Termination without cause $187,500
 $
 $13,259
 $200,759
 
Termination without cause following a change in control $187,500
 $1,379,958
 $13,259
 $1,580,717
 
Termination for good reason following a change in control $
 $1,379,958
 $
 $1,379,958
 
Change in control $
 $
 $
 $
 
John S. Coughlin         
Termination without cause $200,000
 $
 $13,411
 $213,411
 
Termination without cause following a change in control $200,000
 $7,813,786
 $13,411
 $8,027,197
 
Termination for good reason following a change in control $
 $7,813,786
 $
 $7,813,786
 
Change in control $
 $
 $
 $
 
Charles Freund         
Termination without cause $172,500
 $
 $12,488
 $184,988
 
Termination without cause following a change in control $172,500
 $1,379,958
 $12,488
 $1,564,946
 
Termination for good reason following a change in control $
 $1,379,958
 $
 $1,379,958
 
Change in control $
 $
 $
 $
 
Todd W. House         
Termination without cause $200,000
 $
 $14,135
 $214,135
 
Termination without cause following a change in control $200,000
 $3,971,059
 $14,135
 $4,185,194
 
Termination for good reason following a change in control $
 $3,971,059
 $
 $3,971,059
 
Change in control $
 $
 $
 $
 
______________
(1)For Mr. Clarke, represents 150% of his then-current annual base salary and any accrued vacation. For Messrs. Dey, Coughlin, Freund and House, represents six months of their then-current annual base salary.
(2)Under Mr. Clarke’s employment agreement he can elect to have us purchase, at fair market value, all outstanding stock options and shares of our stock, owned by him as of January 1, 2010, upon termination for good reason or without cause within 12 months after a change in control. In addition to Mr. Clarke’s rights under his employment agreement, he also has all rights and conditions as to stock and stock options granted to him under our 2010 Plan, which provides that all awards will accelerate if Mr. Clarke is terminated without cause within the two year period following a change in control or Mr. Clarke resigns for good reason during such period. Under our 2010 Plan and the stock option and restricted stock agreements with each named executive officer, all awards will accelerate if the executive is terminated without cause within the two year period following a change in control or the executive resigns for good reason during such period. The value shown above represents the value of the unvested options and restricted stock held by the named executive officers at December 31, 2016, assuming a value of $141.52 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 30, 2016, for which vesting would be accelerated. Our equity incentive award agreements, under our 2002 plan, do not provide accelerated vesting of equity awards under any circumstances.
(3)For Mr. Clarke, represents payment of medical, dental and vision benefits for 12 months. For Messrs. Dey, Coughlin, Freund and House,30, 2022 (the last business day of fiscal 2022). Please see the disclosure following this table for information regarding the actual compensation received by Messrs. Freund and Gavrilenya in connection with their separations. Although Mr. Coughlin continues to provide services to FLEETCOR in a consulting capacity, he ceased to be eligible for severance compensation and benefits after his separation from employment during 2022.

Name

Severance
Amount ($)(1)

Accelerated
Vesting of Equity
Awards ($)(2)

Benefits ($)(3)

Total ($)

Ronald F. Clarke    
Termination without cause$1,800,000$33,575$1,833,575
Termination for good reason or termination without cause following a change in control

$1,800,000

$33,575

$1,833,575

Change in control
Alissa B. Vickery (4)    
Termination without cause$125,000$125,000
Termination without cause following a change in control$125,000$291,133$416,133
Termination for good reason following a change in control$291,133$291,133
Change in control
Armando L. Netto (5)    
Termination without cause$243,636$3,438$247,074
Termination without cause following a change in control$243,636$2,574,642$3,438$2,821,717
Termination for good reason following a change in control$2,574,642$2,574,642
Change in control
Alan King    
Termination without cause$225,000$38,918$263,918
Termination without cause following a change in control$225,000$2,444,781$38,918$2,708,699
Termination for good reason following a change in control$2,444,781$2,444,781
Change in control
John S. Coughlin    
Termination without cause
Termination without cause following a change in control
Termination for good reason following a change in control
Change in control

(1) For Mr. Clarke, represents 150% of his then-current annual base salary and any accrued vacation. For Ms. Vickery, Mr. Netto and Mr. King, represents six months of their then-current annual base salary.

(2) Under our 2010 Plan and the stock option, restricted share and restricted stock unit agreements with each named executive officer, all awards are subject to double trigger vesting in the event of a change in control. The value shown above represents the value of the unvested options, restricted shares and restricted stock units held by the named executive officers at December 30, 2022, assuming a value of $183.68 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 30, 2022 (the last business day of 2022), for which vesting would be accelerated. For options with an exercise price above the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2022, accelerated vesting value was assumed as zero.

(3) For Mr. Clarke, represents payment of medical, dental and vision benefits for 12 months. For Mr. Netto and Mr. King, represents the value of continuation of medical, dental and vision benefits for six months.

(4) As noted above, the Company does not hold an offer letter or other individual agreement with Ms. Vickery. For purposes of this disclosure, we have assumed that Ms. Vickery would receive cash severance compensation similar to other non-CEO named executive officers.

(5) As Mr. Netto is based in Brazil, his cash compensation is denominated in Brazilian Real. All amounts for Mr. Netto have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average exchange rate of $1 to R$5.1535 for 2022. Potential payments to Mr. Netto include the assumed acceleration value of 35,000 performance-based stock options assuming a closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date awarded by the compensation committee.

522023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement

 

 


36





06. 2022 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION



Officer Departures During 2022

After their cessation of employment in 2022, each of Messrs. Coughlin, Gavrilenya and Freund continued to serve FLEETCOR in a consulting capacity to help ensure a smooth transition of their responsibilities. Messrs. Gavrilenya and Freund ceased such service on December 31, 2022, and Mr. Coughlin is expected to continue such service until May 1, 2023. During such consulting service, each such officer is or was eligible to exercise vested stock option awards, but did not receive any other compensation. As of December 31, 2022, such individuals held vested, “in-the-money” options with the following aggregate intrinsic values: (based on the Company’s closing stock price on December 30, 2022): $6,229,236 for Mr. Coughlin; $4,993,469 for Mr. Gavrilenya; and $0 for Mr. Freund. These officers did not receive any other compensation for their consulting services, nor did they receive severance compensation or benefits in connection with their separations from employment.

07. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANINFORMATION

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2016,2022, with respect to 2010 Plan, which is our only equity compensation plansplan under which common stock isshares are authorized for issuance,issuance:

Plan Category

Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (A) (1)

Weighted Average Exercise
Price of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (B) (2)

Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (A)) (C) (3)

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

5,765,804

$188.12

4,614,377

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

Total5,765,804$188.124,614,377

(1) Includes performance-based awards assuming the maximum level of performance, which consist of our 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (including all subsequent amendments thereto) and its predecessor, our 2002 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan. We believe thatmay overstate the dilution associated with such awards.

(2) The weighted-average exercise price for allrelates to outstanding stock options only. The Company’s restricted share and restricted stock unit awards have no exercise price.

(3) All of the options grantedshares available under these plans reflect at least 100% of fair market value on the dates of grant for the options at issue.

Plan Category Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (A) Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (B) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (A) (C)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders      
2002 Plan 757,000
 $10.09
 
2010 Plan 5,388,854
 $102.60
 2,968,584
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders 
 $
 
       
Total 6,145,854
 $91.20
 2,968,584
No further grants were allowed under the 2002 Plan after the 2010 Plan became effective.

may be issued for awards other than options, warrants or rights, such as restricted stock.

08. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committeecompensation committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis provided above. Based on its review and discussions, the committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee(1)
Thomas M. Hagerty (Chair)
Joseph W. Farrelly
Steven T. Stull

(1) Ms. Moddelmog joined the Board of DirectorsStatement and the Compensation Committee after the meetings in which the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement was reviewed and discussed.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The non-employee members of our Board of Directors receive compensation for serving as directors. We believe restricted stock awards are an appropriate form of compensation for our directors because the value of the grants will increase as the value of our stock price increases, thus aligning the interests of these directors with those of our stockholders. Annual grants for director service have a target value at grant in 2016 of approximately $250,000, with prorated grants determined by the Board of Directors from time to time for newly elected directors. The amount of these grants was determined basedReport on our Board of Directors’ general experience with market levels of director compensation.
In addition, the Board of Directors approved a cash payment in the amount of $50,000Form 10-K for the audit committee chairman and information technology and security chairman, Messrs. Macchia and Farrelly, respectively, for 2016. The decision to provide cash compensation is reviewed on an annual basis.
All members of our Board of Directors are reimbursed for actual expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board meetings. Mr. Clarke does not receive any compensation for service on our Board of Directors.
The following table sets forth the total compensation provided to each non-employee director that served during any part of 2016.

37






 Fees earned or paid in cash ($) Stock awards ($)(1) Total ($)
Michael Buckman
 242,877 242,877
Joseph W. Farrelly50,000
 242,877 292,877
Thomas M. Hagerty
 242,877 242,877
Mark A. Johnson
 242,877 242,877
Richard Macchia50,000
 242,877 292,877
Jeffrey S. Sloan
 242,877 242,877
Steven T. Stull
 242,877 242,877
______________
fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

Compensation Committee

(1)During 2016, the Compensation Committee granted Messrs. Buckman, Farrelly,Thomas M. Hagerty Johnson, Macchia, Sloan and Stull each 1,954 shares of restricted stock for their service on the Board of Directors during 2016, which vested on January 1, 2017. The value for stock awards in this column represents the grant date fair value for the stock award granted in 2016, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718.(Chair)
Messrs. Buckman, Farrelly, Hagerty, Johnson, Macchia, Sloan and Stull did not hold any stock option awards as of December 31, 2016. Ms. Moddelmog joined the Board in 2017 and thus did not receive Director compensation in 2016.

Joseph W. Farrelly

Hala G. Moddelmog

Steven T. Stull

09.  COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During the 2016 fiscal year, none

None of our executive officers servedcurrently serves on the Compensation Committeecompensation committee or Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of any other company of which any member or proposed member of our Compensation Committeecompensation committee is an executive officer.




2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement53



10. CEO PAY RATIO

As required by item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, the compensation committee reviewed a comparison of our CEO’s annual total compensation in fiscal year 2022 to that of all other Company employees for the same period. We identified our median employee by determining December 2022 pay (which was our consistently applied compensation measure for purposes of this disclosure) for all of our employees (as defined for purposes Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K), excluding our CEO, who were employed by us on December 31, 2022. For this purpose, the total pay for each employee was determined by calculating such employee’s total December 2022 compensation using the same categories of compensation that are required to be included in the Summary Compensation Table. We then annualized that total for each employee, but did not annualize the compensation for temporary or seasonal employees or make full-time equivalent adjustments. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments when identifying our median employee. We applied a foreign currency to U.S. dollar exchange rate to the compensation paid in foreign currency based on rates as of December 31, 2022.

The annual total compensation for fiscal year 2022 for our CEO was $3,986,998, as set forth in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table for 2022 above, and for our median employee it was $42,985, making the resulting ratio approximately 93 to 1. This was calculated, in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of SEC Regulation S-K, based on our payroll and employment records. The SEC rules for identifying the “median employee” and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow reporting companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratios reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio set forth above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

Approximately 60% of our employees are located outside of the United States, in several different countries. In several of these countries the cost of living is much lower than in the United States, as is employee compensation. In light of this, we also conducted a review of compensation for our employees located only in the United States. We included all such employees, and calculated the median of such employees using the same definitions and methodology as described above with respect to our full employee group. We determined that the annual total compensation of the median compensated U.S.-based employee, other than our CEO, was $72,716. The ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to that of such U.S.-based employee was 55 to 1.

11. PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE

As required by pay versus performance rules adopted by the SEC on August 25, 2022 (“PVP Rules”) and in effect for the first time for this Proxy Statement, the below Pay Versus Performance table (“PVP Table”) provides information about compensation for this Proxy Statement’s NEOs, as well as NEOs from our 2022 and 2021 Proxy Statements (each of 2020, 2021, and 2022, a “Covered Year”). The PVP Table also provides information about the results for certain financial performance measures during those same Covered Years. In reviewing this information, there are a few important things to consider:

As required by the PVP Rules, we describe the information in columns (c) and (e) as “compensation actually paid” (or “CAP”) to the applicable NEOs, but these CAP amounts do not entirely reflect compensation that our NEOs actually earned for their service in the Covered Years. Instead, CAP reflects a calculation involving a combination of realized pay (primarily for cash amounts) and realizable or accrued pay (primarily for pension benefits and equity awards); and

As required by the PVP Rules, we provide information about our total shareholder return (“TSR”) results, PVP Peer Group (as defined below) TSR results and U.S. GAAP net income results (the “External Measures”) during the Covered Years in the PVP Table, but we did not actually base any compensation decisions for the NEOs on, or link any NEO pay to, these particular External Measures because the External Measures were not metrics used in our incentive plans during the Covered Years.

Due to the use of the Adjusted EPS in our incentive programs, the Company has determined that, pursuant to the PVP Rules, Adjusted EPS should be designated as the “Company-Selected Measure” because we believe it is the most important financial measure that we used to link 2022 NEO pay to our performance.



542023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


11. PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE

Pay Versus Performance Table(1)

Year (a)

Summary
Compensation
Table (“SCT”)
Total for PEO (b)

Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO (c) (2)

Average Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO Named

Executive Officers (d)

Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO Named
Executive
Officers (e) (2)

VALUE OF INITIAL FIXED $100
INVESTMENT BASED ON:

Net Income
(in millions) 

(h) (5)

Company-
Selected Measure:
Adjusted EPS (i) (6)

Total
Shareholder
Return (f) (3)

Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return (g) (4)

2022$3,986,998($24,347,434)$3,883,399$208,386$63.84$98.20$954$16.10
2021$57,923,473$31,186,881$4,524,830$2,515,971$77.80$118.74$839$13.21
2020$1,311,225($325,275)$2,179,759$2,244,485$94.82$124.60$704$11.09

(1) Mr. Clarke was our principal executive officer (“PEO”) for the full year for each of 2022, 2021 and 2020. For 2022, our non-PEO NEOs were Ms. Vickery, Mr. Freund, Mr. Netto, Mr. King, Mr. Gavrilenya and Mr. Coughlin. For 2021, our non-PEO NEOs were Mr. Freund, Mr. Coughlin, Mr. Gavrilenya, and Mr. Netto. For 2020, our non-PEO NEOs were Mr. Freund, Eric R. Dey, Mr. Coughlin, Mr. Gavrilenya, and Mr. Netto.

(2) For each of Covered Year, in determining both the CAP to our PEO and the average CAP to our non-PEO NEOs for purposes of this PVP Table, we deducted from or added back to the total amounts of compensation reported in column (b) or column (d) (as applicable) for such CoveredYear the following amounts:

Item and Value Added (Deducted)202220212020

For Mr. Clarke:

Summary Compensation Table Total:

$3,986,998

$57,923,473

$1,311,225

- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits
+ service cost of pension benefits
+ prior service cost of pension benefits
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value
- SCT “Option Awards” column value($55,556,000)
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year$36,577,408
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years($28,334,433)($1,636,500)
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year($7,758,000)
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year
Compensation Actually Paid:($24,347,434)$31,186,881($325,275)

For Non-PEO NEOs (Average):
Summary Compensation Table Total:

$3,883,399

$4,524,830

$2,179,759

- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits
+ service cost of pension benefits
+ prior service cost of pension benefits
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value($1,320,911)($1,535,353)($751,891)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value($2,050,064)($2,215,289)($920,014)
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year$1,147,042$2,757,866$2,918,190
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years($786,777)($1,011,487)($39,397)
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year$172,355($4,596)($642,836)
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year($836,658)($499,325)
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year
Compensation Actually Paid:$208,386$2,515,971$2,244,485

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement55


11. PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE

(3) For each Covered Year, our TSR was calculated as the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, measured as the quotient of (a) the sum of (i) the cumulative amount of dividends for a period beginning with our closing price on the NYSE on December 31, 2019 through and including the last day of the fiscal year covered (each one-year, two-year and three-year period, the “Measurement Period”), assuming dividend reinvestment, plus (ii) the difference between our closing stock price at the end versus the beginning of the Measurement Period, divided by (b) our closing share price at the beginning of the Measurement Period. Each of these yearly percentage changes was then applied to a deemed fixed investment of $100 at the beginning of the Measurement Period to produce the Covered Year-end values of such investment as of the end of 2022, 2021 and 2020, as applicable. Because Covered Years are presented in the table in reverse chronological order (from top to bottom), the table should be read from bottom to top for purposes of understanding cumulative returns over time.

(4) For purposes of this pay versus performance disclosure, our peer group is the S&P 500® Data Processing & Outsourced Services Sub Industry Index (the “PVP Peer Group”). For each Covered Year, our peer group cumulative total shareholder return was calculated based on a deemed fixed investment of $100 through the Measurement Period, assuming dividend reinvestment, in the PVP Peer Group

(5) Net income is calculated in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

(6) Adjusted EPS (or adjusted net income per diluted share) is calculated as set forth on Appendix A.

The following charts provide, across the Covered Years, (1) a comparison between our cumulative TSR and the cumulative TSR of the PVP Peer Group, and (2) illustrations of the relationships between (A) the CAP to the PEO and the average CAP to our non-PEO NEOs (in each case as set forth in the PVP Table above) and (B) each of the performance measures set forth in columns (f), (h) and (i) of the PVP Table above.

CAP, as calculated under SEC rules, reflects adjusted values to equity awards during the years shown in the PVP Table based on stock prices at various times, certain accounting valuation assumptions, and projected performance modifiers, but does not necessarily reflect actual amounts realized under those awards. Although our performance in GAAP net income and Adjusted EPS steadily increased during the 2020-2022 period, the charts below do not show a clear relationship between CAP and our performance during such period. There are two primary reasons for this disconnect. First, Mr. Clarke did not receive any equity compensation awards in 2020 or 2022. The significant increase in PEO CAP for 2021 primarily reflects the value of a performance-based stock option award granted to Mr. Clarke during 2021, which award was intended to be the entirety of Mr. Clarke’s long-term equity compensation for the four-year period of 2020 through 2023. Second, CAP is heavily influenced by the timing of equity award grants and our stock price performance during the covered periods. Our stock price at the particular points in time used to determine the fair value

of outstanding equity awards for purposes of 2022 CAP (including Mr. Clarke’s performance stock option award) resulted in a significantly lower CAP for both the PEO and non-PEO NEOs for 2022 as compared to 2021.

For a discussion of how our Compensation Committee assessed “pay-for-performance” and how our executive compensation program is designed to link executive compensation with the achievement of our financial and strategic objectives as well as stockholder value creation each year, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement.

Net Income vs. Compensation Actually Paid

 



TSR and Peer TSR vs. Compensation Actually Paid

 

Adjusted EPS vs. Compensation Actually Paid

 

INFORMATION REGARDING BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP


562023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


11. PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE

The following table lists the three financial performance measures that we believe represent the most important financial performance measures we used to link compensation actually paid to our named executive officers for fiscal 2022 to our performance:

Most Important Financial
Performance Measures
Adjusted EPS
GAAP Revenue, as adjusted
Stock Price

12.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Our audit committee is responsible for reviewing and approving transactions with the Company involving $120,000 or more in any calendar year, and in which certain related persons have a direct or indirect material interest. A related person is: (1) any of our directors, nominees for director or executive officers, (2) any immediate family member of a director, nominee for director or executive officer, and (3) any person, and his or her immediate family members, or entity that was a beneficial owner of 5% or more of any of our outstanding equity securities at the time the transaction occurred or existed. The policy does not apply to compensation and benefits subject to compensation committee approval, transactions below certain dollar thresholds in which the related party’s interest is indirect and other specified transactions. Our policy is published on our website at https://investor. FLEETCOR.com.

13. DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our common shares to file reports of their ownership and changes in ownership of our common shares with the SEC. Our employees prepare these reports for our directors and executive officers who request it on the basis of information obtained from them

and from our records. Based on information available to us during fiscal year 2022, and representations made to us by the reporting persons, we believe that all reports were made in a timely manner other than one report relating to three total transactions for Mr. Coughlin, one report relating to two total transactions for Mr. Clarke, two reports relating to four total transactions for Mr. Freund, two reports relating to four total transactions for Mr. Gavrilenya, two reports relating to four total transactions for Mr. King, one report relating to two total transactions for Mr. Netto, and three reports relating to five total transactions for Ms. Vickery, all of which were filed late due to administrative error.

14. FIVE YEAR STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The graph assumes $100 invested on December 29, 2017, at the closing per share price of our common shares on that day ($192.43) through December 31, 2022, and compares (a) the percentage change of our cumulative total shareholder return on the common shares (as measured by dividing (1) the difference between our share price at the end and the beginning of the period presented by (2) the share price at the beginning of the periods presented) with (b) (1) the S&P 500® Data Processing & Outsourced Services index and (2) the S&P 500®.

 



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement57


15. AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Our audit committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. It is available on our website at https://investor. FLEETCOR.com under Corporate Governance. The audit committee reviews the charter annually.

The Board reviews annually the NYSE’s listing standards definition of independence for audit committee members to determine that each member of the audit committee meets the standards. The Board has determined that Mr. Macchia is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.

The Board has the ultimate authority for effective corporate governance, including oversight of management. The audit committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities by overseeing the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, the qualifications and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged as the Company’s independent auditor, and the performance of the Company’s internal audit function.

The audit committee relies on the expertise and knowledge of management, the internal audit function and the independent auditor in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal control over financial reporting, and disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations. Management is responsible for objectively reviewing and evaluating the adequacy, effectiveness and quality of the Company’s system of internal control. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent auditor, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with GAAP. The independent auditor also is responsible for expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

The audit committee met five times during 2022. In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022, the audit committee, among other actions:

Reviewed and discussed the Company’s earnings press release, consolidated financial statements and its annual report on Form 10-K, with management and the independent auditor

Reviewed with management and the independent auditor management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting

Reviewed with the independent auditor and management, the audit scope of the independent auditor

Inquired about significant risks, reviewed the Company’s policies for risk assessment and risk management and assessed the steps management is taking to control these risks, and

Met in executive session with the independent auditor

The audit committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditor our 2022 audited consolidated financial statements, and the independent auditor’s report on those financial statements. Management represented to the audit committee that the Company’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP. Ernst & Young LLP presented the matters required to be discussed with the audit committee by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) Audit Standard AU Section 380 Communications with Audit Committees and Rule 2-07 of SEC Regulation S-X. This review included a discussion with management and the independent auditor of the quality (not merely the acceptability) of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments and the disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related footnotes, including the disclosures relating to critical accounting policies.



582023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


15. AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The audit committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Company’s independent auditor, both in fact and appearance. Ernst & Young LLP has audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements annually since it was first appointed in 2002. Consistent with its charter, the audit committee, along with the Company management and internal auditors, reviewed EY’s performance as part of the audit committee’s consideration of whether to reappoint the firm as our independent auditors. As part of this review of EY, the audit committee considered independence and objectivity, quality of service, evaluations by our management and internal auditors, the quality and candor of communications with the audit committee and management, (v) the length of time the audit firm has served as our independent auditors, the fees for audit and non-audit services, capability and expertise in the financial services industry and in handling the breadth and complexity of our worldwide operations, the audit approach, and size and reputation. As part of its auditor engagement process, the audit committee considers whether to rotate the independent audit firm, and periodically solicits competitive bids for the independent auditor engagement to help ensure the competitiveness of the independent auditor with respect to each of the factors set forth above.

The audit committee also evaluates the selection of the lead audit partner, including their qualifications and performance, most recently appointing the current lead audit partner for the first time in 2019 after consultation with EY concerning several possible candidates. In connection with the pending expiration of the term of the lead audit partner, the audit committee began discussions during 2022 about the selection of a new lead audit partner for 2024, assuming EY continues to serve as the Company’s independent auditor.

Based on the criteria described above, the audit committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, for filing with the SEC. Also, based on the criteria described above, the audit committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023 subject to shareholder ratification. The Board is recommending that shareholders ratify this selection at the annual meeting.

Audit Committee

Richard Macchia (Chair)

Michael Buckman

Archie Jones, Jr.


2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement59


16. AUDIT MATTERS

Fees Billed by Ernst & Young LLP

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, and fees billed for other services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP during those periods.

Year Ended December 31
 20222021
Audit Fees$9,289,000$8,712,000
Audit Related Fees$712,000$864,000
Tax Fees$1,155,000$252,000
All Other Fees$4,000$4,000
Total$11,159,000$9,832,000

Audit Fees

These amounts represent fees for professional services for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and the services that an independent auditor would customarily provide in connection with subsidiary audits, statutory requirements, regulatory filings and similar engagements for the fiscal year, such as comfort letters, attest services, consents and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC, as applicable.

Audit Fees also include advice on accounting matters that arose in connection with or as a result of the audit or the review of periodic consolidated financial statements and statutory audits that non-U.S. jurisdictions require.

Audit Related Fees

Audit related fees consist of assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements. This category may include fees related to the performance of audits and attest services not required by statute or regulations, audits of our employee benefit plans, due diligence related to mergers, acquisitions, and investments, additional revenue and license compliance procedures related to performance of the review or audit of our financial statements, and accounting consultations about the application of GAAP to proposed transactions.

Tax Fees and All Other Fees

Fees and expenses paid to our Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance, planning and advice. The audit committee has concluded the provision of the non-audit services listed above is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP. None of the services related to the fees described above was approved pursuant to the waiver of pre-approval provisions set forth in the SEC rules.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor

The audit committee has established a policy for pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditor and is responsible for fee negotiations with the independent auditor. Each year, the audit committee approves the terms on which the independent auditor is engaged for the ensuing fiscal year. At least quarterly, the Committee will review and, if appropriate, pre-approve services to be performed by the independent auditor, review a report summarizing fiscal year-to-date services provided by the independent auditor, and review an updated projection of the fiscal year’s estimated fees. The audit committee, as permitted by its pre-approval policy, from time to time delegates the approval of certain permitted services or classes of services to a member of the Committee. The Committee will then review the delegate’s approval decisions each quarter. Independent auditor fees are evaluated based on the scope of the proposed work, the overall hours and fees and a reconciliation of overall hours and fees from one year to the next, reasonable and customary fees in the industry, periodic competitive bids, expected increases and decreases based on changes in the Company’s business and other changes such as new acquisitions, expected decrease in hours in the second and subsequent years of ownership of an acquired company, and expected impact of any new processes.



602023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


17. PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS, DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

Our Board of Directors currently consists of eleven members. Except for our CEO, all of our directors are independent under the NYSE rules.

In 2019, we began to phase out the classified board structure that had been in effect since before we went public in 2010. All directors whose terms expire at this year’s annual meeting will stand for election for a one-year term, expiring at the following annual meeting. At and after the annual meeting, all directors will be elected annually and we will have no classified director terms.

Accordingly, all eleven of our directors — Steven T. Stull, Annabelle Bexiga, Michael Buckman, Ronald F. Clarke, Joseph W. Farrelly, Rahul Gupta, Thomas M. Hagerty, Archie L. Jones,

Richard Macchia, Hala G. Moddelmog and Jeffrey S. Sloan — will stand for election to the Board for a one-year term. The accompanying proxy will be voted in favor of each individual to serve as a director unless the shareholder indicates to the contrary on the proxy. The Board expects that each of the nominees will be available to serve, but if any of them is unable to serve at the time the election occurs, the Board may, by resolution, provide for a lesser number of directors or designate a substitute nominee.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the director nominees named above.



18.   PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023

The audit committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023. Shareholder ratification of the appointment is not legally required but the audit committee has decided to request that the shareholders ratify the appointment. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the annual meeting to answer appropriate questions from shareholders and will have the opportunity to make a statement on behalf of the firm, if desired.

If this proposal is not approved by our shareholders at the annual meeting, the audit committee will reconsider its selection of Ernst & Young LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the audit committee may, in its discretion, select a different registered public accounting firm at any point during the year if it determines that making a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023.



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement61


19.   PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Our Board and our shareholders have determined to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation, as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, every year. Accordingly, we are asking shareholders to vote to approve the 2022 compensation of our named executive officers as such compensation is disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and other narrative compensation disclosures required by Item 402. This table shows common stockProxy Statement contains all of these required disclosures. The following resolution is submitted:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and other narrative compensation disclosure set forth in this Proxy Statement is hereby APPROVED.

Because the vote on this proposal is advisory, it will not affect compensation already paid or awarded to any named executive officer and will not be binding on the Company, the Board, or the compensation committee. The Board and compensation committee, however, will review the voting results and take into account the outcome in determining future annual compensation for the named executive officers.

We currently conduct a say-on-pay vote annually. Our next say-on-pay vote is expected to occur at the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of named executive officer compensation as set forth above.



20.    PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE FREQUENCY OF SHAREHOLDER VOTING ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Dodd-Frank Act also provides stockholders with the opportunity to indicate, on an advisory basis, their preference as to the frequency of future say on pay votes, often referred to as say when on pay. For this proposal, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we hold future advisory votes on executive compensation every one, two or three years. Stockholders also may abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.

The Board recommends that future advisory votes on executive compensation should be held every one year; that is, beneficially ownedon an annual basis, so that the next advisory vote would be held at our 2024 annual meeting.

Upon review, our Board of Directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs annually is the most appropriate choice for our Company. The Company and the Board feel that an advisory vote each year on executive compensation encourages ongoing engagement and dialogue. While the Company’s executive compensation programs are designed to promote a connection between pay and

performance, the Board recognizes that executive compensation disclosures are made annually and welcomes stockholder input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices. Such annual vote complements our goal of creating and implementing a compensation philosophy, objectives, programs and practices that enhance stockholder value, and can maximize accountability and communication.

Although the vote is non-binding, the Board and the compensation committee will review the voting results in making a decision as to the policy to be adopted by the Board on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, this vote does not overrule any decisions by the Board of Directors, will not create or imply any change to or any additional fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors and will not restrict or limit the ability of stockholders generally to make proposals for inclusion in proxy materials related to executive compensation.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote for every “ONE YEAR” for the frequency of advisory voting on compensation of named executive officers.



622023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


21. PROPOSAL 5: PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE SHAREHOLDERS’ RIGHT TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING

John Chevedden, whose address and share ownership will be furnished promptly by the Company upon receipt of an oral or written request, submitted the following proposal:

Proposal 5 — Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

Shareholders ask our directors, our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and our next three most highly compensated executive officers, whom we referboard to as our “named executive officers” and all persons knowntake the steps necessary to usamend the appropriate company governing documents to own 5 percent or moregive the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock as of December 28, 2017. Percentages are based on 89,753,989 shares outstanding as of December 28, 2017.


38






AMOUNT AND NATURE OF SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED
 Common Stock Owned (2) Right to Acquire (3) Total Securities Owned (4) Percent of Outstanding Shares
Name and Address (1)       
Principal Stockholders:       
The Vanguard Group(5)   
7,093,081 
 7,093,081
 7.9%
P.O. Box 2600 V26       
Valley Forge, PA 19482       
Jennison Associations, LLC(6)   
4,834,245 
 4,834,245
 5.4%
466 Lexington Avenue       
New York, NY 10017       
Lone Pine Capital LLC(7)   
4,688,835 
 4,688,835
 5.2%
Two Greenwich Plaza       
Greenwich, CT 06830       
Brown Brothers Harriman & Company(8)4,539,337 
 4,539,337
 5.1%
140 Broadway       
New York, NY 10055       
        
        
Named Executive Officers and Directors:       
Ronald F. Clarke(9)   
480,666 3,516,665
 3,997,331
 4.5%
Eric R. Dey(10)   
24,195 88,000
 112,195
    *
John S. Coughlin (11)   
25,987 167,625
 193,612
    *
Charles Freund(12)   
16,170 88,000
 104,170
    *
Todd W. House (13)   
4,367 11,000
 15,367
    *
Michael Buckman(14)   
14,991 
 14,991
    *
Joseph W. Farrelly(15)   
8,691 
 8,691
    *
Thomas M. Hagerty(16)   
1,667 
 1,667
    *
Mark A. Johnson(17)   
102,491 
 102,491
    *
Richard Macchia(18)   
11,767 
 11,767
    *
Hala G. Moddelmog(19)1,334 
 
    *
Jeffrey S. Sloan(20)   
9,991 
 9,991
    *
Steven T. Stull(21)   
16,738 
 16,738
    *
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (22 Persons)(22)   
811,193 4,159,687
 4,970,880
 4.6%
______________________
 *Less than 1%
(1)Unless otherwise noted, the business address for the individual is: c/o FleetCor Technologies, Inc., 5445 Triangle Parkway, Peachtree Corners, Georgia, 30092.
(2)Unless otherwise noted, includes shares for which the named person has sole voting and investment power or has shared voting and investment power with his spouse. Excludes shares that may be acquired through stock option exercises.
(3)Includes shares that can be acquired through stock option exercises through February 26, 2018.
(4)Includes common stock, restricted stock, and shares that can be acquired through stock option exercises through February 26, 2018.
(5)This information was reported on a Schedule 13G filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 13, 2017. The Schedule 13G was filed on behalf of: (1) Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company (“VFTC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., which is the beneficial owner of 49,035 shares or 0.05% of the common stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts, and (2) Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. (“VIA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., which is the beneficial owner of 68,968 shares or 0.07% of the common stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.
(6)This information was reported on a Schedule 13G filed by Jennison Associations LLC with the SEC on February 2, 2017. The Schedule 13G was filed by the Jennison Associates LLC (“Jennison”), which furnishes investment advice to several investment

39






companies, insurance separate accounts and institutional clients (“Managed Portfolios”). As a result of its role as investment adviser of the Managed Portfolios, Jennison may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of the Issuer’s Common Stock held by such Managed Portfolios. Prudential Financial, Inc. (“Prudential”) indirectly owns 100% of equity interests of Jennison. As a result, Prudential may be deemed to have the power to exercise orcall a special shareholder meeting. This includes that each share shall have an equal right per share to directformally participate in the exercisecalling for a special shareholder meeting.

The current FleetCor Technologies right to call for a special shareholder meeting is like a bait and switch right. The bait is the 25% figure which seems favorable.

However the 25% figure goes downhill fast. Only non-street name shares have a right to call a special shareholder meeting. Thus if one makes the reasonable estimate that 50% of FleetCor stock is non-street name stock, it means that our current requirement that 25% of shares are needed to call for a special shareholder meeting translates into 50% of this one category of stock and all other FleetCor shares are 100% excluded.

The next downhill bump is that all shares not owned for one full continuous year are 100% excluded. Thus the owners of such voting and/or dispositive power50% of FleetCor stock could determine that Jennison maythey own 65% of the category of FleetCor stock that can call a special shareholder meeting if they include the shares that are owned for less than a full continuous year. Thus a somewhat favorable figure of 25% can translate into an unfavorable 65% of shares to call a special shareholder meeting.

The 10% figure, that gives each share an equal right to formally participate in calling for a special shareholder meeting, is also reasonable because the laws of some states mandate that 10% of shares be able to call a Special shareholder meeting. Another sign that a 10% of shares is reasonable is that a number of companies that have a 25% figure then allow the 10% figure to apply to one shareholder who owns 10% of shares.

Calling for a special shareholder meeting is hardly ever used by shareholders but the main point of the right to call for a special shareholder meeting is that it gives shareholders at least significant standing to engage effectively with respectmanagement. Management will have an incentive to genuinely engage with shareholders, instead of stonewalling, if shareholders seeking engagement with management will have a realistic Plan B option of calling a special shareholder meeting.

Please vote yes: Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement — Proposal 5



Board of Directors Statement of Opposition

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal

The Board recommends that you vote against this proposal. The Company already provides a meaningful and balanced right for shareholders to call a special meeting and the Company’s common stock held byproposed decrease in the Managed Portfolios. Jennison does not file jointly with Prudential, as such;percentage of shares required to call a special meeting is neither necessary nor in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

The Company currently provides that shareholders holding in aggregate at least 25% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock reported on Jennison’s 13G are also includeda “net long” basis may request a special meeting. A 25% threshold, which is common among public companies, strikes an appropriate balance between avoiding an imprudent use of Company and shareholder resources to address the special interests of a select group of shareholders,

while at the same time ensuring that shareholders holding a meaningful minority of our outstanding shares have a mechanism to call a special meeting if they deem it appropriate.

Special meetings require the expenditure of considerable time, effort and resources, including significant costs in the shares reported on the 13G filed by Prudential on January 24, 2017, in which Prudential states it has sole voting power on an additional 233,143 shareslegal and administrative fees, costs for preparing, printing and distributing materials and soliciting proxies, and diversion of Board and management time away from overseeing and running our business. Accordingly, special meetings should be limited to circumstances where shareholders holding a meaningful minority of the Company’s common stock.stock believe a matter is sufficiently urgent or extraordinary to justify considering such matters between annual meetings. By reducing the ownership threshold to 10%, a small minority of shareholders could use the special meeting mechanism to advance their own more narrow agenda, without regard to the broader interests of the Company and its other shareholders.



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement
(7)This information was reported on a Schedule 13G filed by Lone Pine Capital LLC with the SEC on February 14, 2017. The Schedule 13G was filed on behalf of the following entities: (1) Lone Pine Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Lone Pine Capital"), which serves as investment manager to (2) Lone Spruce, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Lone Spruce"), (3) Lone Cascade, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Lone Cascade"), (4) Lone Sierra, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Lone Sierra"), (5) Lone Tamarack, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Lone Tamarack"), (6) Lone Cypress, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company ("Lone Cypress"), (7) Lone Kauri, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company ("Lone Kauri"), (8) Lone Monterey Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company ("Lone Monterey Master Fund"), and (9) Lone Savin Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company ("Lone Savin Master Fund", and together with Lone Spruce, Lone Cascade, Lone Sierra, Lone Tamarack, Lone Cypress, Lone Kauri, Lone Monterey Master Fund and Lone Savin Master Fund, the "Lone Pine Funds"), with respect to the Common Stock directly held by each of the Lone Pine Funds; and (10) Stephen F. Mandel, Jr. ("Mr. Mandel"), the managing member of Lone Pine Managing Member LLC, which is the Managing Member of Lone Pine Capital, with respect to the Common Stock directly held by each of the Lone Pine Funds and reported that each of the reporting persons beneficially owned and had shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 4,688,835 shares.63

(8)This information was reported on a Schedule 13G filed by Brown Brothers Harriman and Company (“Brown Brothers”) with the SEC on October 19, 2017.
(9)Includes 380,666 shares of common stock, vested options of 3,304,165, options of 212,500 vesting within 60 days and 100,000 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(10)Includes 10,017 shares of common stock, vested options of 44,000, options of 44,000 vesting within 60 days and 14,178 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(11)Includes 1,630 shares of common stock, vested options of 135,500, options of 32,125 vesting within 60 days and 24,357 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(12)Includes 15,000 shares of common stock, vested stock options of 44,000, options of 44,000 vesting within 60 days and 1,170 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(13)Includes 4,367 shares of common stock and options of 11,000 vesting within 60 days.
(14)Includes 13,324 shares of common stock and 1,667 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(15)Includes 7,024 shares of common stock and 1,667 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(16)Includes 1,667 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(17)Includes 100,824 shares of common stock and 1,667 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(18)Includes 10,100 shares of common stock and 1,667 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(19)Includes 500 shares of common stock and 834 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(20)Includes 8,324 shares of common stock and 1,667 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements.
(21)Represents 6,247 shares of common stock held by Advantage Capital Financial Company, LLC (“Advantage Capital”) and related entities, 8,824 shares of common stock held by Mr. Stull and 1,667 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements. Mr. Stull has shared voting power with respect to such shares of common stock held by Advantage Capital, and as a result, may be deemed to beneficially own such shares. Mr. Stull disclaims ownership of the shares held by the Advantage Capital entities except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Advantage Capital is a private equity fund that invests on behalf of other investors.
(22)In addition to the officers and directors named in this table, nine other executive officers are members of this group.


21. PROPOSAL 5: PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE SHAREHOLDERS’ RIGHT TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING

Nor is such a measure necessary to enable the views of particular shareholders to be expressed. The Company maintains a robust shareholder engagement program with a track record of taking action in direct response to shareholder feedback. Along with strong corporate governance practices, including a proxy access provision and annual director elections with majority voting, this provides our shareholders with numerous avenues to make their views known and to communicate with our Board, management, and other shareholders to effect change. We are not awareencourage and facilitate regular communication with large and small shareholders about important issues relating to our business and governance and regularly incorporate feedback from those engagements into our governing documents, policies, and practices.

For example, and as described under “FLEETCOR At a Glance” above, we have taken decisive action in recent years around our shareholder outreach initiatives and we believe that our compensation practices address the feedback we received. Our stockholder engagement ensured that we heard the feedback of any arrangements, knownour shareholders – in addition to generous access to the registrant, including any pledge by any personmanagement team, after we mailed the 2022 proxy, but before the 2022 stockholder meeting, we offered the opportunity to discuss our proxy with our top 10 stockholders (as of securitiesDecember 31, 2021).

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 5 for the ability of only 10% holders of the registrantCompany’s common shares to call a special meeting of shareholders.



Other Business

We know of no other business to be considered at the meeting and the deadline for shareholders to submit proposals or nominations has passed. However, if other matters are properly presented at the meeting, or at any adjournment or

postponement of its parents, the operationmeeting, and you have properly submitted your proxy, then the named proxies will vote your shares on those matters according to their best judgment.



22. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Shareholder Proposals

Any proposal that a shareholder wishes to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card for the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and be received no later than December 29, 2023 at the following address, FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 2400, Atlanta, Georgia 30305.

However, in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after June 9, 2024, notice must be received a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials for the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders.

If a shareholder wishes to present a proposal before the 2024 annual meeting but does not wish to have a proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy in accor-

dance with Rule 14a-8 or to nominate someone for election as a director, the shareholder must give written notice to our Corporate Secretary at the address noted above. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must be received no earlier than February 10, 2024, which mayis 120 days prior to the anniversary of this year’s annual meeting, or later than March 11, 2024, which is 90 days prior to the anniversary of this year’s annual meeting. However, in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within thirty days before or after June 9, 2024, notice by the shareholder must be received by the later of the tenth day following the date of the public announcement and the 90th day prior to the annual meeting. Our bylaws contain specific procedural requirements regarding a shareholder’s ability to nominate a director or submit a proposal to be considered at a subsequentmeeting of shareholders. The Bylaws are available on our website at https://investor. FLEETCOR.com under Corporate Governance.



642023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement


22. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Universal Proxy Rules

In addition to satisfying the requirements under our Bylaws, if a shareholder intends to comply with the universal proxy rules and to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees, the shareholder must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, which notice must be postmarked or transmitted electronically to our Corporate Secretary at the address noted above no later than 60 calendar days prior to the one-year anniversary of this year’s annual meeting (for the 2024 annual meeting, no later than April 10, 2024). If the date result in a change in control of the registrant.


2024 annual meeting is changed by more than 30 calendar days from such anniversary date, however, then the shareholder must provide notice by the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2024 annual meeting and the 10th calendar day following the date on which public announcement of the date of the 2024 annual meeting is first made.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

Solicitation of Proxies

The Company is paying the costs of the solicitation of proxies. We have retained DF King & Co., Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies from beneficial owners of shares for the annual meeting. We have agreed to pay DF King a fee of approximately $20,000 per year plus out-of-pocket expenses. You may contact DF King at (888) 548-6498.

Proxies may be solicited by officers, directors and regular supervisory and executive employees of FleetCor,the Company, none of whom will receive any additional compensation for their services. These solicitations may be made personally or by mail,

facsimile, telephone, messenger, or via the Internet. FleetCorThe Company will pay persons holding shares of common stockshares in their names or in the names of nominees, but not owning such shares beneficially, such as brokerage houses, banks, and other fiduciaries, in accordance with NYSE Rule 451 for the expense of forwarding solicitation materials to their principals. FleetCorThe Company will pay all proxy solicitation costs.




40




costs in accordance with NYSE Rule 451.



VOTING PROCEDURES

Voting Procedures

Tabulation of Votes.Votes: Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. will tabulate votes cast by proxy or in person at the meeting. We will report the results in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days of the Special Meeting.

annual meeting.

Vote Required; Effect of an Abstention and Broker Non-Votes.Non-Votes: The shares of a stockholderholder whose ballot on any or all proposals is marked as “abstain” will be included in the number of shares present at the Special Meetingannual meeting for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held by a broker or other custodian, you may instruct your broker how you would like your shares voted. If you wish to vote the shares you own beneficially at the meeting, you must first request and obtain a “legal proxy”proxy from your broker or other custodian. If you choose not to provide instructions or a legal proxy, your shares are referred to as “uninstructeduninstructed shares.” Your Whether your broker or custodian will not havehas the discretion to vote these shares on your behalf.behalf depends on the ballot item. The following table summarizes the vote threshold required for passage of theeach proposal and the effect of abstentions and uninstructed shares held by brokers.



Proposal
Number

Item

Vote

Required for
Approval

Abstentions

Uninstructed
Shares

Board Voting
Recommendation

1

To elect the eleven directors

Majority of votes cast

Not counted

Not voted

FOR

Proposal Number

2

To ratify the reappointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent public accounting firm for 2023

Item

Majority of votes cast

Not counted

Vote Required for Approval

Discretionary vote

AbstentionsUninstructed SharesBoard Voting Recommendation

FOR

1

3

To approve, on an advisory basis, named executive officer compensationApprove the FleetCor Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Compensation PlanMajority of sharesvotes cast

Not counted

Not voted

FOR

4

To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of shareholder voting on compensation of the company’s named executive officers

Majority of votes cast

Not counted

Not voted

ONE YEAR

5

To vote on a shareholder proposal to modify the shareholder right to call a special shareholder meeting, if properly presented

Majority of votes cast

Not counted

Not voted

AGAINST

2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement65

 Not countedNot votedFOR


22. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

If you sign and return a proxy card or vote your shares via the Internet but do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted as listed in the “Board Voting Recommendation” column in the table above.

Dissenters’ rights are not applicable to the matter being voted upon.

Where to Find More Proxy Voting Information.

The Securities and Exchange Commission website has a variety of information about the proxy voting process at www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxymatters.shtml.
Contact the FleetCor Investor Relations department through our website at investor.fleetcor.com or by phone at (770) 729-2017.
Contact the broker or bank through which you beneficially own your shares.

Information:

The SEC’s website has a variety of information about the proxy voting process at www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxymatters.shtml.

Contact the Investor Relations department through our website at https://investor.FLEETCOR.com or by phone at (770) 417-4697.

Contact the broker or bank through which you beneficially own your shares.

Revoking Your Proxy. StockholdersProxy: Shareholders of record may revoke their proxy and change their vote at any time before the polls close at the Special Meetingannual meeting by submitting a subsequent proxy (if you received a proxy card) or by using the Internet, by telephone or by mail with a later date;to vote after the date of your proxy; sending written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at FleetCor, 5445 Triangle Parkway,FLEETCOR, 3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 400, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092;2400, Atlanta, Georgia 30305; or voting in person at the Special Meeting.annual meeting. If you hold shares through a bank or broker, please refer to your proxy card or other voting information form forwarded by your bank or broker to see how you can revoke your proxy (if you received one) and change your vote.


41






STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Any proposal that a stockholder wishes

Proxy Authority: When you submit your proxy, you authorize Ronald F. Clarke and Alissa Vickery, or either one of them, each with full power of substitution, to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and must be received no later than January 12, 2018vote your shares at the following address, FleetCor Technologies, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 5445 Triangle Parkway, Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092, STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL. However, in the event that the annual meeting is calledin accordance with your instructions or, if no instructions are given, in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as described in the table above.

The proxies, in their discretion, are further authorized to vote on any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting, for a date that isthe election of one or more persons to the Board if any of the nominees becomes unable to serve or for good cause will not within thirty days before or after June 21, 2018, notice byserve, on matters which the stockholder must be receivedboard does not know a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail ourmaking the proxy materials for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.

If a stockholder wishes to present a proposal before the 2018 annual meeting but does not wish to have a proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy in accordance with Rule 14a-8 or to nominate someone for election as a director, the stockholder must give written notice to our Corporate Secretarysolicitations will be presented at the address noted above. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must be received no earlier than February 21, 2018, nor later than March 23, 2018. However, in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within thirty daysor any other matters which may properly come before or after June 21, 2018, notice by the stockholder must be received by the later of the tenth day following the date of the Public Announcement (as defined in our bylaws) of the date of the annual meeting and the 90th day prior to the annual meeting. Our bylaws contain specific procedural requirements regarding a stockholder’s ability to nominate a directorany postponements or submit a proposal to be considered at a meetingadjournments thereto.

Householding of stockholders. The bylaws are available on our website at investor.fleetcor.com under Corporate Governance.

STOCKHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS OF NOMINEES
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors considers recommendations for candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors by a stockholder. It will consider and evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended from other sources. If the Board determines to nominate a stockholder-recommended candidate and recommends his or her election, then that nominee’s name will be included in the proxy statement for the next annual meeting.
Our stockholders also have the right under our bylaws to directly nominate director candidates and should follow the procedures outlined in our bylaws. To be timely for consideration at our 2018 annual meeting, a stockholder’s notice to the corporate secretary regarding a direct nomination must be received no earlier than February 21, 2018, or later than March 23, 2018. However, in the event that the 2018 annual meeting is called for a date that is not within thirty days before or after June 21, 2018, notice by the stockholder must be received by the later of the tenth day following the date of the Public Announcement (as defined in our bylaws) of the date of the annual meeting and the 90th day prior to the annual meeting.
Stockholder nominations must be addressed to: FleetCor Technologies, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 5445 Triangle Parkway, Suite 400, Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092, DIRECTOR CANDIDATE RECOMMENDATION.


HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS
Proxy Materials

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholdersshareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders.shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholdersshareholders and cost savings for companies.

This year, a number of banks and brokers with account holders who are FleetCor stockholdersshareholders will be “householding” FleetCor’sour proxy materials. A single proxy statement will be delivered to multiple stockholdersshareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders.shareholders. Once you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding”“house- holding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement, please notify your bank or broker, or direct your written request to FleetCorFLEETCOR Technologies, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 5445 Triangle Parkway,3280 Peachtree Road, Suite 400, Peachtree Corners,2400, Atlanta, Georgia 30092,30305, HOUSEHOLDING, and FleetCorwe will deliver a separate copy of the proxy statement upon request. StockholdersShareholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy statement and annual report at their address and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact their bank or broker.

DATED: Peachtree Corners, Georgia, December 29, 2017

42

662023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement









23. APPENDIX A



FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN


Amended

Management’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Adjusted Net Income and RestatedAdjusted Net Income Per Diluted Share

We have defined the non-GAAP measure adjusted net income as net income as reflected in our statement of ___________, 2018


i






TABLE OF CONTENTS
§ 1.BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE1
   
§ 2.DEFINITIONS1
2.1Affiliate1
2.2Board1
2.3Cause1
2.4Certificate2
2.5Change in Control2
2.6Code3
2.7Committee3
2.8Company3
2.9Director3
2.10Fair Market Value3
2.11Good Reason3
2.12ISO4
2.13Key Employee4
2.141933 Act4
2.151934 Act4
2.16Net Option Exercise4
2.17Non-ISO4
2.18Option4
2.19Option Certificate4
2.20Option Price4
2.21Parent4
2.22Plan4
2.23Protection Period5
2.24Rule 16b-35
2.25SAR Value5
2.26Stock5
2.27Stock Appreciation Right5
2.28Stock Appreciation Right Certificate5
2.29Stock Grant5
2.30Stock Grant Certificate5
2.31Subsidiary5
2.32Ten Percent Shareholder5
   
§ 3.SHARES AND GRANT LIMITS5
3.1Shares Reserved5
3.2Source of Shares5
3.3Reduction and Restoration of Shares Reserved5
3.4Use of Proceeds6
3.5Grant Limits6
3.6Minimum Vesting Period6
   
§ 4.EFFECTIVE DATE7
   
§ 5.COMMITTEE7
   
§ 6.ELIGIBILITY7
   
§ 7.OPTIONS7

ii






7.1Committee Action7
7.2Option Certificate7
7.3$100,000 Limit7
7.4Option Price8
7.5Payment8
7.6Exercise8
   
§ 8.STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS8
8.1Committee Action8
8.2Terms and Conditions9
8.3Exercise9
   
§ 9.STOCK GRANTS10
9.1Committee Action10
9.2Conditions10
9.3Dividends, Creditor Status and Voting Rights11
9.4Satisfaction of Forfeiture Conditions11
9.5Performance Goals for Income Tax Deduction11
   
§ 10.NON-TRANSFERABILITY12
   
§ 11.SECURITIES REGISTRATION12
   
§ 12.LIFE OF PLAN13
   
§ 13.ADJUSTMENT13
13.1Capital Structure13
13.2Shares Reserved13
13.3Transactions Described in § 424 of the Code14
13.4Fractional Shares14
   
§ 14.CHANGE IN CONTROL14
14.1No Continuation or Assumption of Plan or Grants/Terms of Certificate14
14.2Continuation or Assumption of Plan or Grants14
   
§ 15.AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION15
   
§ 16.MISCELLANEOUS15
16.1Shareholder Rights15
16.2No Contract of Employment15
16.3Tax Withholding15
16.4Construction15
16.5Other Conditions16
16.6Rule 16b-316
16.7Coordination with Employment Agreements and Other Agreements16
16.8Section 409A16






iii






§ 1.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) previously adopted the FleetCor Technologies, Inc. 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”), which became effective upon the completionincome, adjusted to eliminate (a) non-cash stock based compensation expense related to share based compensation awards, (b) amortization of deferred financing costs, discounts and intangible assets, amortization of the initial public offeringpremium recognized on the purchase of receivables, and our proportionate share of amortization of intangible assets at our equity method investment, (c) integration and deal related costs, and (d) other non-recurring items, including unusual credit losses occurring largely due to COVID-19, the impact of discrete tax items, impairment charges, asset write-offs, restructuring costs, gains due to disposition of assets/businesses, loss on extinguishment of debt, and legal settlements. We calculate adjusted net income and adjusted net income per diluted share to eliminate the effect of items that we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance.

We have defined the non-GAAP measure adjusted net income per diluted share as the calculation previously noted divided by the weighted average diluted shares outstanding as reflected in our statement of income.

Adjusted net income and adjusted net income per diluted share are supplemental measures of operating performance that do not represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, net income per diluted share or cash flow from operations, as determined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. We believe it is useful to exclude non-cash share-based compensation expense from adjusted net income because non-cash equity grants made at a certain price and point in time do not necessarily reflect how our business is performing at any particular time and share based compensation expense is not a key measure of our core operating performance. We also believe that amortization expense can vary substantially from company to company and from period to period depending upon their financing and accounting methods, the fair value and average expected life of their acquired intangible assets, their capital structures and the method by which their assets were acquired; therefore, we have excluded amortization expense from our adjusted net income. We also believe that integration and deal related costs and one-time non-recurring expenses, gains, losses, and impairment charges do not necessarily reflect how our investments and business are performing. We adjust net income for the tax effect of each of these non-tax items.



2023 Notice of Annual Meeting & Proxy Statement67


23. APPENDIX A

Set forth below is a reconciliation of adjusted net income and adjusted net income per diluted share to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income and net income per diluted share (in millions, except per share amounts):

 

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

Net income$954$839$704$895$811$740$452$362$369$285$216$147$108
Net income per diluted share$12.42$9.99$8.12$9.94$8.81$7.91$4.75$3.85$4.24$3.36$2.52$1.76$1.34
Adjustments:             
Stock-based compensation expense121804361709364903827192227
Amortization

238

215

196

217

227

233

184

181

100

56

38

25

22

Net gain on disposition of assets/ business(153)(109)
Investment (gains) losses(30)37452540
Loss on write-off of fixed assets29
Loss on extinguishment of debt21623163
Legal settlements and litigation666611
Integration and deal related cost (1)193112
Restructuring and related (subsidies) costs7(2)4351
Unauthorized access impact2
Other non-cash adjustments90(5)2(29)
Total pre-tax adjustments (2)39334631629117527927431112583574949

Income tax impact of pre-tax adjustments at the effective tax rate (3)

(111)

(76)

(68)

(62)

(39)

(93)

(67)

(81)

(46)

(24)

(17)

(15)

(14)

Impact of investment sale, other discrete item and tax reform (4)

10

(62)

23

(127)

Adjusted net income (2)$1,237$1,110$962$1,062$970$799$659$593$448$343$256$182$143
Adjusted net income per diluted share$16.10$13.21$11.09$11.79$10.53$8.54$6.92$6.30$5.15$4.05$2.99$2.17$1.77

1.  Beginning in 2020, the Company included integration and deal related costs in its definition to calculate adjusted net income and adjusted net income per diluted share. Prior period amounts were immaterial.

2. The sums of pre-tax adjustments and adjusted net income may not equal the totals presented due to rounding.

3.  2022 year includes $9.0 million adjustment for tax benefit of certain income determined to be permanently invested. 2021 year includes remeasurement of deferreds due to the increase in UK corporate tax rate from 19% to 25% of $6.5 million. 2020 year includes a tax reserve adjustment related to poor year tax positions of $9.8 million. 2019 excludes the results of the Company’s common stock. The 2010 Plan was subsequently amendedMasternaut investment on our effective tax rate, as results were reported on a post-tax basis and restatedno tax-over-book outside basis difference prior to disposition. 2017 year excludes the net gain realized upon our disposition of Nextraq. representing a pretax gain of $175.0 million and tax on gain of $65.8 million. 2014 through 2017 years exclude the results of our equity method investment on our effective May 30, 2013 (the “2013 Plan”), pursuanttax rate, as results from our equity method investment are reported within the Consolidated Income Statements on a post-tax basis and no tax-over-book outside basis differences related to whichour equity method investment are expected to reverse.

4.  Represents the number of shares of Stock available for future grants was increasedimpact to taxes from 6,750,000 shares to 13,250,000 shares. On December 20, 2017, the Board amended and restated the 2013 Plan, establishing the FleetCor Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Compensation Plan as set forth in this document (the “Plan”). The Board amended and restated the Plan to (i) increase the number of shares of Stock available for issuance of future grants by 3,500,000 shares and (ii) make certain other changes as set forth herein.

The purpose of this Plan is to promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders by authorizing the Committee to grant Options and Stock Appreciation Rights and to make Stock Grants to Key Employees and Directors in order (1) to attract and retain Key Employees and Directors, (2) to provide an additional incentive to each Key Employee or Director to work to increase the value of Stock and (3) to provide each Key Employee or Director with a stake in the future of the Company to align their interests with those of the Company’s shareholders.

§ 2.
DEFINITIONS
2.1Affiliate—means any organization (other than a Subsidiary) that would be treated as under common control with the Company under § 414(c) of the Code if “50 percent” were substituted for “80 percent” in the income tax regulations under § 414(c) of the Code.

2.2Board—means the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.3Cause—means, unless otherwise provided in a Key Employee’s employment agreement, the occurrence of any of the following:

(a)Key Employee is convicted of, or pleads guilty to, any felony or any misdemeanor involving fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement, or Key Employee confesses or otherwise admits to the Company, any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, any officer, agent, representative or employee of the Company or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, or to a prosecutor, or otherwise publicly admits, to committing any action that constitutes a felony or any act of fraud, misappropriation, or embezzlement; or

(b)there is any material act or omission by Key Employee involving malfeasance or gross negligence in the performance of Key Employee’s duties to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates to the material detriment of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates; or
(c)Key Employee breaches in any material respect any other material agreement or understanding between Key Employee and the Company in effect as of the time of such termination; or

(d)a previous employer of Key Employee shall commence against Key Employee and/or the Company an action, suit, proceeding or demand arising from an alleged violationreversal of a non-competition or other similar agreement between Key Employee and such previous employer.

provided, however, that no such act or omission or event shall be treated as “Cause” under this definition unless the Committee determines reasonably and in good faith that “Cause” does exist under the Plan.


1






2.4Certificate—means, as applicable, an Option Certificate, a Stock Appreciation Right Certificate or a Stock Grant Certificate.

2.5Change in Control—means any one of the following events or transactions:
(a)the sale by the Company of all or substantially all of its assets or the consummation by the Company of any merger, consolidation, reorganization, or business combination with any person, in each case, other than in a transaction:

(i)in which persons who were shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such sale, merger, consolidation, reorganization, or business combination own, immediately thereafter, (directly or indirectly) more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the purchaser of the assets or the merged, consolidated, reorganized or other entity resulting from such corporate transaction (the “Successor Entity”);

(ii)in which the Successor Entity is an employee benefit plan sponsored or maintained by the Company or any person controlled by the Company; or

(iii)after which more than 50% of the members of the board of directors of the Successor Entity were members of the Board at the time of the action of the Board approving the transaction (or whose nominations or elections were approved by at least 2/3 of the members of the Board at that time);
(b)the acquisition directly or indirectly by any “person” or “group” (as those terms are used in Sections 13(d), and 14(d) of the 1934 Act, including without limitation, Rule 13d-5(b)) of “beneficial ownership” (as determined pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the 1934 Act) of securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (“voting securities”) of the Company that represent 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company then-outstanding voting securities, other than:

(i)an acquisition by a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any person controlled by the Company or by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any person controlled by the Company;

(ii)an acquisition of voting securities by the Company or a person owned, directly or indirectly, by the holders of at least 50% of the voting power of the Company then outstanding securities in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the stock of the Company;

(iii)an acquisition of voting securities from the Company; or

(iv)an acquisition of voting securities pursuant to a transaction described in § 2.5(a) that would not be a Change in Control under § 2.5(a); and

for purposes of clarification, an acquisition of the Company’s securities by the Company that causes the Company voting securities beneficially owned by a person or group to represent 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding voting securities is not to be treated as an “acquisition” by any person or group for purposes of this § 2.5(b);

(c)the Incumbent Directors (as defined hereafter) cease for any reason (other than ordinary course events, such as death or retirement situations), to constitute at least a majority of the members of the Board. “Incumbent Directors” means (x) the members of the Board on the Effective Date, (y) any director whose election

2






or nomination as director was approved by a vote of at least 2/3 of the Incumbent Directors in office at the time of such vote, and (z) any director serving on the Board as a result of the consummation of a transaction described in § 2.5(a) that would not be a Change in Control under § 2.5(a); provided, however, that no director will constitute an Incumbent Director if their initial assumption of office occurred as a result of an actual or threatened (a) election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person or group other than the Board or (b) tender offer, merger, sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets, consolidation, reorganization, or business combination that would be a Change in Control under § 2.5(a) on the consummation thereof.

(d)the approval by the Company’s shareholders of a liquidation or dissolution of the Company other than in connection with a transaction described in § 2.5(a) that would not be a Change in Control thereunder.

Except as otherwise specifically defined in this § 2.5, the term “person” means an individual, corporation, partnership, trust, association or any other entity or organization.

2.6Code—means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

2.7Committee—means the Compensation Committee of the Board or a subcommittee of such Compensation Committee, which committee or subcommittee shall have at least 2 members, each of whom shall be appointed by and shall serve at the pleasure of the Board and shall come within the definition of a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 and, with respect to Stock Grants granted prior to November 2, 2017 which were intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under § 162(m) of the Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, an “outside director” under § 162(m) of the Code.

2.8Company—means FleetCor Technologies, Inc. and any successor to FleetCor Technologies, Inc.

2.9Director—means any member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary or affiliate (as such term is defined in Rule 405 of the 1933 Act) of the Company.

2.10Fair Market Value—means for any date (a) the closing price for a share of Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date as reported by The Wall Street Journal or, if The Wall Street Journal no longer reports such closing price, (b) such closing price as reported by a financial network or newspaper or trade journal selected by the Committee or, if no such closing price is available on such date, (c) such closing price as so reported in accordance with § 2.10(a) for the immediately preceding business day, or, if no newspaper or trade journal reports such closing price or if no such price quotation is available, (d) the current fair market value of a share of Stock that the Committee acting in good faith determines through the reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method which takes into consideration in applying its methodology all available information material to the value of the Company, considering factors including (as applicable) (1) the value of the Company’s tangible and intangible assets, (2) the present value of the Company’s anticipated future cash-flows, (3) the market value of equity interests in similar companies engaged in trades or businesses substantially similar to those engaged in by the Company, the value of which can be readily determined through nondiscretionary, objective means (such as through trading prices on an established securities market or an amount paid in an arms-length private transaction), (4) recent arm’s length transactions involving the sale or transfer of shares of Stock, and (5) other relevant factors such as control premiums or discounts for lack of marketability and whether the valuation method is used for other purposes that have a material economic effect on the Company, the holders of Stock or the Company’s creditors.

2.11Good Reason—means, unless otherwise provided in a Key Employee’s employment agreement, Option Certificate, Stock Appreciation Right Certificate or Stock Grant Certificate or unless the Committee provides otherwise in connection with a Change in Control:


3






(a)any significant reduction by the Company of the Key Employee’s authority, duties, titles or responsibilities; provided, however, a change in the Key Employee’s title that is not accompanied by a significant reduction in the Key Employee’s duties or responsibilities shall not satisfy this § 2.11(a);
(b)a significant reduction by the Company in the Key Employee’s base salary or bonus opportunity unless such reduction is part of a reduction that is applied on a uniform basis to similarly situated employees; or
(c)any material breach by the Company of any other provision of its agreement with the Key Employee;
provided, however,

(d)Good Reason shall not exist unless the Key Employee shall first give written notice of the facts and circumstances providing Good Reason to the Company and shall allow the Company no less than twenty (20) days to remedy, cure or rectify the situation giving rise to Good Reason; and

(e)the Company’s failure to continue the Key Employee’s appointment or election as a director or officer of any of its Affiliates shall not constitute Good Reason.

2.12ISO—means an option granted under this Plan to purchase Stock which is intended to satisfy the requirements of § 422 of the Code.

2.13Key Employee—means an employee of the Company or any Subsidiary or Parent or Affiliate to whom the Committee decides for reasons sufficient to the Committee to make a grant under this Plan.

2.141933 Act—means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2.151934 Act—means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2.16Net Option Exercise—means the exercise of an Option under § 7.5 pursuant to a cashless exercise procedure which results in the issuance of a number of shares of Stock comparable to the number of shares of Stock which would have been issued pursuant to the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right which covered the same number of shares of Stock as the Option and had an SAR Value equal to the Option Price under such Option.
2.17Non-ISO—means an option granted under this Plan to purchase Stock which is intended to fail to satisfy the requirements of § 422 of the Code.

2.18Option—means an ISO or a Non-ISO which is granted under § 7.

2.19Option Certificate—means the certificate (whether in electronic or written form) which sets forth the terms and conditions of an Option.

2.20Option Price—means the price which shall be paid to purchase one share of Stock upon the exercise of an Option granted under this Plan.

2.21Parent—means any corporation which is a parent corporation (within the meaning of § 424(e) of the Code) of the Company.

2.22Plan—means this FleetCor Technologies, Inc. 2010 Equity Compensation Plan as effective in accordance with § 4 and as amended from time to time thereafter in accordance with § 15.

4







2.23Protection Period shall mean the two (2) year period which begins on the date of a Change in Control.

2.24Rule 16b-3—means the exemption under Rule 16b-3 to Section 16(b) of the 1934 Act or any successor to such rule.

2.25SAR Value—means the value assigned by the Committee to a share of Stock in connection with the grant of a Stock Appreciation Right under § 8.

2.26Stock—means the common stock of the Company.

2.27Stock Appreciation Right—means a right which is granted under § 8 to receive the appreciation in a share of Stock.

2.28Stock Appreciation Right Certificate—means the certificate (whether in electronic or written form) which sets forth the terms and conditions of a Stock Appreciation Right which is not granted as part of an Option.
2.29Stock Grant—means a grant under § 9 which provides exclusively for the issuance of shares of Stock.

2.30Stock Grant Certificate—means the certificate (whether in electronic or written form) which sets forth the terms and conditions of a Stock Grant.

2.31Subsidiary—means a corporation which is a subsidiary corporation (within the meaning of § 424(f) of the Code) of the Company.

2.32Ten Percent Shareholder—means a person who owns (after taking into account the attribution rules of § 424(d) of the Code) more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of either the Company, a Subsidiary or Parent.

§ 3.
SHARES AND GRANT LIMITS

3.1Shares Reserved. Subject to § 13, the number of shares of Stock reserved for issuance under this Plan shall be increased by 3,500,000 shares (the “Share Increase”), which will increase the number of shares authorized under the 2013 Plan from 13,250,000 shares (the “2013 Share Pool”) to 16,750,000 shares. For sake of clarity, the shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced by the number of shares of Stock issued or issuable pursuant to awards granted under the 2010 Plan or 2013 Plan prior to the Effective Date. No more than 3,194,550 shares shall (subject to § 13) be granted as Stock Grants from the 2013 Share Pool. All shares available for issuance under this Plan shall be available for issuance pursuant to ISOs.

3.2Source of Shares. The shares of Stock described in § 3.1 shall be reserved to the extent that the Company deems appropriate from authorized but unissued shares of Stock and from shares of Stock which have been reacquired by the Company.

3.3Reduction and Restoration of Shares Reserved. All shares of Stock reserved for issuance under § 3.1 shall remain available for issuance under this Plan until issued pursuant to the exercise of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right or issued pursuant to a Stock Grant; provided,

5






(a)any shares which are issued pursuant to a Stock Grant and which thereafter are forfeited shall again be available for issuance under § 3.1;

(b)any shares of Stock issued or otherwise used to satisfy a tax withholding obligation under § 16.3 shall no longer be available for issuance under § 3.1;

(c)any shares of Stock which are tendered to the Company to pay the Option Price of an Option or which are tendered to the Company in satisfaction of any condition to a Stock Grant shall not be added to the shares of Stock reserved for issuance under § 3.1;

(d)the number of shares of Stock reserved for issuance under § 3.1 shall be reduced on a share-by-share basis for each share of Stock issued in connection with the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right or an Option or (subject to § 3.3(a)) pursuant to a Stock Grant;
(e)any shares of Stock that were subject to a stock-settled Stock Appreciation Right that were not issued upon the exercise of such Stock Appreciation Right shall not be added to the shares of Stock reserved for issuance under § 3.1; and

(f)any shares of Stock that are purchased by the Company with proceeds from the exercise of an Option shall not be added to the shares of Stock reserved for issuance under § 3.1.

3.4Use of Proceeds. The proceeds which the Company receives from the sale of any shares of Stock under this Plan shall be used for general corporate purposes and shall be added to the general funds of the Company.
3.5Grant Limits.

(a)Subject to § 13, no Key Employee in any calendar year shall be granted Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, and/or Stock Grants which in the aggregate are with respect to more than 1,000,000 shares of Stock (i.e., the number of shares of Stock that may be purchased pursuant to Options granted to a Key Employee in any calendar year, plus the number of shares of Stock with respect to which Stock Appreciation Rights granted to a Key Employee in any calendar year are based, plus the number of shares of Stock granted to a Key Employee in any calendar year pursuant to a Stock Grant shall not, in the aggregate, exceed 1,000,000).

(b)During the 2018 and 2019 calendar years, no Options, Stock Appreciation Rights or Stock Grants may be granted from the Share Increase to the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer, Ron Clarke.

(c)No Director in any calendar year shall be granted Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and/or Stock Grants which have an aggregate fair value in excess of $500,000, determined under applicable accounting standards as of the date of grant.

3.6Minimum Vesting Period. Any Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant granted by the Committee after the Effective Date under the Plan shall be subject to a minimum vesting period of not less than one year from the date the Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant is awarded; provided, however, that the foregoing minimum vesting period shall not apply in connection with (a) a Change in Control, (b) a key employee terminating employment due to death or disability or a director ceasing service due to death or disability, (c) a substitute award granted in connection with a transaction pursuant to § 13.3 that does not reduce the vesting period of the award being replaced, or (d) Options, Stock Appreciation Rights or Stock Grants, which in aggregate cover a number of shares of Stock not to exceed five (5%) of the total number of shares of Stock available under the Plan as of the Effective Date. For the purposes hereof, “disability” shall mean a physical or mental incapacity

6






which impairs the individual’s ability to substantially perform his or her duties for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days, as determined by the Committee based on information provided to it.

§ 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE

The Plan shall become effective on the date on which the Plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company (the “Effective Date”).

§ 5.
COMMITTEE

This Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee acting in its absolute discretion shall exercise such powers and take such action as expressly called for under this Plan and, further, the Committee shall have the power to interpret this Plan and (subject to § 14 and § 15 and Rule 16b-3) to take such other action in the administration and operation of this Plan as the Committee deems equitable under the circumstances, which action shall be binding on the Company, on each affected Key Employee or Director and on each other person directly or indirectly affected by such action. Furthermore, the Committee as a condition to making any grant under this Plan to any Key Employee or Director shall have the right to require him or her to execute an agreement which makes the Key Employee or Director subject to non-competition provisions and other restrictive covenants which run in favor of the Company.

§ 6.
ELIGIBILITY

Only Key Employees who are employed by the Company or a Subsidiary or Parent shall be eligible for the grant of ISOs under this Plan. All Key Employees and all Directors shall be eligible for the grant of Non-ISOs and Stock Appreciation Rights and for Stock Grants under this Plan.

§ 7.
OPTIONS

7.1Committee Action. The Committee acting in its absolute discretion shall have the right to grant Options to Key Employees and to Directors under this Plan from time to time to purchase shares of Stock, and Options may be granted for any reason the Committee deems appropriate, including as a substitute for compensation otherwise payable in cash.
7.2Option Certificate. Each grant of an Option shall be evidenced by an Option Certificate, and each Option Certificate shall set forth whether the Option is an ISO or a Non-ISO and shall set forth such other terms and conditions of such grant as the Committee acting in its absolute discretion deems consistent with the terms of this Plan; however, (a) if the Committee grants an ISO and a Non-ISO to a Key Employee on the same date, the right of the Key Employee to exercise the ISO shall not be conditioned on his or her failure to exercise the Non-ISO and (b) no Option Certificate shall provide for the automatic grant of any new Option upon the exercise of an Option subject to such Option Certificate.

7.3$100,000 Limit. No Option shall be treated as an ISO to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Stock subject to the Option which would first become exercisable in any calendar year exceeds $100,000. Any such excess shall instead automatically be treated as a Non-ISO. The Committee shall interpret and administer the ISO limitation set forth in this § 7.3 in accordance with § 422(d) of the Code, and the Committee shall treat this § 7.3 as in effect only for those periods for which § 422(d) of the Code is in effect.

7







7.4Option Price. The Option Price for each share of Stock subject to an Option shall be no less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date the Option is granted; provided, however, if the Option is an ISO granted to a Key Employee who is a Ten Percent Shareholder, the Option Price for each share of Stock subject to such ISO shall be no less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date such ISO is granted. The Committee shall not (except in accordance with § 13 and § 14) take any action absent the approval of the Company’s shareholders (whether through an amendment, a cancellation, making replacement grants or exchanges or any other means) to directly or indirectly reduce the Option Price of any outstanding Option or to make a tender offer for any Option if the Option Price for such Option on the effective date of such tender offer exceeds the then Fair Market Value of a share of Stock subject to such Option.

7.5Payment. The Option Price shall be payable in full upon the exercise of any Option and, at the discretion of the Committee, an Option Certificate can provide for the payment of the Option Price either in cash, by check, in Stock or through any cashless exercise procedure which is acceptable to the Committee, including a Net Option Exercise, or in any combination of such forms of payment. Any payment made in Stock shall be treated as equal to the Fair Market Value of such Stock on the date action acceptable to the Committee is taken to tender such Stock to the Committee or its delegate.
7.6Exercise.

(a)Vesting. Subject to the minimum vesting requirements of Section 3.6, the Committee may condition the right to exercise an Option on the satisfaction of a service requirement or a performance requirement or on the satisfaction of more than one such requirement or the satisfaction of any combination of such requirements or may grant an Option which is not subject to any such requirements, all as determined by the Committee in its discretion and as set forth in the related Option Certificate.

(b)Exercise Period. Each Option granted under this Plan shall be exercisable in whole or in part to the extent vested at such time or times as set forth in the related Option Certificate, but no Option Certificate shall make an Option exercisable on or after the earlier of

(1)the date which is the fifth anniversary of the date the Option is granted, if the Option is an ISO and the Key Employee is a Ten Percent Shareholder on the date the Option is granted, or
(2)the date which is the tenth anniversary of the date the Option is granted, if the Option is (a) a Non-ISO or (b) an ISO which is granted to a Key Employee who is not a Ten Percent Shareholder on the date the Option is granted.

(c)Termination of Status as Key Employee or Director. Subject to § 7.6(a), an Option Certificate may provide for the exercise of an Option after a Key Employee’s or a Director’s status as such has terminated for any reason whatsoever, including death or disability.
§ 8.
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

8.1Committee Action. The Committee acting in its absolute discretion shall have the right to grant Stock Appreciation Rights to Key Employees and to Directors under this Plan from time to time, and each Stock Appreciation Right grant shall be evidenced by a Stock Appreciation Right Certificate or, if such Stock Appreciation Right is granted as part of an Option, shall be evidenced by the Option Certificate for the related Option. Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted for any reason the Committee deems appropriate, including as a substitute for compensation otherwise payable in cash. The Committee shall not (except in accordance with § 13 and § 14)

8






take any action absent the approval of the Company’s shareholders (whether through an amendment, a cancellation, making replacement grants or exchanges or any other means) to directly or indirectly reduce the SAR Value of any outstanding Stock Appreciation Right or to make a tender offer for any Stock Appreciation Right if the SAR Value for such Stock Appreciation Right on the effective date of such tender offer exceeds the then Fair Market Value of a share of Stock with respect to which the appreciation in such Stock Appreciation Right is based.

8.2Terms and Conditions.

(a)Stock Appreciation Right Certificate. If a Stock Appreciation Right is granted independent of an Option, such Stock Appreciation Right shall be evidenced by a Stock Appreciation Right Certificate, and such certificate shall set forth the number of shares of Stock on which the Key Employee’s or Director’s right to appreciation shall be based and the SAR Value of each share of Stock. The SAR Value shall be no less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted. The Stock Appreciation Right Certificate shall set forth such other terms and conditions for the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right as the Committee deems appropriate under the circumstances, but no Stock Appreciation Right Certificate shall make a Stock Appreciation Right exercisable on or after the date which is the tenth anniversary of the date such Stock Appreciation Right is granted.

(b)Option Certificate. If a Stock Appreciation Right is granted together with an Option, such Stock Appreciation Right shall be evidenced by the related Option Certificate, the number of shares of Stock on which the Key Employee’s or Director’s right to appreciation is based shall be no more than the number of shares of Stock subject to the related Option, and the SAR Value for each such share of Stock shall be no less than the Option Price under the related Option. Each such Option Certificate shall provide that the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right with respect to any share of Stock shall cancel the Key Employee’s or Director’s right to exercise his or her Option with respect to such share and, conversely, that the exercise of the Option with respect to any share of Stock shall cancel the Key Employee’s or Director’s right to exercise his or her Stock Appreciation Right with respect to such share. A Stock Appreciation Right which is granted as part of an Option shall be exercisable only while the related Option is exercisable. The Option Certificate shall set forth such other terms and conditions for the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right as the Committee deems appropriate under the circumstances.
(c)Vesting. Subject to the minimum vesting requirements of Section 3.6, the Committee may condition the right to exercise a Stock Appreciation Right on the satisfaction of a service requirement or a performance requirement or on the satisfaction of more than one such requirement or the satisfaction of any combination of such requirements or may grant a Stock Appreciation Right which is not subject to any such requirements, all as determined by the Committee in its discretion and as set forth in the related Stock Appreciation Right Certificate.

8.3Exercise. A Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable to the extent vested only when the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on which the right to appreciation is based exceeds the SAR Value for such share, and the payment, if any, due on exercise shall be based on such excess with respect to the number of shares of Stock to which the exercise relates. A Key Employee or Director upon the exercise of his or her Stock Appreciation Right shall receive a payment from the Company in cash or in Stock issued under this Plan, or in a combination of cash and Stock, and the number of shares of Stock issued shall be based on the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised. The Committee acting in its absolute discretion shall have the right to determine the form and time of any payment under this § 8.3, subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.



9






§ 9.
STOCK GRANTS

9.1Committee Action. The Committee acting in its absolute discretion shall have the right to make Stock Grants to Key Employees and to Directors, and Stock Grants may be made for any reason the Committee deems appropriate, including as a substitute for compensation otherwise payable in cash. A Stock Grant, at the discretion of the Committee, may be issued in the form of Stock Awards, Performance Shares, or Performance Units. Subject to the minimum vesting requirements of Section 3.6, a “Stock Award” may provide for a contractual right to the issuance of Stock to a Key Employee or Director only after the satisfaction of specific employment or performance or other terms and conditions set by the Committee or may provide for the issuance of Stock to a Key Employee or Director at the time the grant is made, and any Stock issued pursuant to a Stock Award may be issued subject to the satisfaction of specific employment or performance or other vesting terms and conditions which, if not satisfied, will result in the forfeiture of the Stock issued to the Key Employee or Director. A “Performance Share” will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share of Stock on the date of grant. A “Performance Unit” will have an initial notional value that is established by the Committee at the time of grant. The Committee will set performance goals which, depending on the extent to which they are met during the performance period, and the satisfaction of applicable service-based vesting conditions (subject to the minimum vesting requirements of Section 3.6), will determine the number or value of the Performance Shares or Performance Units that will vest (which number or value may be greater than the target number of Performance Shares or Performance Units granted to a Key Employee or Director) and be paid to the such Employee or Director. At the close of the performance period and at the time specified in the Stock Grant Certificate, any earned Performance Shares will be paid in Stock unless otherwise specified in the Stock Grant Certificate, and any earned Performance Units will be paid in the form of cash, Stock, or a combination, as specified in the Stock Grant Certificate. Each Stock Grant shall be evidenced by a Stock Grant Certificate, and each Stock Grant Certificate shall set forth the terms and conditions, if any, under which Stock will be issued under the Stock Grant and the terms and conditions, if any, under which the Key Employee’s or Director’s interest in any Stock which has been so issued will become vested and non-forfeitable.

9.2Conditions.

(a)Conditions to Issuance of Stock under a Stock Grant. The Committee acting in its absolute discretion may make the issuance of Stock pursuant to a Stock Grant subject to the satisfaction of one, or more than one, employment, performance or other term or condition which the Committee deems appropriate under the circumstances for Key Employees or Directors generally or for a Key Employee or a Director in particular, and the related Stock Grant Certificate shall set forth each such term or condition and the deadline for satisfying each such term or condition. Stock issued pursuant to a Stock Grant shall be issued in the name of a Key Employee or Director under § 9.2(b) only after each such term or condition, if any, has been timely satisfied, and any Stock which is so issued shall be held by the Company pending the satisfaction of the related vesting terms and conditions, if any, under § 9.2(b) for the Stock Grant.

(b)Conditions Vesting with respect to Stock Issued. The Committee acting in its absolute discretion may make any Stock issued in the name of a Key Employee or Director pursuant to a Stock Grant subject to the satisfaction of one, or more than one, objective employment, performance or other vesting term or condition that the Committee acting in its absolute discretion deems appropriate under the circumstances for Key Employees or Directors generally or for a Key Employee or a Director in particular, and the related Stock Grant Certificate shall set forth each such vesting term or condition, if any, and the deadline, if any, for satisfying each such vesting term or condition. A Key Employee’s or a Director’s vested and non-forfeitable interest in the shares of Stock underlying a Stock Grant shall depend on the extent to which he or she timely satisfies each such vesting term or condition. If a share of Stock is issued under this § 9.2(b) before a Key Employee’s or Director’s interest in such share of Stock vested and is non-forfeitable, the Company shall have the right to condition any such issuance on

10






the Key Employee or Director first signing an irrevocable stock power in favor of the Company with respect to the forfeitable shares of Stock issued to such Key Employee or Director in order for the Company to effect any forfeiture called for under the related Stock Grant Certificate.

9.3Dividends, Creditor Status and Voting Rights.

(a)Cash Dividends. If a dividend is paid in cash with respect to a share of Stock after such share of Stock has been issued under a Stock Grant but before the first date that a Key Employee’s or a Director’s interest in such share of Stock becomes completely non-forfeitable, the Company shall delay the payment of such cash dividend until his or her interest in such share of Stock becomes completely non-forfeitable and then shall pay such cash dividend (without interest) directly to such Key Employee or Director before the end of the 45 day period which starts on the date his or her interest in such share of Stock becomes completely non-forfeitable. Neither a Key Employee nor a Director shall have the right to assign his or her claim to the payment of a dividend under this § 9.3(a), and any Key Employee’s claim or Director’s claim to any such payment shall be no different than the claim of a general and unsecured creditor of the Company to a payment related to his or her compensation due from the Company. Finally, if a Key Employee or Director forfeits his or her interest in a share of Stock, he or she shall forfeit any right to the payment of any cash dividend with respect to such share of Stock.
(b)Stock Dividends. If a dividend is paid on a share of Stock in Stock or other property after such share of Stock has been issued under a Stock Grant but before the first date that a Key Employee’s or a Director’s interest in such share of Stock (1) is forfeited completely or (2) becomes completely non-forfeitable, the Company shall hold such dividend subject to the same forfeiture conditions under § 9.2(b) as applicable to the related Stock Grant. Neither a Key Employee nor a Director shall have the right to assign his or her claim to the payment of a dividend under this § 9.3(b), and any Key Employee’s claim or Director’s claim to any such payment shall be no different than the claim of a general and unsecured creditor of the Company to a payment related to his or her compensation due from the Company. Finally, if a Key Employee or a Director forfeits his or her interest in a share of Stock, he or she shall forfeit any right to any dividend described in this § 9.3(b) with respect to such share of Stock.
(c)Voting. Except as otherwise set forth in a Stock Grant Certificate, a Key Employee or a Director shall have the right to vote the Stock issued under his or her Stock Grant during the period which comes after such Stock has been issued but before the first date that a Key Employee’s or Director’s interest in such Stock (1) is forfeited completely or (2) becomes completely non-forfeitable subject to the same rules as applicable to any other person who is issued shares of Stock on such date.

9.4Satisfaction of Forfeiture Conditions. A share of Stock shall cease to be subject to a Stock Grant at such time as a Key Employee’s or a Director’s interest in such Stock becomes vested and non-forfeitable under this Plan, and the certificate or other evidence of ownership representing such share shall be transferred to the Key Employee or Director as soon as practicable thereafter.
9.5Performance Goals for Income Tax Deduction.

(a)General. Stock Grants made to Key Employees on or after the Effective Date may, where the Committee under the circumstances deems it to be in the Company’s best interest, be granted subject to a condition related to one, or more than one, performance goal based on the performance goals described in § 9.5(b).

(b)Performance Goals. A performance goal is described in this § 9.5(b) if such goal relates to (1) the Company’s return over capital costs or increases in return over capital costs, (2) the Company’s total earnings or the growth in such earnings, (3) the Company’s consolidated earnings or the growth in such earnings, (4) the Company’s earnings per share or the growth in such earnings, (5) the Company’s net earnings or the growth in

11






such earnings, (6) the Company’s earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items or the growth in such earnings, (7) the Company’s earnings before interest and taxes or the growth in such earnings, (8) the Company’s consolidated net income or the growth in such income, (9) the value of the Company’s stock or the growth in such value, (10) the Company’s stock price or the growth in such price, (11) the Company’s return on assets or the growth on such return, (12) the Company’s cash flow or the growth in such cash flow, (13) the Company’s total shareholder return or the growth in such return, (14) the Company’s expenses or the reduction of such expenses, (15) the Company’s sales growth, (16) the Company’s overhead ratios or changes in such ratios, (17) the Company’s expense-to-sales ratios or the changes in such ratios, or (18) the Company’s economic value added or changes in such value added, (19) the Company’s gross margin or the growth in such gross margin, or (20) the Company’s bad debt expense or the reduction in such bad debt expense.

(c)Alternative Goals. The Committee shall set the performance goal or goals under this § 9.5, and no goal shall be treated as satisfied under this § 9.5 until the Committee certifies that such goal has been satisfied. A performance goal may be set in any manner determined by the Committee, including looking to achievement on an absolute or relative basis in relation to peer groups or indexes, and the Committee may set more than one goal. No change may be made to a performance goal after the goal has been set. However, the Committee may express any goal in terms of alternatives, or a range of alternatives, as the Committee deems appropriate under the circumstances, such as including or excluding (1) any acquisitions or dispositions, restructuring, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and other unusual or non-recurring charges, (2) any event either not directlyallowance related to the operationsdisposition of our investment in Masternaut of $65.7 million in 2019, and impact of tax reform adjustments included in our effective tax rate of $22.7 million in 2018. Also, includes the impact of a discrete tax item for a Section 199 adjustment related to a prior tax year in 2019 results of $1.8 million.

5.  Represents a bad debt loss in the first quarter of 2020 from a large client in our Cambridge business entering voluntary bankruptcy due to the extraordinary impact of the Company or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management or (3) the effects of tax or accounting changes.


(d)Changes in Law. The Committee shall administer any Stock Grants granted prior to November 2, 2017 which qualify as “performance-based compensation” under § 162(m) of the Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Law Changes”), in accordance with the transition rules applicable to binding contracts on November 2, 2017, and shall have the sole discretion to revise this § 9.5 to conform with such Law Changes and the Committee’s administrative practices, all without obtaining further shareholder approval.

§ 10.
NON-TRANSFERABILITY

No Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant shall (absent the Committee’s express, written consent) be transferable by a Key Employee or a Director other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and any Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall (absent the Committee’s express, written consent) be exercisable during a Key Employee’s or Director’s lifetime only by the Key Employee or Director. The person or persons to whom an Option or Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant is transferred by will or by the laws of descent and distribution (or with the Committee’s express, written consent) thereafter shall be treated as the Key Employee or Director.

§ 11.
SECURITIES REGISTRATION

As a condition to the receipt of shares of Stock under this Plan, the Key Employee or Director shall, if so requested by the Company, agree to hold such shares of Stock for investment and not with a view of resale or distribution to the public and, if so requested by the Company, shall deliver to the Company a written statement satisfactory to the Company to that effect. Furthermore, if so requested by the Company, the Key Employee or Director shall make a written representation to the Company that he or she will not sell or offer for sale any of such Stock unless a registration statement shall be in effect with respect to such Stock under the 1933 Act and any applicable state securities law or he or she shall have furnished to the Company an opinion in form and substance satisfactory to the Company of legal counsel satisfactory to the Company that such registration is not required. Certificates or

12






other evidence of ownership representing the Stock transferred upon the exercise of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right or upon the lapse of the forfeiture conditions, if any, on any Stock Grant may at the discretion of the Company bear a legend to the effect that such Stock has not been registered under the 1933 Act or any applicable state securities law and that such Stock cannot be sold or offered for sale in the absence of an effective registration statement as to such Stock under the 1933 Act and any applicable state securities law or an opinion in form and substance satisfactory to the Company of legal counsel satisfactory to the Company that such registration is not required.

§ 12.
LIFE OF PLAN

No Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be granted or Stock Grant made under this Plan on or after the earlier of:

COVID-19 pandemic.

68
(1)the tenth anniversary2023 Notice of the effective date of this Plan (as determined under § 4), in which event this Plan otherwise thereafter shall continue in effect until all outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights have been exercised in full or no longer are exercisable and all Stock issued under any Stock Grants under this Plan have been forfeited or have become non-forfeitable, orAnnual Meeting & Proxy Statement

(2)the date on which all of the Stock reserved under § 3 has (as a result of the exercise of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted under this Plan or the satisfaction of the vesting terms and conditions, if any, with respect to Stock Grants) been issued or no longer is available for use under this Plan, in which event this Plan also shall terminate on such date.

§ 13.
ADJUSTMENT

13.1Capital Structure. The grant limits described in § 3.5, the number, kind or class (or any combination thereof) of shares of Stock subject to outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted under this Plan and the Option Price of such Options and the SAR Value of such Stock Appreciation Rights as well as the number, kind or class (or any combination thereof) of shares of Stock subject to outstanding Stock Grants made under this Plan shall be adjusted by the Committee in a reasonable and equitable manner to preserve immediately after

(a)any equity restructuring or change in the capitalization of the Company, including, but not limited to, spin offs, stock dividends, large non-reoccurring cash or stock dividends, rights offerings or stock splits, or
(b)any other transaction described in § 424(a) of the Code which does not constitute a Change in Control of the Company

the aggregate intrinsic value of each such outstanding Option, Stock Appreciation Right and Stock Grant immediately before such restructuring or recapitalization or other transaction.

13.2Shares Reserved. If any adjustment is made with respect to any outstanding Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant under § 13.1, then the Committee shall adjust the number, kind or class (or any combination thereof) of shares of Stock reserved under § 3.1. The Committee shall have the discretion to limit such adjustment to account only for the number, kind and class of shares of Stock subject to each such Option, Stock Appreciation Right and Stock Grant as adjusted under § 13.1 or to further adjust such number, kind or class (or any combination thereof) of shares of Stock reserved under § 3.1 to account for a reduction in the total number of shares of Stock then reserved under § 3.1 which would result from the events described in § 13.1(a) and § 13.1(b)

13






if no action was taken by the Committee under this § 13.2. The Committee may make any adjustment provided for in this § 13.2 without seeking the approval of the Company’s shareholders for such adjustment unless the Committee acting on the advice of counsel determined that such approval is required under applicable law or the rules of the stock exchange on which shares of Stock are traded.

13.3Transactions Described in § 424 of the Code. If there is a corporate transaction described in § 424(a) of the Code which does not constitute a Change in Control of the Company, the Committee as part of any such transaction shall have right to make Stock Grants and Option and Stock Appreciation Right grants (without regard to any limitations set forth under § 3.5 of this Plan) to effect the assumption of, or the substitution for, outstanding stock grants and option and stock appreciation right grants previously made by any other corporation to the extent that such corporate transaction calls for such substitution or assumption of such outstanding stock grants and stock option and stock appreciation right grants. Furthermore, if the Committee makes any such grants as part of any such transaction, the Committee shall have the right to increase the number of shares of Stock available for issuance under § 3.1 by the number of shares of Stock subject to such grants without seeking the approval of the Company’s shareholders for such adjustment unless such approval is required under applicable law or the rules of the stock exchange on which shares of Stock are traded.

13.4Fractional Shares. If any adjustment under this § 13 would create a fractional share of Stock or a right to acquire a fractional share of Stock under any Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant, such fractional share shall be disregarded and the number of shares of Stock reserved under this Plan and the number subject to any Options, Stock Appreciation Right grants and Stock Grants shall be the next lower number of shares of Stock, rounding all fractions downward. An adjustment made under this § 13 by the Committee shall be conclusive and binding on all affected persons.

§ 14.
CHANGE IN CONTROL

14.1No Continuation or Assumption of Plan or Grants/Terms of Certificate.
(a)Application. This § 14.1 applies only if (i) there is a Change in Control and all of the outstanding Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Stock Grants granted under this Plan are not continued in full force and effect or there is no assumption or substitution of the Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Stock Grants (with their terms and conditions unchanged) granted under this Plan in connection with such Change in Control, or (ii) solely with respect to an Option, Stock Appreciation Rights or Stock Grant that was granted prior to the Effective Date of the A&R Plan, the terms of an Option Certificate, Stock Appreciation Right Certificate or Stock Grant Certificate expressly provide that this § 14.1 applies to the grant made under such certificate even if there is such a continuation, assumption, or substitution of such grant or this Plan.
(b)Full Vesting. Under this § 14.1, if there is a Change in Control of the Company, then the Board shall have the right to deem at the time of such Change in Control any and all terms and conditions to the exercise of all outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights on such date and any and all outstanding issuance and vesting conditions under any Stock Grants on such date to be 100% satisfied as of such date, and the Board shall have the right (to the extent expressly required as part of such transaction) to cancel such Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Stock Grants after providing each Key Employee and Director a reasonable period to exercise his or her Options and Stock Appreciation Rights and to take such other action as necessary or appropriate to receive the Stock subject to any Stock Grants.

14.2Continuation or Assumption of Plan or Grants. This § 14.2 applies to an Option Certificate, Stock Appreciation Right Certificate or Stock Grant Certificate if a Change in Control is not covered by § 14.1(a)(i) and such Certificate is not described in § 14.1(a)(ii). If this § 14.2 applies and if (a) a Key Employee’s employment

14






with the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, any Parent of the Company, or any Affiliate of the Company is terminated at the Company’s initiative for reasons other than Cause or is terminated at the Key Employee’s initiative for Good Reason within the Protection Period or (b) a Director’s service on the Board terminates for any reason within the two-year period starting on the date of such Change in Control, then any conditions to the exercise of such Key Employee’s or Director’s outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights and any then outstanding issuance and forfeiture conditions on such Key Employee’s or Director’s Stock Grant automatically shall expire and shall have no further force or effect on or after the date his or her employment or service so terminates.

§ 15.
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION

This Plan may be amended by the Board from time to time to the extent that the Board deems necessary or appropriate; provided, however, (a) no amendment shall be made absent the approval of the shareholders of the Company to the extent such approval is required under applicable law or the rules of the stock exchange on which shares of Stock are listed and (b) no amendment shall be made to § 14 on or after the date of any Change in Control which might adversely affect any rights which otherwise would vest on the date of such Change in Control. The Board also may suspend granting Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or making Stock Grants under this Plan at any time and may terminate this Plan at any time; provided, however, the Board shall not have the right in connection with any such suspension or termination to unilaterally to modify, amend or cancel any Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted or Stock Grant unless (1) the Key Employee or Director consents in writing to such modification, amendment or cancellation or (2) there is a dissolution or liquidation of the Company or a transaction described in § 14.

§ 16.
MISCELLANEOUS

16.1Shareholder Rights. A Key Employee or Director shall not have any rights to dividends or other rights of a stockholder as a result of the grant of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right pending the actual delivery of the Stock subject to such Option or Stock Appreciation Right to such Key Employee or Director. A Key Employee’s or a Director’s rights as a shareholder in the shares of Stock which remain subject to forfeiture under § 9.2(b) shall be set forth in the related Stock Grant Certificate.

16.2No Contract of Employment. The grant of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right or a Stock Grant to a Key Employee or Director under this Plan shall not constitute a contract of employment or a right to continue to serve on the Board and shall not confer on a Key Employee or Director any rights upon his or her termination of employment or service in addition to those rights, if any, expressly set forth in this Plan or the related Option Certificate, Stock Appreciation Right Certificate or Stock Grant Certificate.
16.3Tax Withholding. Each Option, Stock Appreciation Right and Stock Grant shall be made subject to the condition that the Key Employee or Director consents to whatever action the Committee directs to satisfy the federal and state tax withholding requirements, if any, which the Company determines are applicable to the exercise of such Option or Stock Appreciation Right or to the satisfaction of any vesting conditions with respect to Stock subject to a Stock Grant issued in the name of the Key Employee or Director. No tax withholding shall be effected under this Plan which exceeds the federal and state tax withholding requirements.
16.4Construction. All references to sections (§) are to sections (§) of this Plan unless otherwise indicated. This Plan shall be construed under the laws of the State of Delaware. Each term set forth in § 2 shall, unless otherwise stated, have the meaning set forth opposite such term for purposes of this Plan and, for purposes of such definitions, the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular. Finally, if there is any

15






conflict between the terms of this Plan and the terms of any Option Certificate, Stock Appreciation Right Certificate or Stock Grant Certificate, the terms of this Plan shall control.

16.5Other Conditions. Each Option Certificate, Stock Appreciation Right Certificate or Stock Grant Certificate may require that a Key Employee or a Director (as a condition to the exercise of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right or the issuance of Stock subject to a Stock Grant) enter into any agreement or make such representations prepared by the Company, including (without limitation) any agreement which restricts the transfer of Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right or Stock issued pursuant to a Stock Grant or provides for the repurchase of such Stock by the Company.
16.6Rule 16b-3. The Committee shall have the right to amend any Option or Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant to withhold or otherwise restrict the transfer of any Stock or cash under this Plan to a Key Employee or Director as the Committee deems appropriate in order to satisfy any condition or requirement under Rule 16b-3 to the extent Rule 16 of the 1934 Act might be applicable to such grant or transfer.

16.7Coordination with Employment Agreements and Other Agreements. If the Company enters into an employment agreement or other agreement with a Key Employee or Director which expressly provides for the acceleration in vesting of an outstanding Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant or for the extension of the deadline to exercise any rights under an outstanding Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant, any such acceleration or extension shall be deemed effected pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms of such outstanding Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant and this Plan;provided that any such employment agreement or other agreement with a Key Employee or Director which expressly provides for the acceleration in vesting inconsistent with the requirements of § 3.6 shall not apply with respect to any Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Stock Grant granted on or after the Effective Date of this Plan.

16.8Section 409A. It is the intention of the Company that no award shall be deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code unless and to the extent that the Committee specifically determines otherwise, and the Plan and the terms and conditions of all awards shall be interpreted and administered accordingly. The terms and conditions governing any awards that the Committee determines will be subject to Section 409A of the Code shall be set forth in the applicable award agreement and shall be intended to comply in all respects with Section 409A of the Code, and the Plan and the terms and conditions of such awards shall be interpreted and administered accordingly. The Committee shall not extend the period to exercise an Option or Stock Appreciation Right to the extent that such extension would cause such Option or Stock Appreciation Right to become subject to Section 409A of the Code. Unless the Committee provides otherwise in a Stock Grant Certificate, each Performance Share or Performance Unit shall be paid in full no later than the fifteenth day of the third month after the end of the first calendar year in which such Performance Share or Performance Unit is no longer subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code. If the Committee provides in a Stock Grant Certificate that a Performance Share or Performance Unit is intended to be subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Stock Grant Certificate shall include terms that comply in all respects with Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or an award agreement to the contrary, no event or condition shall constitute a Change in Control with respect to an award to the extent that, if it were, a 20% additional income tax would be imposed under Section 409A of the Code on the holder of such award; provided that, in such a case, the event or condition shall continue to constitute a Change in Control to the maximum extent possible (for example, if applicable, in respect of vesting without an acceleration of payment of such an award) without causing the imposition of such 20% tax.


16






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this Plan to evidence its adoption of this Plan.

FleetCor Technologies, Inc.
By:    
Date:    

17






FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (FLT)
ATTN: BRAD SLUTSKY
5445 TRIANGLE PARKWAY, STE 400
PEACHTREE CORNERS, GA 30092

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until
11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.




proxycard.jpg



2018 SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
February 7, 2018


NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS:
The Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement are available at investor.fleetcor.com



Please sign, date and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.






êPlease detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. ê
E26032-P91612
 

23. APPENDIX A

Reconciliation of Net Income to Pro Forma Adjusted Net Income

($ in millions*, except per share amounts)

 Year Ended 20102011 ChangesPro Forma 2010
Income before income taxes$151$1$152
Provision for income taxes43246
Net income108(2)106
Stock based compensation27(5)22
Amortization of intangible assets1717
Amortization of premium on receivables33
Amortization of deferred financing costs22
Loss on extinguishment of debt33
Total pre-tax adjustments49(2)47
Income tax impact of pre-tax adjustments at the effective tax rate(14)(14)
Total pre-tax adjustments$143$(4)$139
Adjusted net income per diluted share$1.77 $1.66
Diluted shares80.8 83.7

* The sums of pre-tax adjustments and adjusted net income may not equal the totals presented due to rounding.



FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE 2018 SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
February 7, 2018


The undersigned hereby appoints Ronald F. Clarke and Eric R. Dey, and each of them, proxies with full power of substitution for and in the name of the undersigned, to vote all shares of stock of FLEETCOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held Wednesday, February 7, 2018, 10:00 a.m. EDT, and at any adjournment or postponements thereof, upon the matters described in the accompanying2023 Notice of SpecialAnnual Meeting of Stockholders and& Proxy Statement dated December 29, 2017, and upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. The proxies are directed to vote or refrain from voting pursuant to the Proxy Statement as follows and otherwise in their discretion upon all matters that may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournments thereof.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations.





(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)



69





graphic


graphic